Another victory for DUBIN LAW OFFICES
1461414118 by DinSFLA on Scribd
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Comments
Related posts:
- Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Pierce | HAWAII ICA – general issue of material fact as to whether Bank of New York had standing at the time of this foreclosure action was commenced CAAP-16-0000584sdo by DinSFLA on Scribd © 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD |...
- JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Rundgren | Hawaii ICA – VACATED! genuine material fact as to whether JP Morgan Chase was entitled to enforce the subject Note at the time this foreclosure action was commenced Via DUBIN LAW OFFICES 034937431 by DinSFLA on Scribd ©...
- US Bank Trust, N.A. v. Schranz | Hawaii ICA – Genuine issue of material of fact as to TMLF Hawaii LLLC received the original Note & BOA entitled to enforce it prior to the commencement of this action H/T to Dubin Law Offices for this win! 035152614 by...
- PennyMac Corp. v. Travis | Hawaii ICA – There is a genuine issue of fact as to when Chase was entitled to enforce the Note, and thus had standing at the time the Complaint was filed Great Job Gary Dubin Law Offices! CAAP-16-0000806sdo by DinSFLA on...
- Taylor v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC | FL 2DCA “Genuine issues of material fact remain regarding the Taylors’ affirmative defense of lack of notice” JOYCE TAYLOR and LANKFORD TAYLOR, Appellants, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING,...