034937431 by DinSFLA on Scribd
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Comments
Related posts:
- Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Pierce | HAWAII ICA – general issue of material fact as to whether Bank of New York had standing at the time of this foreclosure action was commenced CAAP-16-0000584sdo by DinSFLA on Scribd © 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD |...
- Bank of America v Yeh | HAWAII ICA – BANA did not present evidence to establish its entitlement to enforce the Note at the time the action commenced. H/T DUBIN LAW OFFICES 028866654 (1) by DinSFLA on Scribd...
- HSBC Bank USA v. Yamashita | ICA Hawaii – HSBC Failed to Demonstrate it Was in Possession of the Note and Allonge at the Time This Action Was Commenced, Motion for Default & SJ Vacated CAAP-17-0000026sdo by DinSFLA on Scribd © 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD |...
- Houk v. PennyMAC CORP. | FL 2DCA – PennyMac failed to meet its burden of showing the nonexistence of a genuine issue of material fact regarding its entitlement to enforce the lost note. LANE A. HOUK, Appellant, v. PENNYMAC CORP., substituted as...
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Gilbert | NY Appeals Court – plaintiff failed to demonstrate its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, because it did not eliminate triable issues of fact regarding whether it had standing as the lawful holder or assignee of the subject note on the date it commenced the action Decided on August 27, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE...