Vasquez v. Deutsche Bank | Texas First Circuit - REVERSED & REMANDED for Homeowner to Claim Quiet Title

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Vasquez v. Deutsche Bank | Texas First Circuit – REVERSED & REMANDED for Homeowner to Claim Quiet Title

Vasquez v. Deutsche Bank | Texas First Circuit – REVERSED & REMANDED for Homeowner to Claim Quiet Title

H/T MSFRAUD

Court of Appeals
First District of Texas
NO. 01-13-00220-CV

WINONA FLIPPON VAZQUEZ, Appellant

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, N.A., Appellee

Appeal from the 281st District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2012-21582).

This case is an appeal from the final order signed by the trial court on February 18,
2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised
by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the portion of the trial
court’s order granting summary judgment for the appellee, Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company, N.A., as to the quiet-title claim of the appellant, Winona Flippon Vazquez.

Accordingly, the Court reverses this portion of the trial court’s order and remands the
quiet-title claim.

The Court orders that the appellee, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, N.A.,
pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered July 24, 2014.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, Justice Massengale, and Justice Huddle. Opinion
delivered by Justice Massengale.

 Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8571 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “Vasquez v. Deutsche Bank | Texas First Circuit – REVERSED & REMANDED for Homeowner to Claim Quiet Title”

  1. Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny says:

    It wasn’t that difficult. Not so difficult Appellant Vasquez should have been required to undergo the expense, stress, and difficulty of an appeal.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives