SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant's demurrer

SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant's demurrer

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant’s demurrer

Posted on25 January 2013.

SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant’s demurrer

Via: BERGMAN & GUTIERREZ LLP

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

TERENCE SCHOSHINSKI, as individual,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

COMPASS BANK; and Does 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

© 2010-13 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
www.StopForeclosureFraud.com

Related posts:

Graves v. Wayman, Minn: Court of Appeals | bank is not entitled to protection as a bona fide purchaser …Awards title to the property, free of the interest of any defendants Amos Graves, Appellant, v. Michael Wayman, et al., Respondents,...
Opposition To MERS Demurrer To Fourth Amended Complaint With Requests For Judicial Notice Via Brian Davies: CALIFORNIA OPPOSITION TO MERS DEMURRER WITH FILINGS...
MASSIVE RULING TO PROTECT CALIFORNIA HOMEOWNERS FROM NON JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE: MABRY v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY CODE 2923.5 From: b.daviesmd6605 PUBLISHED OPINION AT THE APPEALS LEVEL FOR CC 2923.5....
BOO-YAA!! NJ Appeals Court Reversal “LPS, LAURA HESCOTT, Assignment Fail, Affidavit Fail” DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. WILSON Excerpt from footnote: [1] The assignment was executed by an...
CARNEY v. BANK OF AMERICA | California Dist. Court “TRO, MERS Interest Discrepancies, ReconTrust may NOT be the Proper Trustee w/ Legal Authority” UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION...

This post was written by:

dinsfla - who has written 5691 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

2 Responses to “SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant’s demurrer”

Charles Reed says:

01/25/2013 at 4:02 pm

This is the situation with Washington Mutual Bank, which is a defunct bank that Wells Fargo is servicing these loans and has foreclosed illegally upon with the help of MERS.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

SUAREZ vs BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON | CA Sup. Court - MERS Assignment, BONY Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication Denied says:

03/11/2013 at 7:04 pm

[...] is another great ruling… The last time we wrote, the judge had overruled the Defendant’s demurrer. This time, they filed for Summary Judgment/Adjudication, and the judge denied their motion! One of [...]

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Archives