SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant’s demurrer - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant’s demurrer

Posted on25 January 2013.

SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant’s demurrer

Via: BERGMAN & GUTIERREZ LLP

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

TERENCE SCHOSHINSKI, as individual,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

COMPASS BANK; and Does 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

[ipaper docId=122199973 access_key=key-1f2b9htf4vc7tom7zhlm height=600 width=600 /]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. Graves v. Wayman, Minn: Court of Appeals | bank is not entitled to protection as a bona fide purchaser …Awards title to the property, free of the interest of any defendants   Amos Graves, Appellant, v. Michael Wayman, et al., Respondents,...
  2. BOO-YAA!! NJ Appeals Court Reversal “LPS, LAURA HESCOTT, Assignment Fail, Affidavit Fail” DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. WILSON Excerpt from footnote: [1] The assignment was executed by an...
  3. Opposition To MERS Demurrer To Fourth Amended Complaint With Requests For Judicial Notice Via Brian Davies: CALIFORNIA OPPOSITION TO MERS DEMURRER WITH FILINGS...
  4. CARNEY v. BANK OF AMERICA | California Dist. Court “TRO, MERS Interest Discrepancies, ReconTrust may NOT be the Proper Trustee w/ Legal Authority” UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION...
  5. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) Foreclosure Bankruptcy COURT Decision. MERS & CITIBANK ARE NOT THE PARTIES IN INTEREST! from: b.daviesmd6605 [ipaper docId=31733884 access_key=key-2n6n8zjy9jnh0f6oj9oy height=600 width=600 /] © 2010-19...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11558 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


2 Responses to “SCHOSHINSKI v COMPASS BANK | CA Superior Court- MERS Assignment, Defunct company cannot assign an interest in property and overruled the Defendant’s demurrer”

  1. Charles Reed says:
    01/25/2013 at 4:02 pm

    This is the situation with Washington Mutual Bank, which is a defunct bank that Wells Fargo is servicing these loans and has foreclosed illegally upon with the help of MERS.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. SUAREZ vs BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON | CA Sup. Court - MERS Assignment, BONY Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication Denied says:
    03/11/2013 at 7:04 pm

    […] is another great ruling… The last time we wrote, the judge had overruled the Defendant’s demurrer. This time, they filed for Summary Judgment/Adjudication, and the judge denied their motion! One of […]


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

176,070 spam blocked by Akismet