EXCERPTS:
5 I do know we have to bill the clients in advance. It
6 wouldn’t be after the fact. From what I recall it would
7 be at least four people that were being served. That’s
8 the person being served, their unknown spouse, Mary Jane
9 and John Doe. So it’s forty-five dollars times four.
10 That’s the amount that we would do before they got
11 served or not, regardless if John Doe was served or the
12 unknown spouse was served.
13 Q It would still be a hundred and eighty
14 dollars?
15 A Right. That’s what I remember.
16 Q What did you think about that?
17 A I thought that was a little unfair. I felt
18 like I wanted to question why. I kind of got the
19 impression from my trainers that we don’t ask questions,
20 we just do what we are told. There was really no
21 handbook during my training as to which clients are
22 billed. I would sit with each training and — I’m
23 trying to remember. It’s been a year.
24 Q That’s okay.
25 A We didn’t have a manual so I was trying to

1 understand why they bill clients differently. I never
2 really got an explanation. I just typed really fast and
3 that’s why I was hired.
4 Q Were you ever aware that Stern had an
5 ownership interest in G&Z?
6 A No.
7 Q Besides process serving did G&Z offer any
8 other services? Were there skip tracers in there?
9 A There were skip tracers, yes.
10 Q Were there investigators?
11 A Private investigators.
12 Q Did David Stern utilize them as well to the
13 best of your knowledge?
14 A Yes. They had an office right next to the
15 input department of about three or four individuals that
16 were skip tracers. I think they had one private
17 investigator. He was an older man. I don’t recall his
18 name.
19 Q How did you become aware that Stern was using
20 them as well?
21 A Because when I was introduced during my
22 interview and after I got hired they said this is our
23 skip trace department and these are private
24 investigator/skip tracers. That’s how I was introduced,
25 by title.

<SNIP>

9 Q So how come you were there only for two
10 months?
11 A I was there only two months because I had to
12 sign a paper that said — I wish I had that paper. They
13 gave out a paper to all employees saying if you don’t
14 sign this paper you’re pretty much considered fired.
15 Don’t even bother coming back to work if you don’t sign
16 it.
17 Q Was it a confidentiality agreement?
18 A Something like that, yeah.
19 Q What was in it that made you not want to sign
20 it?
21 A I wish I had a copy of it.
22 Q I wish you did too.
23 A It’s in my email somewhere. I didn’t have
24 internet at work the past couple of days.
25 Q You have a copy of it?

1 A I have a copy somewhere in my email, yeah.
2 Q Would you send it to me?
3 A Yes, I can send it.

13 Q Okay. That makes sense. So you basically
14 only worked with the night people and didn’t have that
15 much contact with the day people?
16 A I didn’t have that much contact other than
17 when I was training and in that thirty minute gap when
18 everyone is pretty much wrapping it up.
19 Q Did you ever hear anything or did you ever
20 notice anything that was to you made you feel
21 uncomfortable about doing work over there, specifically
22 with Stern’s office besides the four names on every
23 complaint?
24 A Well, not with Stern but the way G&Z was
25 handling. For instance, before I got hired I looked at

1 G&Z’s website and the part where they said they use
2 private investigators and skip tracers, it said that we
3 have fully licensed private investigators. There was
4 one guy Michael Gold and I mentioned him in that letter,
5 that was a skip tracer but he wasn’t licensed. He was
6 still going to school. The only licensed private
7 investigator that I recall was Ira and Michelle.
8 He was talking to a lady that I think only
9 spoke Spanish. There was a language barrier. He was
10 kind of bullying her. His tone of voice was well we
11 need to serve these papers. He was acting as if he was
12 a private investigator. He’s even announced himself as
13 a private investigator. He’s right next to me in the
14 other office and I just felt a little uncomfortable that
15 he’s claiming to be that and he’s not. He was asking
16 for her address and saying we have to do this and saying
17 we’ll serve it at your place of work if we need to. He
18 was really —
19 Q Bullying her?
20 A Bullying her into getting information. I just
21 kind of felt bad for the lady that he was talking to.
22 Q Nothing else about Stern?
23 A No. It was more about G&Z.
24 MS. CLARKSON: This is a two-page memo. It
25 looks like it was sent to Duane. Enter that as

1 Exhibit B. There was a letter dated September 9,
2 2009 that we’ll enter as exhibit C.
3 BY MR. BRIESMEISTER:
4 Q Mary, are those copies that we can keep?
5 A You can keep those. Actually, I have copies
6 on my little hard drive.
7 Q Mary, you indicated you were there
8 approximately two months at G&Z. Can you tell us why
9 you left, under what circumstances did you leave?
10 A Because I did not agree to sign that paper
11 that everyone had to sign.
12 Q That’s the only reason?
13 A That was it.
14 Q Did somebody come to you and say you must sign
15 it or else you have to leave?
16 A It was a group meeting. It was said that
17 everyone has to sign it. Don’t even bother working here
18 if you don’t. They told everyone that they had to sign.
19 Q Did others leave?
20 A No.
21 Q At that point in time?
22 A No.
23 Q You were the only one?
24 A I was the only one to my knowledge. I think
25 the environment from the impression I got at G&Z was

[ipaper docId=39605403 access_key=key-28tnns3a1fjg1hyp76jg height=600 width=600 /]

RELATED LINK:

Lender Processing Services LPS and ProVest: Resemblance is uncanny

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.

Another great post from Sarasota PI Bill Warner Florida

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Foreclosure Law Office of David J. Stern Cash’s in On Foreclosures And Goes Global On The NASDAQ With “Chardan 2008 China Acquisition Corp”.

At the closing of the business combination with Chardan, DAL will own 100% of the business and operations of Default Servicing, Inc. and Professional Title & Abstract Company of Florida and the non-legal operations supporting the foreclosure and other legal proceedings handled by the Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., collectively known as the Company.


Upon consummation of the transaction, Beijing, China-based Chardan will change its name to DJSP Enterprises, Inc. “DJSP” (David J. Stern Processing), and its stock is expected to trade on the Nasdaq under the symbols DJSP, DJSPU, and DJSPW. Assuming no redemptions by Chardan shareholders, the current owners of the company, the “Stern Parties” will receive approximately $111 million from DAL and the right to receive another $35 million in post-closing cash. In addition, “Stern Parties” will also hold equity interests.  Kerry Propper, Chardan’s chief executive officer said, “The acquisition should generate significant value for our shareholders. David J. Stern, who will be DJSP’s CEO, has an impressive record building this business by continually strengthening the customer relationships on which it is based.”

DJSP Enterprises, Inc. “DJSP” (David J. Stern Processing)…Revenues increased from approximately $116 million in 2007 to an estimated $259 million in 2009; EBITDA adjusted on a pro forma basis increased from approximately $44 million in 2007 to an estimated $68 million in 2009; Net Income adjusted on a pro forma basis increased from approximately $28 million in 2007 to an estimated $43 million in 2009, excluding one-time transaction expenses related to the business combination;



For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the company, DJSP Enterprises, generated revenue of approximately $117 million, EBITDA adjusted on a pro forma basis of approximately $35 million and net income adjusted on a pro forma basis of approximately $22 million.


So, Mr. Stern, how does the ‘foreclosure mill” of the David J. Stern law office net $49 miilion in 2009 when you bid on and obtains”bundles” of foreclosures from Wells Fargo Bank or Deutsche Bank and process’s each foreclosure for a flat fee of $1,400 which covers the cost  of an associate attorney, processing, service of complaint, office help etc.?  I know for a fact that the cost of processing a Foreclosure Complaint has increased since 12th Judicial Circuit Chief Judge Lee Haworth stopped  Attorneys “calling in” on Foreclosure Complaints in 2009 and forced Stern Associates to actually drive from Plantation Fl to Bradenton or Sarasota to appear in person.


“The area’s top judge has lost patience with so-called foreclosure mills so he’s ordering them to appear in court. Non-local law firms that specialize in mass foreclosure filings have ignored local court procedures, filed incomplete or inaccurate court documents and “widely abused” the privilege of appearing at court hearings by telephone, 12th Judicial Circuit Chief Judge Lee Haworth said. He’s cracking down, requiring lawyers in foreclosure cases filed in Manatee, Sarasota and DeSoto counties to attend all foreclosure-related hearings in person”.

DJSP…NASDAQ
Last Sale $ 11.66
Change Net / % 0.27 2.26%
Today’s High / Low $ 11.97 / $ 11.35
Share Volume 157,831
Previous Close $ 11.93
52 Wk High / Low $ 12.66 / $ 6.90
Shares Outstanding 10,634,000
Market Value $ 123,992,440
Annualized Dividend N/A
Beta 0.4
NASDAQ Official Open Price: $ 11.97
Date of NASDAQ Official Open Price: Mar. 26, 2010
NASDAQ Official Close Price: $ 11.75
Date of NASDAQ Official Close Price: Mar. 26, 2010
 

 
The David J. Stern Law Office and one of it’s process serving companies “Provest” have been sued in Conn for falsifing court documents, claiming the initial Complaint was served on the correct owner of the Florida property when in fact it never was, another case of “sewer service“.  A “John Grisham Novel” has nothing on the activities of the David J. Stern Law Offices.

 
SEE.. CONNECTICUT MAN FILES MASSIVE LAWSUIT AGAINST DAVID J. STERN LAW FIRM & ATTORNEY KARINA MUSELLA OF PLANTATION FL FOR ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE.

 
ALSO SEE.. THOUSANDS OF HOMEOWNERS ARE ILLEGALLY FORECLOSED ON BY DEUTSCHE BANK, IN FLORIDA LAW OFFICE OF DAVID J. STERN LEADS THE PACK,  FBI IS INVESTIGATING !

 
SEE.. LAW OFFICE OF DAVID J. STERN MISTAKENLY FILES FORECLOSURE ON FLORIDA FAMILY, INCLUDES FEDERAL TAX LIEN OF ANOTHER MAN & SERVES US ATTORNEY, HOW STUPID

 
SEE.. David J. Stern Law Offices “CASH IN ON FORECLOSURES” With Sewer Service and Bid Rigging on Homes Sold on The Court House Steps, FBI Needs to Investigate

 
SEE.. ATTORNEY FOR DAVID J. STERN LAW OFFICE IN MONTHS LONG FLORIDA BAR INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN FIRED OR RESIGNED, SARASOTA JUDGE AND US ATTORNEY TAMPA SUGGEST LEGAL ACTION AGAINST STERN LAW OFFICE IN BOTCHED FORECLOSURE CASE.

 
SEE.. The Foreclosure Mills of Florida led by The David J. Stern Law Offices.

 
India Infoline News Service, Mar 20, 2010.
DAL Group completes business combination with Chardan 2008 China Acquisition Corp.  The principals of FlatWorld Capital in Hyderabad and New York and DAL Group worked over the last two years to develop a long-term strategic plan with management and entered into a letter of intent with DJSP in 2008….DJSP is David J. Stern Processing.

FlatWorld Capital LLC, a Hyderabad and New York based global private equity firm, and its affiliates announced that their affiliated subsidiary, DAL Group, LLC, has completed a business combination with Chardan 2008 China Acquisition Corp. (a British Virgin Islands based Special Purpose Acquisition Company), DJS Processing, LLC, Professional Title and Abstract Company of Florida, LLC and Default Servicing, LLC to become DJSP Enterprises, Inc…… all of these companies are run by the Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A in Plnatation Fl, see additional information below from the Florida Division of Corporations;


1). PROFESSIONAL TITLE AND ABSTRACT COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC
2). DJS PROCESSING LLC
3). DEFAULT SERVICES, INC.
4). DJSP ENTERPRISES, INC.
5). ATTORNEYS’ TITLE AGENCY, P.A.
6). LAW OFFICES OF DAVID J. STERN, P.A.
7). STERN HOLDING COMPANY – PT, INC. 

The principals of FlatWorld Capital in Hyderabad and New York and DAL Group worked over the last two years to develop a long-term strategic plan with management and entered into a letter of intent with DJSP in 2008, subsequently contributed the letter of intent to DAL Group, LLC in May 2009 and consummated the transaction on January 15, 2010.

DJSP, is David J. Stern Processing, is the largest provider of processing services for the mortgage and real estate industries in Florida and one of the largest in the United States. The Company provides a wide range of processing services in connection with mortgages, mortgage defaults, title searches and abstracts, REO (bank-owned) properties, loan modifications, title insurance, loss mitigation, bankruptcy, related litigation and other services.

The Company’s principal customer is the Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., whose clients include all of the top 10 and 17 of the top 20 mortgage servicers in the United States, many of which have been customers for more than 10 years. The Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., Company has approximately 1,000 employees and contractors and is headquartered in Plantation, Florida, with additional operations in Louisville, Kentucky and San Juan, Puerto Rico.

The Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., Company’s U.S. operations are supported by a scalable, low-cost back office operation in Manila, the Philippines that provides data entry and document preparation support for the U.S. operation. The Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A.,  Company generated revenues of approximately $260 million and adjusted net income of $45 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.

Raj K. Gupta, Partner of FlatWorld Capital LLC, said, “FlatWorld Capital is excited about investing in the mortgage processing and legal process outsourcing industry  (Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., ) where we have significant expertise. We look forward to working with all stakeholders to bring significant value add to this opportunity. We will continue to apply our team’s SPAC and global offshoring expertise to similar investment opportunities in the future.”

What an excellent investigation: Thank you Mr. Warner from W.B.I Inc in Sarasota

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Foreclosure Mill Law office of David J. Stern is now DJSP Enterprises, Inc. “DJSP” (David J. Stern Processing)…their revenues increased from approximately $116 million in 2007 to an estimated $259 million in 2009; EBITDA adjusted on a pro forma basis increased from approximately $44 million in 2007 to an estimated $68 million in 2009; Net Income adjusted on a pro forma basis increased from approximately $28 million in 2007 to an estimated $43 million in 2009.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the company, DJSP Enterprises, generated revenue of approximately $117 million, EBITDA adjusted on a pro forma basis of approximately $35 million and net income adjusted on a pro forma basis of approximately $22 million.

So how does the ‘foreclosure mill” of the David J. Stern law office net $49 miilion in 2009 when they bid on and obtain “bundles” of foreclosures from Wells Fargo Bank or Deutsche Bank and process’s each foreclosure for a flat fee of $1,400 which covers the cost of an associate attorney, processing, service of complaint, office help etc.? I know for a fact that the cost of processing a Foreclosure Complaint has increased since 12th Judicial Circuit Chief Judge Lee Haworth stopped Attorneys “calling in” on Foreclosure Complaints in Feb. 2009 and forced Stern Associates to actually drive from Plantation Fl to Bradenton or Sarasota to appear in person.

Chardan 2008 China Acquisition Enters Into Business Combination With DAL Group, David J. Stern Law office, DJSP Enterprises, Inc – Update gone public on the NASDAQ.

Chardan 2008 China Acquisition was run by Kerry S. Propper he has had some problems with the SBA and the Department of Justice as did his father Dr. Richard D. Propper.  Kerry S, Proper, Richard D. Propper and Royale Holdings own 1,151,128 shares of Chardan 2008 China Acquisition, they are the majority share holders of the company now directly linked to David J. Stern and DJSP Enterprises, Inc.

CHARDAN 2008 CHINA ACQUISITION CORP.

Shareholders Number of  Ordinary Shares  and Warrants
Kerry Propper 302,907
Steve Urbach 136,713
Jonas Grossman 81,296
George Kaufman 27,708
Todd Gold 5,542
Jiangnan Huang 261,427
Royale Holdings 661,693
Dr. Richard D. Propper 186,528
Paula Beharry 130,713
Daniel Beharry 130,713
Li Zhang 130,713
Li Gong 25,000
Dr. Jianjun Shi 25,000
Xiaosong Zhong 25,000
Carman Ramirez 20,000
Edward Carter 5,000
Ida Carter 5,000

Foreclosure Mill in Plantation Fl run by David J. Stern Law office (DJSP Enterprises, Inc).,  just recently went Public on the NASDAQ, David J. Stern has 1/3 ownership of the stock with Kerry S. Propper 1/3 and “Royale Holdings 1/3.
1). Kerry S. Propper was the subject of 2003 Federal law suit filed in Conn. by the Small Business Administration one of his co-defendants was Acorn Ct Investments LP, they all ended up paying the SBA $1,764,333 in total see link http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/04D0487P.pdf

2). Kerry S. Propper was/is under Dept of Justice investigation with his father Richard Propper. One of their partners was convicted of defrauding the SBA and sent to Federal prison for 70 months. SBA seeks to recover $96 million from Richard Propper and the rest of the crew in yet another SBA lawsuit, see info below……

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 29, 2006, U.S. Files Suit Against John Torkelsen, Richard Propper, Daniel Beharry, & Sovereign Bank Alleging Fraud of $32 Million Against the Small Business Administration

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department announced today that it has filed a lawsuit accusing John Torkelsen, Richard Propper, Daniel Beharry, and Sovereign Bank of defrauding the Small Business Administration’s Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program of $32 million. The suit was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania under the False Claims Act, which allows the United States to recover up to three times the amount of its losses plus civil penalties.

The government’s complaint alleges that Torkelsen, Propper and Beharry violated the conflict of interest and management fee rules of the SBIC program by engaging in multiple secret transactions that funneled government money into companies controlled by Propper and Beharry or Torkelsen and his family. The SBIC program has rules designed to prevent the unauthorized investment of government funds in companies controlled by those who act as managers of the SBICs. The alleged fraud is believed to be the largest perpetrated upon the program to date.

The SBIC program, administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration, was created in 1958 to fill the gap between the availability of venture capital and the needs of small businesses in start-up and growth situations. The government, itself, does not make direct investments or target specific industries. Rather, the SBIC program is a “fund of funds” – meaning that portfolio management and investment decisions are left to qualified private fund managers. Small businesses which qualify for assistance from the program are able to receive equity capital, long-term loans and expert management assistance.

The investigation of the fraud allegations against the defendants was conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s office in Philadelphia, Pa.; the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Office of Inspector General and Office of General Counsel; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and the Justice Department’s Civil Division. The United States has settled with, or reached settlement in principle with, a number of other individuals or entities involved in the alleged fraud.

Published January 12, 2007 Kerry S. Propper is an executive at both SPACs.
http://www.smartmoney.com/investing/economy/blind-pool-danger-20640/

Richard Propper  father), a physician and venture capitalist who had started an array of businesses, including Medibuy.com, a Website for marketing medical supplies. Propper subsequently launched two more bulletin-board-traded SPACs — Chardan North China Acquisition (CNCA) and Chardan South China Acquisition (CSCA). He serves as chairman of the former and chief financial officer of the latter.

Propper is head of Chardan Capital, a San Diego-based venture capital firm. His son Kerry S. Propper, who is an executive at both SPACs, heads the similarly named Chardan Capital Markets, a New York-based broker-dealer and investment?bank.

The elder Propper has an eventful investment history. In the early ’90s, he resigned as the managing general partner at Montgomery Medical Ventures, a venture-capital firm controlled by Montgomery Securities, amid reports that he inadvertently disclosed to a family member inside information about a Montgomery-related transaction (SEC investigation). He now says only that the incident “had nothing to do with anything.”

In 1996, meanwhile, he settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission over allegations that, as a general partner of two Montgomery funds, he failed to disclose holdings and transactions in several public companies. He says it was simply a matter of bookkeeping issues.

If this history has cast a shadow over Origin’s shares, an early recovery is hardly likely in view of new litigation. On Dec. 29, the Justice Department filed a civil suit in federal court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Propper, his partner Daniel Beharry, their former partner John Torkelsen and Sovereign Bancorp, alleging they’d defrauded the Small Business Administration of $32 million.

That suit is running parallel to a civil action filed by the SBA in early 2005. In that action, the government alleges the same plaintiffs (Kerry S. Propper) funneled SBA money through Acorn Technology Fund, a small-business investment company, to their own?companies. Among other things, it contends that Propper loaned money to Acorn to finance Medibuy, that Acorn repaid him with SBA money, and that Propper-related partnerships received more than $800,000 from Acorn. In June, Torkelsen began serving a 70-month prison sentence after pleading guilty to making false statements to the SBA.

A Justice Department spokesman says the government aims to recover up to $96 million from the defendants in its suit. In interviews last week, Propper and Beharry called the allegations in the suits “baseless.” Sovereign says none of its current employees are involved.

Propper puts the whole blame on Torkelsen: “It was his doing completely. He’s in jail. The SBA didn’t oversee him as well as they could have, and they’re just angry at the fact that money was lost.” Torkelsen’s attorney didn’t return calls for comment.

As for Origin, Propper still does shareholder-relations work for the company. In an answer to e-mailed?questions from Barron’s, Origin’s chief financial officer, Jeff Wang, declined to comment on the stock-price decline or the litigation, other than to state that Origin isn’t named.

Wang noted that Origin’s revenues in the six months ended June 30 were $65 million and net income was $13 million, sharply higher than five years earlier, and that proprietary products now account for 10% and a growing portion of sales. And, he says, Origin remains focused on acquisitions. Read more: Blind-Pool Danger at SmartMoney.com http://www.smartmoney.com/investing/economy/blind-pool-danger-20640/#ixzz0jfavgysX

By its Order of January 17, 2003, this (Federal) court placed Acorn Technology Fund, L.P. (“ATF”) in Receivership and appointed the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) as Receiver. http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/04D0487P.pdf

Pursuant to powers granted under the Receivership Order, the SBA undertook the task of marshaling the assets of ATF and conducting all business affairs of ATF. This included making written demand upon certain limited partners of ATF for arrearages on investor agreements.

On October 29, 2003, after the Defendants (Kerry S. Propper et al) failed to meet their contractual obligations, the SBA, in its capacity as Receiver for ATF, brought separate actions against eight individual defendants and one corporate entity alleging breach of contract. The court consolidated all the cases on January 27, 2004. In response to the SBA’s demands, all defendants filed answers, affirmative defenses and counterclaims against both ATF and the SBA.

The Defendants allege claims for fraud in the inducement against ATF and negligence against the SBA. After being courted as potential investors by John Torkelsen, president and manager of Acorn Technology Partners, L.L.C. (“ATP”), the general partner of ATF, the Defendants entered into investment agreements (“Subscription Agreements”) for a partnership interest in ATF. In the Subscription Agreement, each defendant contracted to purchase a limited partnership interest in ATF and to make certain capital contributions to the partnership

For the foregoing reasons, the SBA’s Motions to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaims are Granted and the Defendants are ordered to pay the SBA as listed below; ATF is a New Jersey limited partnership pursuant to the Certificate of Limited Partnership filed with the Secretary of State of New Jersey on September 29, 1997.

The total amount demanded by the SBA from Defendants is $1,764,333. The following are the individual arrearage amounts per defendant(s):
• Acorn Connecticut Investments, L.P. and Daniel Beharry: $670,000
• Kenneth Borow: $25,000
• MichAel Chermak: $100,000
• Timothy Garton: $26,000
• William Lerach: $750,000
• Kerry Propper: $25,000
• Richard Propper: $128,333
• Charles Smith: $40,000

David J. Stern with DJSP Enterprises, Inc., recently went Public on the NASDAQ, David J. Stern has 1/3 ownership of the stock with Kerry S. Propper 1/3 and “Royale Holdings 1/3.

DJSP Enterprises, Inc Ownership, Number of Ordinary Shares, Percentage of Ownership
David J. Stern (2) -0- -0- 4,151,666 OR 33.15%
Kumar Gursahaney -0- -0- -0- -0-
Juan V. Ruiz -0- -0- -0- -0-
Matthew S. Kayton -0- -0- -0- -0-
Mark P. Harmon -0- -0- -0- -0-
Nicholas H. Adler -0- -0- -0- -0-
Jerry Hutter -0- -0- -0- -0-
All Directors and Officers as a Group -0- -0- -0- -0-
Kerry Propper (3) 680,875 6.17% 4,151,666 OR 33.15%
Royale Holdings(4) 661,693 6.21% 4,151,666 OR 33.15%

US Small Business Admin v. Propper, et al
Plaintiff: US Small Business Admin
Defendants: Richard D. Propper (father), Acorn Ct Investments LP, Kerry S. Propper (son), P. Timothy Garton, Michael D. Chermak, Charles R. Smith and Kenneth M. Borow
Case Number: 3:2009mc00204
Filed: June 22, 2009
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office [ Court Info ]
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Judge Robert N. Chatigny
Nature of Suit: Other – None
Cause: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

 

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.