Wells Fargo Bank N.A. headed to trial – Wells Fargo attempts to Enforce Fake Promissory Note(s),” as the amended complaint lists a cadre of characters in the securitization chain - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. headed to trial – Wells Fargo attempts to Enforce Fake Promissory Note(s),” as the amended complaint lists a cadre of characters in the securitization chain

Posted on28 September 2016.

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. headed to trial – Wells Fargo attempts to Enforce Fake Promissory Note(s),” as the amended complaint lists a cadre of characters in the securitization chain

In the wake of the massive Wells Fargo Bank N.A. fake-bank-account scam, and Gretchen Morgenson’s September 21, 2016, New York Times piece, In Wells Fargo’s Bogus Accounts, Echoes of Foreclosure Abuses connecting the bogus account practices to Wells’ misconduct in connection with mortgages, and mortgage backed securities, attached are pleadings concerning a case headed for trial against Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (as Trustee for SARM 2004-5) and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC  demonstrating that Wells Fargo and Nationstar are attempting to enforce a fake promissory note. The case has gone to appeal, was sent back to the lower court on remand, and is headed for trial. The amended complaint setting out the fake promissory note(s) is Exhibit 1 of the Attached Motion to Amend prior to trial.

 

Baroni v Wells Fargo, Nationstar Et Al Motion to Amend With SAC by DinSFLA on Scribd

Filed Reply Baroni v Wells Fargo, Nationstar by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. Seidler v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA | FL 1stDCA – Because the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support reestablishment of the lost page of the note or to prove the original plaintiff’s standing to enforce the note at the time the foreclosure action was filed JASON P. SEIDLER and MELISSA C. SEIDLER, Appellants, v. WELLS...
  2. RODRIGUEZ vs WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. | FL 4DCA – the bank failed to prove it had standing to enforce the note DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH...
  3. 575 ADAMS, LLC v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA | FL3DCA – 575 Adams seeks a writ of certiorari quashing the trial court’s order granting Wells Fargo Bank’s motion for a protective order, which prevents 575 Adams from deposing the only witness listed to testify on Wells Fargo’s behalf, Nathan Shue (“Shue”), Wells Fargo’s servicer’s corporate representative 575 Adams, LLC, Petitioner, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc.,...
  4. IN RE PATTERSON, Bankr. Court, NC | Wells Fargo has not complied with the lost note provisions …not demonstrated it’s entitled to enforce the Note   In re: JOEL HAMPTON PATTERSON, III, KAREN YVETTE PATTERSON,...
  5. FL 5th DCA Appeal Reverses “Trial Court Acted Prematurely, Note Endorsed to Non-Plaintiff Wells Fargo” KHAN v. BANK OF AMERICA SHAKIL KHAN AND DINA KHAN, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D10-3288...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11561 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

176,085 spam blocked by Akismet