US Bank National Association v. Swink | HAWAII ICA - There is no admissible evidence establishing that US Bank was in possession of the blank endorsed Note at the time the complaint was filed. VACATED & REMANDED!

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

US Bank National Association v. Swink | HAWAII ICA – There is no admissible evidence establishing that US Bank was in possession of the blank endorsed Note at the time the complaint was filed. VACATED & REMANDED!

US Bank National Association v. Swink  | HAWAII ICA – There is no admissible evidence establishing that US Bank was in possession of the blank endorsed Note at the time the complaint was filed. VACATED & REMANDED!

H/T Dubin Law Offices

034978438 by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-18 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 9081 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives