Related posts:

1. MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Brennan | Hawaii ICA – MTGLQ concedes that there is no evidence of record of the original plaintiff (BOA’s) standing as holder of the original Promissory Note when the complaint for foreclosure was filed…. VACATED h/t Dubin Law Offices 034935589 by DinSFLA on Scribd ©...
2. FANNIE MAE v AMARAL | HAWAII ICA – Here OneWest did not attach the Note to its Complaint and the Declariation fails to establish, or even mention that OneWest possessed the Note at time it filed its Complaint … Order & Judgment VACATED! Congratulations to DUBIN LAW OFFICES 034924951 (1) by DinSFLA on...
3. Magaldi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company | bank relies to some extent on the assignment, but the assignment was dated 2010—after suit was filed—and does not offer any indication of whether the bank held the note endorsed in its favor or in blank when it commenced the subject litigation DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH...
4. Angelini v. HSBC USA, N.A. | FL 4DCA – Bank here failed to introduce evidence that it held (through the possession of the blank-indorsed paper) the note, as opposed to merely owned the note, when the foreclosure complaint was filed. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH...
5. U.S. Bank National Association v. Smith | Hawaii ICA – TILA Claims on SOL & UDAP – Vacated and Remanded IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF...