PIERRE V. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. | ILL DC – the collector’s silence about the significant risk of losing the ironclad protection of the statute of limitations renders the letter misleading and deceptive as a matter of law. - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

PIERRE V. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. | ILL DC – the collector’s silence about the significant risk of losing the ironclad protection of the statute of limitations renders the letter misleading and deceptive as a matter of law.

Posted on07 February 2018.

PIERRE V. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. | ILL DC – the collector’s silence about the significant risk of losing the ironclad protection of the statute of limitations renders the letter misleading and deceptive as a matter of law.

h/t DUBIN LAW OFFICES

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

RENETRICE R. PIERRE,
Individually and on Behalf
of others Similarly
Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT,
INC., a Kansas Corporation,
Defendant.

USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-02895-1 by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. Hammer v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. | Chicago Jury Returns $2Million Verdict for Homeowner United States District Court Northern District of Illinois – CM/ECF...
  2. Artis v. District of Columbia | Supreme Court – “Tolling” State claims Statute of Limitations period is suspended during the pendency of the federal suit h/t Dubin Law Offices   SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED...
  3. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Royal Blue Realty Holdings, Inc | NYSC – The Court held that plaintiffs foreclosure action was time-barred because it filed the instant action after the six-year statute of limitations period expired DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR AMERICAN HOME...
  4. Midland Funding LLC v Joya Valentin | NYSC – lacks the requisite knowledge to lay the proper foundation to establish the documents, the credit card agreement and the credit card statement, are business records of the original creditor. Decided on May 9, 2013 District Court of Nassau County,...
  5. WELLS FARGO v SWAINE | NYSC – Young Law Group, PLLC Beats NY Mortgage Statute of Limitations, Again! Wells Fargo’s Failed Attempt to Revoke Acceleration. Judith Swaine (2016)-Mot. Seq. 001- Mtd Sol- 20170505 Sfo Dismissal...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11558 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,759 spam blocked by Akismet