Emigrant Mortgage v. Costa | NJ Court Allows ‘Swindled’ Homeowner’s Fraud Defense in Foreclosure Case - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Emigrant Mortgage v. Costa | NJ Court Allows ‘Swindled’ Homeowner’s Fraud Defense in Foreclosure Case

Posted on20 September 2017.

Emigrant Mortgage v. Costa | NJ Court Allows ‘Swindled’ Homeowner’s Fraud Defense in Foreclosure Case

NJ LAW Journal-

A New Jersey appeals court has ruled that a Burlington County woman in danger of losing her home to foreclosure can challenge the action by claiming that she took out a loan for home improvement work that was never done.

In a case that began nearly nine years ago, a three-judge Appellate Division panel, in an unpublished decision in Emigrant Mortgage v. Costa released on Monday, overturned a Burlington County Superior Court judge’s decision to dismiss Costa’s affirmative defenses against Emigrant Mortgage Co.’s foreclosure efforts.

Judges William Nugent, Heidi Currier and Richard Geiger, however, refused to reinstate Costa’s counterclaims seeking damages against Emigrant.

[NJ LAW JOURNAL]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. MASS. | Pinti v. Emigrant Mortgage Co. | Given our conclusion that the foreclosure sale was VOID . . . The declaratory judgment of the Superior Court and the orders allowing Wilion’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint are reversed. SJC-11742 LINDA PINTI & another1 vs. EMIGRANT MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.,...
  2. Emigrant Mtge. Co., Inc. v Patton | NYSC “EMC assigned the mortgage to Emigrant Savings in March 2008, but did not assign the note until December 2010” SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF...
  3. Costa v. Deutsche Bank | NYSD – granted summary judgment (i) in favor of their RPAPL Article 15 claim seeking the cancellation and discharge of record of the Mortgage, a declaration adjudging the Property to be free from an encumbrance arising from the Mortgage, and a declaration discharging Plaintiffs’ obligations under the Note UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VITO...
  4. Defense denies standing in Foreclosure Fraud case Think about this when you read this article: 1. Did...
  5. Emigrant Sav. Bank -Brooklyn / Queens v Doliscar | NY Appeals Court – Thus, the allonge presented a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff was the holder or assignee of both the note and mortgage prior to its commencement of this action Decided on January 28, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11558 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,819 spam blocked by Akismet