Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Webster | Thus, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, that it had standing to commence this action.

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Webster | Thus, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, that it had standing to commence this action.

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Webster | Thus, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, that it had standing to commence this action.

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Webster (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

View original: From the court   |   Our backup

Here, although the plaintiff appended a copy of the note to the complaint, the plaintiff’s submission of two different copies of the note with different endorsements in support of its motion for summary judgment fails to eliminate a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff was in possession of the original note at the time the action was commenced,.   Thus, the plaintiff failed to establish, prima facie, that it had standing to commence this action.

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8405 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives

Please Support Me!

All Of These Are Troll Comments