re: PA Public Schools Employees’ vs BAC | Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Decision – how Bank of America has known that Countrywide, MERS assignments were no good – yet they continued to argue they were good in court - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

re: PA Public Schools Employees’ vs BAC | Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Decision – how Bank of America has known that Countrywide, MERS assignments were no good – yet they continued to argue they were good in court

Posted on01 November 2015.

re: PA Public Schools Employees’ vs BAC | Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Decision – how Bank of America has known that Countrywide, MERS assignments were no good – yet they continued to argue they were good in court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NO: 11-CV-00733-WHP
__________________________________________
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OF LEAD PLAINTIFF, PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Down Load PDF of This Case

__________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

11 Civ. 733 (WHP)
————————————x
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
individually and on behalf ofall others similarly
situated,
Plaintiff,

-against-

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et aI.,
Defendants.
————————————

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. SLORP V. LERNER, Sampson & Rothfuss (“LSR”) | Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss DENIED and DENIES Defendants LSR and Shellie Hill’s Motion to Dismiss S.D. OHIO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO...
  2. Bank of America Loses Foreclosure Class Action Motion to Dismiss in New Jersey – BEALS v. BOA NEWARK, NJ, November 7, 2011 – Today Judge Katherine S....
  3. Judge denies motion by Bank of America’s Countrywide unit to dismiss security fraud claims by FHFA Bloomberg- Bank of America Corp.’s Countrywide Financial unit must face...
  4. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA STRIKES AGAIN! Plaintiff’s Opposition to MERS Motion for Summary Judgment and their Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT...
  5. Riddle v. Bank of America Corp. (BAC) | PA Dist. Court – Respa, Private mortgage insurance providers in exchange for a kickback claims “Plaintiffs’ allegations that Defendants dressed up an illegal scheme to...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11558 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


2 Responses to “re: PA Public Schools Employees’ vs BAC | Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Decision – how Bank of America has known that Countrywide, MERS assignments were no good – yet they continued to argue they were good in court”

  1. aron says:
    11/01/2015 at 6:41 am

    bank of America crooks should be made to explain their manufactured made up fraudulent mortgage assignments.
    this bank hurt many homeowners and stole many homeowners
    homes using this fake mortgage assignment that judges of the
    court knew were fraud but still gave the banksters illegally the people homes

  2. Charles Reed says:
    11/01/2015 at 6:45 am

    The reason the BOA assignment for Countrywide Ginnie Mae pooled loans are no good, is the same reason that Wells Fargo assignments of Washington Mutual Bank Ginnie Mae assignment are no good and that is they are forged.

    Before there was a transfer of the loans the Dept of VA loans & the FHA loan had already transferred the mortgage loan Notes endorsed in blank. Ginnie Mae has taken physical possession of the Notes causing there to be a void of authority because the Notes have been forever separated from the debt.

    We got a breach of contract where there cannot be a lien against the properties because a sale of the loan did not and could not occur because Ginnie Mae is not authorize by Congress to purchase these debts!

    There been a Whistleblower claim on recorded about this since Feb 12, 2012, that was submitted by me, yet the Federal Government not taken action to recover with treble damage $264 billion!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,825 spam blocked by Akismet