re: PA Public Schools Employees' vs BAC | Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Decision - how Bank of America has known that Countrywide, MERS assignments were no good – yet they continued to argue they were good in court

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

re: PA Public Schools Employees’ vs BAC | Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Decision – how Bank of America has known that Countrywide, MERS assignments were no good – yet they continued to argue they were good in court

re: PA Public Schools Employees’ vs BAC | Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Decision – how Bank of America has known that Countrywide, MERS assignments were no good – yet they continued to argue they were good in court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NO: 11-CV-00733-WHP
__________________________________________
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OF LEAD PLAINTIFF, PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Down Load PDF of This Case

__________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

11 Civ. 733 (WHP)
————————————x
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
individually and on behalf ofall others similarly
situated,
Plaintiff,

-against-

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et aI.,
Defendants.
————————————

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8538 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

2 Responses to “re: PA Public Schools Employees’ vs BAC | Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Decision – how Bank of America has known that Countrywide, MERS assignments were no good – yet they continued to argue they were good in court”

  1. aron says:

    bank of America crooks should be made to explain their manufactured made up fraudulent mortgage assignments.
    this bank hurt many homeowners and stole many homeowners
    homes using this fake mortgage assignment that judges of the
    court knew were fraud but still gave the banksters illegally the people homes

  2. Charles Reed says:

    The reason the BOA assignment for Countrywide Ginnie Mae pooled loans are no good, is the same reason that Wells Fargo assignments of Washington Mutual Bank Ginnie Mae assignment are no good and that is they are forged.

    Before there was a transfer of the loans the Dept of VA loans & the FHA loan had already transferred the mortgage loan Notes endorsed in blank. Ginnie Mae has taken physical possession of the Notes causing there to be a void of authority because the Notes have been forever separated from the debt.

    We got a breach of contract where there cannot be a lien against the properties because a sale of the loan did not and could not occur because Ginnie Mae is not authorize by Congress to purchase these debts!

    There been a Whistleblower claim on recorded about this since Feb 12, 2012, that was submitted by me, yet the Federal Government not taken action to recover with treble damage $264 billion!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives