HSBC Bank v. Donaghy | Superior Ct. of PA – There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

HSBC Bank v. Donaghy | Superior Ct. of PA – There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement

Posted on09 October 2014.

HSBC Bank v. Donaghy | Superior Ct. of PA – There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
PENNSYLVANIA

HSBC BANK, NA AS TRUSTEE
Appellee

v.

AMY C. DONAGHY
Appellant

EXCERPT:
Accordingly, viewing the record in the light most favor able to the non- moving party and resolving all doubts as the existence of a genuine issue of material fact against the moving party, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on its foreclosure complaint. There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement.

Judgment reversed. Case remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished.

 

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. Foerster v. REGENT BANK, Fla 4th DCA | whether appellee complied with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage to provide pre-suit notice of acceleration   JEFFREY FOERSTER and TAUNYA FOERSTER, Appellants, v. REGENT BANK,...
  2. Duke v. HSBC – Fla. 4th DCA “Genuine issues of material fact remain in dispute regarding the owner and holder of the note and mortgage” DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH...
  3. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. Blank | Ohio Appeals Court – question of fact remains as to whether appellee complied with the notice provisions contained in the mortgage 2014-Ohio-4135 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOIS M....
  4. Serrano v. HSBC | Fla 4th DCA – Summary Judgment REVERSED – Dispute Related to Condition Precedent to Foreclosure  DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH...
  5. Freiday v. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Fla 4DCA | there remains a material issue of fact as to whether OneWest complied with Paragraphs 15 and 22 of the mortgage   ANN FREIDAY, Appellant, v. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee. No....

This post was written by:

- who has written 11558 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,829 spam blocked by Akismet