HSBC Bank v. Donaghy | Superior Ct. of PA - There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

HSBC Bank v. Donaghy | Superior Ct. of PA – There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement

HSBC Bank v. Donaghy | Superior Ct. of PA – There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
PENNSYLVANIA

HSBC BANK, NA AS TRUSTEE
Appellee

v.

AMY C. DONAGHY
Appellant

EXCERPT:
Accordingly, viewing the record in the light most favor able to the non- moving party and resolving all doubts as the existence of a genuine issue of material fact against the moving party, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on its foreclosure complaint. There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement.

Judgment reversed. Case remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished.

 

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8687 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives