MCLEOD vs. NANCY PERRY (SABR) et. al. | Quiet Title **GRANTED** against a Securitized Trust by DEFAULT

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

MCLEOD vs. NANCY PERRY (SABR) et. al. | Quiet Title **GRANTED** against a Securitized Trust by DEFAULT

MCLEOD vs. NANCY PERRY (SABR) et. al. | Quiet Title **GRANTED** against a Securitized Trust by DEFAULT

via MSFRAUD

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

KENNETH MCLEOD and CAROL ANN
MCLEOD, a married couple,
Plaintiffs,

vs

NANCY PERRY et. al.
Defendants.

This matter, having regularly come before the Honorable Kirby Kongable, based
on Plaintiff s Application for Entry of Default and Affidavit of Default filed with
the Clerk of the Court on September 18, 2008 against defendant Securitized Asset
Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-NC2 (“SABR”) having been duly entered,
and, the Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default filed with this Court on November
17th, 2008 the Court finds as follows:

1.Defendant SABR was properly served by personal service;
2.Defendant SABR failed to file an Answer or other responsive
pleading;
3.Plaintiffs are the owner of the subject property pursuant to a Joint
Tenancy Deed dated February 5, 2002 and filed with the Maricopa
County Recorder on February 8, 2002 as document number
20020140427.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:

That the subject property is hereby awarded to, and title quieted in
favor of Plaintiffs Kenneth McLeod and Carol Ann McLeod. The
subject property is located at 2538 East Virgo Place, Chandler AZ
85249 and described as follows:

1. Lot One Hundred Fourteen (114), Circle G at Riggs Homestead
Ranch Unit III, according to the plat of record in the office of the
County Recorder ofMaricopa County, Arizona, in Book 421 ofMaps,
Page 10 and Certificate of Correction Recorded as 1997-192959, of
Official Records.

2. That Defendant SABR is permanently enjoined and prohibited from
recording any documents affecting or purporting to affect title of the
subject property; and, any acts or recordings now or in the future by
Defendant SABR relating to the subject property shall be of no force
or effect.

3. The Court has expressly determined there is no just reason for delay
and expressly directs entry of this final Judgment as set forth herein.
DONE IN OPEN COURT this 24 day of November, 2008.

Han. Kirby Kongable

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8684 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives