THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE, SENATE BILL 1666 AND THEIR "REFORM" OF FORECLOSURE LAWS….WATCH OUT CONSUMERS AND WAKE UP!

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE, SENATE BILL 1666 AND THEIR “REFORM” OF FORECLOSURE LAWS….WATCH OUT CONSUMERS AND WAKE UP!

THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE, SENATE BILL 1666 AND THEIR “REFORM” OF FORECLOSURE LAWS….WATCH OUT CONSUMERS AND WAKE UP!

via Matt Weidner Law-

The Florida Senate has now weighed in with their version of foreclosure “reform” and WOW is it a treasure chest of juicy, wonderful stuff.

They want to dramatically change the rules for foreclosure, not just for all those new mortgages that might be executed after the bill is passed but…

Matt Weidner Law

URGENT CALL TO ACTION, FLORIDA SENATE TO VOTE ON BILL 1666—CONTACT SENATORS TODAY!

This very bad bill is coming up…call senators this week…

[MATT WEIDNER LAW]

Copy of the Bill below

[ipaper docId=129383919 access_key=key-o79e31n4iydowjzrsvq height=600 width=600 /]

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8687 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

3 Responses to “THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE, SENATE BILL 1666 AND THEIR “REFORM” OF FORECLOSURE LAWS….WATCH OUT CONSUMERS AND WAKE UP!”

  1. No matter what court in what ever state, justice is hard to find and bad law is enabling the crime to go on .

    Open letter to Janet and everyone interested in justice.

    This morning on March 8, 2013, I, Shelley Ann Erickson, witnessed Judge Gary R. Tabor in his court room in Thurston County, ruling against a motion to give Janet Reiner and her attorney Ha Dao permission to have Janets securitiezed promissory note examined for authenticity by James Maddison Kelly, whom has been approved to be an expert witness in two other cases. Ha argued this should be welcomed by the court and the West One attorney to put to rest of the world West One was not in the business of fabricating documents. What appeared to be extremely telling of Judge Tabor’s bias to West One’s firm objection to proving the truth of this alleged document being the original document or “NOT”, judge Tabor disappointingly denied the citizens of Washington from discovering West One had standing in the court or “NOT” and weither or “NOT” West One was forging counterfiet documents as one of WEST ONES employees had already testified in
    http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/02/24/kaboom-mcdonald-v-onewest-evidentiary-hearing-we-have-discovered-today-that-there-are-two-versions-of-the-original-note-are-you-now-aware-of-that/

    http://new.livestream.com/accounts/2292674/events/1752571
    case of wet stamp endorsing photo copies of originals and having more than one original. West One employees have been flat out caught conterfieting notes. Janets case has: http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/01/06/full-deposition-of-northwest-trustee-services-jeff-stenman/ http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/01/06/full-deposition-of-northwest-trustee-services-yvonne-mcelligott/ assignments that two NW Trustee employees have testified to admitting they were making false statements on the assignments to Janets mortgage, to what appears to be unlawful siezure of Janets home. What would be the harm if West One has the original note? Why would the judge not want proof of West One having standing.? Is standing important in the court room or “NOT”? West One Attorney testified James Maddison Kelly has a sign at his place of business stating most documents by the banks are frauds. attempting to discredit him as a biased party. When four out of four counties that have been audited Wilkenson County in Texas , Kings County in California, Essex County in Mass, and _______________________________, with all audits stating between 74 percent to 85 percent of the assignments in the county records are invalid frauds and one hundred percent of the PSA’s are invalid. James Maddison Kelly’s sign appears to be stating the outrageous truth and not a biased statement. In any case it appears Judge Tabor was not willing to chance the truth to come out and West One objected to proving the note was authentic or not and would not leave the note in the courts hands. West Ones lawyer telling the judge he was not comfortable with leaving the note in the courts hands. WHY? The court obviously trust the banks the bank does not trust the judge to have the NOTE Or a possible counterfeit of the note. If I were an attorney I would send a motion of Affirmation of proof of Authority to Represent to the lawyer holding the alleged note or” NOT NOTE”, that appears to be a counterfeit the West one attorney does not want exposed. I am not an attorney, however this would put the lawyer for One West on the line for knowingly misrepresenting OneWest, which it appears the judge and the One West Bank Lawyer do not wish to establish. I have witnessed ever ytime there is a deposition of any one bank employee fraud and deception have been exposed. I have yet to read a deposition of any one bank employee that has witnessed the banks were not committing fraud and deception. So I find the judge and the West One lawyer not wanting to allow an expert to examine the note on Janets mortgage very telling! and very questionable. My sons case has the lawyers in the hot seat due to that motion. The Lane Powell firm sent my son a letter asking for him to approve they were representing Countrywide, instead of BOA, RECONTRUST , MERS AND
    Countrywide. Which my son objected to approving this and sent the letter into the Appeals court as admission of misrepresentation,
    I would like to add in the James McDonald V Onewest Bank, Judge Robert S Lasnik, gave permission for an evidentiary hearing to discover the truth. As expected and as usual the evidentiary hearing made discovery of what appears to be not only one but two counterfeit endorsed by wet stamp notes. I stand as never witnessing any discovery that proves that any one of the banks were not committing fraud and deceit. Judge Lasnik gave both the for-closers and the plaintiffs a chance to prove fraud or not”! Thankyou judge Lasnik. Washington citizens appreciate a fair and unbiased judge willing to prove the truth.. Perhaps the oath of office the judge should have available in his or her chambers should be attached to the motions.

    http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2013/02/24/kaboom-mcdonald-v-onewest-evidentiary-hearing-we-have-discovered-today-that-there-are-two-versions-of-the-original-note-are-you-now-aware-of-that/

    http://new.livestream.com/accounts/2292674/events/1752571

    http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2020458364_foreclosurerulingxml.html

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/127585821/Dr-James-M-Kelley-Declaration-Loan-Docs-Produced-by-JPMorgan-Chase-Bank-NA

    This WA State Case is helpful to all states and the attorneys in this state are very happy over this ruling/http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/KLEM-vs-WAMU-QUALITY-LOAN.pdf

    http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/KLEM-vs-WAMU-QUALITY-LOAN.pdf

  2. Oops been a long day forgot to make two changes Williamson county and Gullford County, Kings County and Essex County are the four out of four counties to find massive fraud.

  3. JIMI says:

    JUDGES THAT ARE UNFAIR AND COMITT TREASON AGAINST HOMEOWNERS OF FLORIDA BY REFUSING TO GIVE THEM DUE PROCESS OF LAW MUST BE REMOVED
    IMMD .ITS ALREADY BAD WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH BANKS FRAUD ,ROBO-SIGNING ETC WE SHULD NOT HAVE TO ALSO DEAL WITH HEARTLESS JUDGES THAT BREAK THE LAWS

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives