“If judges are going to accept the spoils of big money politics, they must accept a new duty: deciding when to step aside to assure justice. After all, judges are supposed to be accountable to the Constitution, not special-interest supporters. They take an oath to deliver due process under the law without regard to who voted for them or spent the most to help elect them.”
– Justice at Stake Executive Director, Bert Brandenburg
~
The Honorable Judge Carolyn Ellsworth has some EXPLAINING to do if you ask me. Judge tosses mortgage ‘robosigning’ case against LPS employees in Vega.
~
“I have represented many clients being investigated by the Attorney General’s
Office over the past 30 years and I do not recall a single instance in which the
Office requested or subpoenaed a client for a sworn statement in a civil case of
this type.”
-
__________________________________________________________
-
Snell & Wilmer LLP
One Arizona Center
Phoenix, AZ 85004
5/9/12 $500.00>>MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS Report Period # 1 - Foreclosure processor fights Nevada attorney general’s robosigning …
www.vegasinc.com/…/foreclosure-processor-fights-nevada-attorney-...
Motion to Dismiss – Lender Processing Services
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View
Jan 30, 2012 – SNELL & WILMER Lt .P. … Information Services, Inc. (“FNIS”), LPSDefault Solutions, Inc. (“Default Solutions”) and ….. KMPG LLP, 122 Nev
Harry Mohney – Executive Profile
Harry W. Mohney is associated with several companies, including 1045 5ST-Mb, LLC, Dallas Crossing, LLC and Deja Vu Showgirls-Sacramento, LLC. and is …
Harry Mohney – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Harry Mohney (born May 30, 1943) is the founder of Déjà Vu, a U.S. company which (as of 2006) owns about 75 strip clubs in 16 U.S. states, as well as one club …
Contributions to a Nevada Judge Basis for Disqualification
Nevada Judge Steps Aside Again in Light of Campaign Contributions
Nevada District Judge Brent Adams has recused himself from a case for the second time after concerns that campaign money he received from one of the parties created an “appearance of impropriety.”
.
To Ensure Fair Courts, Group Urges Strong Recusal Rules
Citing an explosion of big spending on judicial elections as
documented by Justice at Stake, the Center for American Progress
has issued a policy paper entitled, “Strong Recusal Rules Are Crucial
to Judicial Integrity.”
Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg called for more rigorous recusal rules in a Chicago Tribune op-ed in September 2011. He wrote:
“If judges are going to accept the spoils of big money politics, they must accept a new duty: deciding when to step aside to assure justice. After all, judges are supposed to be accountable to the Constitution, not special-interest supporters. They take an oath to deliver due process under the law without regard to who voted for them or spent the most to help elect them.”
2 Responses to ““Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED?”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
[…] “Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED? […]
[…] UPDATE: “Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED? […]