"Order in the Court!" Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED?

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

“Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED?

“Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED?

“If judges are going to accept the spoils of big money politics, they must accept a new duty: deciding when to step aside to assure justice. After all, judges are supposed to be accountable to the Constitution, not special-interest supporters. They take an oath to deliver due process under the law without regard to who voted for them or spent the most to help elect them.”

– Justice at Stake Executive Director, Bert Brandenburg

~

The Honorable Judge Carolyn Ellsworth has some EXPLAINING to do if you ask me. Judge tosses mortgage ‘robosigning’ case against LPS employees in Vega.

~

Greenberg Traurig  
8400 N.W. 36th Street  
Miami, FL 33166
9/21/12 $500.00 
>>MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS Report Period   # 3

R E A L I T Y  C H E C K
The letter is from Barry Richard, a well-connected lawyer at Greenberg Traurig (he was part of the Bush 2000 team in Florida.) Richard attacks June Clarkson for her conduct during a meeting with his client. Specifically, he felt she was too aggressive with her questioning. In the key sentence he says:

“I have represented many clients being investigated by the Attorney General’s

Office over the past 30 years and I do not recall a single instance in which the

Office requested or subpoenaed a client for a sworn statement in a civil case of

 this type.”

__________________________________________________________

Fox Rothchild LLP  
2000 Market St., 20th Floor  
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291
9/27/12 $250.00
>>MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS Report Period   # 3
SCRIBD

LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.,
 a Delaware corporation,Plaintiff,
v.
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO,
in her official capacity as
Attorney General of the
State of Nevada.
Defendant.
.
Counsel for the Plaintiff:

MARK J. CONNOT (10010)
KEVIN M. SUTEHALL (9437)
JOHN H. GUTKE (10062)
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway,
Suite 500Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: 702-262-6899
Facsimile: 702-597-5503
  1. __________________________________________________________
  2. Snell & Wilmer LLP 

    One Arizona Center  
    Phoenix, AZ 85004
    5/9/12 $500.00 

    >>MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS   Report Period   # 1  
  3. Foreclosure processor fights Nevada attorney general’s robosigning 

www.vegasinc.com/…/foreclosure-processor-fights-nevada-attorney-...

Jan 31, 2012 – LPS is represented in the lawsuit by the law firm Snell & Wilmer LLP in Las Vegas and the firm Berger Singerman in Miami. LPS is based in 

Motion to Dismiss – Lender Processing Services

www.lpsvcs.com/LPSCorporateInformation/…/20120130_Motion_N…

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View
Jan 30, 2012 – SNELL & WILMER Lt .P.  Information Services, Inc. (“FNIS”), LPSDefault Solutions, Inc. (“Default Solutions”) and ….. KMPG LLP, 122 Nev

__________________________________________________________

He threw her $1,000

Harry Mohney – Executive Profile

NV – 1045 5ST-Mb, LLC, Dallas Crossing, LLC and Deja Vu Showgirls-Sacramento, LLC

Harry W. Mohney is associated with several companies, including 1045 5ST-Mb, LLC, Dallas Crossing, LLC and Deja Vu Showgirls-Sacramento, LLC. and is 

Harry Mohney – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Harry Mohney (born May 30, 1943) is the founder of Déjà Vu, a U.S. company which (as of 2006) owns about 75 strip clubs in 16 U.S. states, as well as one club 


__________________________________________________________

Contributions to a Nevada Judge Basis for Disqualification

The question of Judge Gonzalez’s impartiality stems from five political contributions
made in 2010 to Judge Gonzalez for his successful November 2010 reelection – $5,000
from Phil Ivey, $1,000 from Phil’s divorce attorney, David Chesnoff, $2,500 from
Chesnoff’s wife, $1,000 from Chesnoff’s law partner, and $500 from Attorney John
Spilotro . . .
Nevertheless Nevada law bars judges from presiding over cases in which they have
“actual bias or prejudice for or against one of the parties.”  . . .
The Nevada Supreme Court has taken this a step further by holding that a recusal 
would be a necessary step to alleviate or obviate” even the appearance of 
impropriety,  while the Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct has held that “a judge is
disqualified whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
However the Nevada Supreme Court, following the U.S. Supreme Court in Caperton
v. A. T.  Massey Coal Co., 129 S. Ct. 2252 (2009), has expressly rejected proposals
that would dictate what amount of political contribution would give rise to a judicial
disqualification….

Nevada Judge Steps Aside Again in Light of Campaign Contributions

 March 30th, 2012 | Category: Recusal

 

 

Nevada District Judge Brent Adams has recused himself from a case for the second time after concerns that campaign money he received from one of the parties created an “appearance of impropriety.”

.

SEE ALSO: 

To Ensure Fair Courts, Group Urges Strong Recusal Rules

November 20th, 2012 | Category: Recusal

Citing an explosion of big spending on judicial elections as 

documented by Justice at Stake, the Center for American Progress 

has issued a policy paper entitled, “Strong Recusal Rules Are Crucial 

to Judicial Integrity.”

__________________________________________________________

Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg called for more rigorous recusal rules in a Chicago Tribune op-ed in September 2011. He wrote:

“If judges are going to accept the spoils of big money politics, they must accept a new duty: deciding when to step aside to assure justice. After all, judges are supposed to be accountable to the Constitution, not special-interest supporters. They take an oath to deliver due process under the law without regard to who voted for them or spent the most to help elect them.”

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8604 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

2 Responses to ““Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED?”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] “Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED? […]

  2. […] UPDATE: “Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED? […]


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives