New robo-signing brief: Misconduct by AG Masto's office could 'seriously damage public confidence' in that office

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

New robo-signing brief: Misconduct by AG Masto’s office could ‘seriously damage public confidence’ in that office

New robo-signing brief: Misconduct by AG Masto’s office could ‘seriously damage public confidence’ in that office

Damage comes too late. “Seriously Damage Public Confidence” across all 50 State AG offices. We were sold out!

UPDATE:Order in the Court!” Should this conflicted Judge have already RECUSED?

Nevada Journal-

New evidence bearing on allegations that Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto and her top deputies engaged in repeated and systemic prosecutorial misconduct to indict two Lender Processing Services employees is scheduled to go before Nevada’s Eighth Judicial District Court today.

Defense attorneys for the employees say photographs now submitted to the court provide “potent proof” of the falsity of sworn testimony by Masto’s former chief deputy and head criminal prosecutor in the case, John P. Kelleher — as well as the falsity of assurances that Masto’s office gave to the court.

Gary Trafford and Gerry Sheppard, two LPS title officers, were indicted by a Clark County grand jury in November 2011 on charges of so-called robo-signing “forgery,” having authorized certain LPS employees they supervised to sign the title officers’ names to legal documents.

[NEVADA JOURNAL]

[ipaper docId=127474807 access_key=key-23h19yidrb98qoexpzie height=600 width=600 /]

 

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8538 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

2 Responses to “New robo-signing brief: Misconduct by AG Masto’s office could ‘seriously damage public confidence’ in that office”

  1. marilyn lane says:

    How come cases don’t get tossed when five NY appeallate judges change the dates of court documents in order to rule ilegally for Fidelity . What goes with Fidelity that they have the power to make judges disobey the suuprmacy clause of the US Constitution. This is another Fdelity case too.Big difference in attitude

  2. marilyn lane says:

    That word in my below post was iILLEGAL.
    tHE BANKS HACKERS CHANGED THAT WORD.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives