Attorney For Goldman Sachs CEO Is Eric Holder's 'Best Friend'


Attorney For Goldman Sachs CEO Is Eric Holder’s ‘Best Friend’

Attorney For Goldman Sachs CEO Is Eric Holder’s ‘Best Friend’

The crony connections just keep on coming over at Eric Holder’s Department of Justice.


Last week, the Justice Department announced that it will not prosecute Goldman Sachs or any of its employees in a financial probe. 

Could that be because the attorney for Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein was none other than Attorney General Eric Holder’s “best friend” and former personal attorney, Reid Weingarten?

 Or because in 2008, Goldman Sachs employees donated  $1,013,091 to Barack Obama?

 Or because Goldman Sachs is the former client of Eric Holder’s and Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer’s law firm, Covington & Burling?


But also take a good look at the MERS trademark documents below, especially the very top of page 3 where it names Covington & Burling the sender of what appears to be a fax allegedly in 1998 for “MERSCORP Inc.”. The documents were signed in 2003, 3-4 years after MERS’ 1999?s date via Fmr. V.P. W. Hultman’s secretary Kathy McKnight [PDF link to depo pages 29-39].

[ipaper docId=70528719 access_key=key-2d3d8493odiku19mmpgx height=600 width=600 /]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



This post was written by:

- who has written 9151 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

2 Responses to “Attorney For Goldman Sachs CEO Is Eric Holder’s ‘Best Friend’”

  1. Charles Reed says:

    Back in Aug 2010 I talked with William Hultman who told me he was a lawyer and that I did not know what i was talking about when I was telling him that Wells Fargo was not the lender to my mortgage loan and that they were in title incorrectly and that in the State of Nebraska MERS was not and is still not register to do business in the state.

    So MERS how can you be the beneficial party for Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) after or even before Sept 25, 2008 the day the FDIC declared it a “failed bank”? So if WaMu has relinquish all their financial interest in the loans they have put into Ginnie Mae pools then how does a MERS think they can be the sole beneficiary for Ginnie Mae who by law is not a lender and cannot act as a lender and cannot even accept payment from the borrowers because they did not buy the mortgage loan so there is no way to have a lien against a property.

    It check & mate!

  2. Charles Reed says:

    If this was China and all this destruction happen William Hultman would be in some serious trouble. How can we go 4yrs prosecuting Barry Bond & Roger Clemens but there is up to $32 trillion dollars in offshore accounts and nobody but a mortgage loan officer in Cleveland is in jail for a fraudulent $100,000 loan when trillions of dollars were made, but only Joe Blow is jailed.


Leave a Reply

Advertise your business on