(In)validity and (in)admissibility of out-of-state documents and affidavits: the CPLR 3212/2309(c) - RPL 299-a ‘Bermuda triangle’

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

(In)validity and (in)admissibility of out-of-state documents and affidavits: the CPLR 3212/2309(c) – RPL 299-a ‘Bermuda triangle’

(In)validity and (in)admissibility of out-of-state documents and affidavits: the CPLR 3212/2309(c) – RPL 299-a ‘Bermuda triangle’

Isn’t this about 95% of all foreclosure cases? Hmm the other 5% in case a foreclosure mill has to make one ASAP in-house!


Listen up folks, this could be the start of a new storm!

Reuters-

You represent the plaintiff-assignee on motion for summary judgment  under Civil Practice Law and Rule 3212 in a commercial mortgage foreclosure action. Your “affirmation of regularity” is supported by a complaint verified in New Jersey.  The assignment was effected and acknowledged, in Pennsylvania, under a power of attorney notarized in California.  All documents – the power of attorney, the assignment of mortgage and the verification – were properly executed in the jurisdictions where they were signed. 

So “all of your [predicate legal] ducks are lined up.”  No heavy lifting here. File the motion and “judgment day” is near. (Sorry for the mixed metaphors.)  But wait a minute!!  None of the documents signed outside the state contain the so-called “certificate of conformity” required by CPLR 2309(c) and Real Property Law § 299-a.  Was the assignment of the mortgage effective? And is your evidence in admissible form? 

[REUTERS]

© 2010-14 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.






Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. MAINE SJC “Untrustworthy Affidavits, MERS” | HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES v. MURPHY et al. MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. v. DANA...
  2. Analysis: Foreclosure “mess” unfolds state by state By Dan Levine SAN FRANCISCO | Thu Sep 30, 2010...
  3. FANNIE MAE: Servicer Review of Procedures Relating to the Execution of Affidavits, Verifications, and Other Legal Documents Hope this comes out as I am not using a...
  4. WISCONSIN ‘Flawed Affidavits, SJ Reversed” BANK OF NEW YORK (BONY) v. CANO BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE-HOLDERS CWABS,...
  5. Bank Fails to Rebut Satisfaction’s Validity Created By Notary’s Acknowledgment; FORECLOSURE DENIED! -Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Moise Via: FRAUD DIGEST ROBO-SIGNER The trial court opinion was published...

This post was written by:

- who has written 7013 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “(In)validity and (in)admissibility of out-of-state documents and affidavits: the CPLR 3212/2309(c) – RPL 299-a ‘Bermuda triangle’”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] title clearing, Notary, NTC, out-of-state, Real Property Law § 299-a, Rule 3212 Important: This post earlier goes hand in hand with this Abigail’s story, must read both if you haven’t yet: [...]


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Chip Parker, www.jaxlawcenter.com
RR Compliance Consulting Inc was established to provide training and support services to the Loss Mitigation Consulting Community.  There is a huge void in the market for this training since those who are truly practicing in the field have neither the time nor interest in providing this training.
Jamie Ranney, www.NantucketLaw.pro
LATEST TOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD CASES OPINIONS
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives