BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, filed a Notice of Cancellation with the Florida Department of State stating it was no longer transacting business in Florida - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, filed a Notice of Cancellation with the Florida Department of State stating it was no longer transacting business in Florida

BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, filed a Notice of Cancellation with the Florida Department of State stating it was no longer transacting business in Florida

Mortgage Fraud

BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

Bank of America

Action Date: August 11, 2011
Location: Tallahassee, FL

On July 11, 2011, BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, filed a Notice of Cancellation with the Florida Department of State stating it was no longer transacting business in Florida.

From July 11, 2011 to August 11, 2011, this company initiated hundreds of foreclosure actions throughout Florida, filing 76 Lis Pendens in Palm Beach County; 61 Lis Pendens in Hillsborough County; 35 Lis Pendens in Lee County; and 107 in Broward County.

It will come as a real surprise, no doubt, to the hundreds of people in Florida who have been sued for foreclosure by BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, in the past 30 days that they are “no longer conducting business in Florida.”

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11558 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, filed a Notice of Cancellation with the Florida Department of State stating it was no longer transacting business in Florida”

  1. Eugene Villarreal says:

    Chase Home Finance, LLC (CHF) also cancelled business in New Jersey as June 16, 2011 and the rest of the country as of June 2011 because the OCC gave them permission to merge with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.(JPM). I have just one question for Lynn and DinSFLA.
    CHF has forclosed on many, many homes in New Jersey and most likely throughout the country as the Plaintiff in the Complaints stating that they were the successor by MERGER with JPM with no assignments and thereby the owners of the mortgage/note years prior to this official merger in June 2011, wouldn’t this fraudulent statements presented to the courts and the judges accepting these fraudulent statements as evidence constitute PERJURY ? Even when a judge questions this alleged merger in court and still accepts it as fact even though both parties to the merger survived and rules in favor of Plaintiff(bank). I believe, but not sure, that all those forclosed homeowners could come back and reopen their cases because of the fraud.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives