© 2010-12 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved. www.StopForeclosureFraud.com
Related posts:
- MASSIVE RULING TO PROTECT CALIFORNIA HOMEOWNERS FROM NON JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE: MABRY v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY CODE 2923.5 From: b.daviesmd6605 PUBLISHED OPINION AT THE APPEALS LEVEL FOR CC 2923.5....
- Tear Down these Foreclosure Mill WALLS…SUPREME COURT!! Keep ExPosing NET WORTH!!! Tear Down these Foreclosure Mill WALLS…SUPREME...
- ARE FORECLOSURE MILLS Coercing Buyers for BANK OWNED homes? ARE ALL THE MILLS? MASTER_OFFER_PACKET_03-10-2010[1][1] In the Master Packet above go to Page 7...
- SENATE FINDS MASSIVE FRAUD WASHINGTON MUTUAL: SPECIAL DELIVERY FOR WAMU VICTIMS! Senate finds Massive FRAUD in SHam-MU! WaMu has allegedly defrauded...
- Foreclosure Law Update Mills Warning about "The Good, The Bad and The Ugly" “”Le Bon, la Brute et le Truand”” [scribd id=31444734 key=key-1ef5g1l94fwlgqb3b85l...
I’m not an attorney. I read many of the posted articles and legal papers on this website. Unfortunately, I don’t always get what the final decisions mean. So, in this instance, did the court in this ruling side with the company seeking monies from the person, or did the person win in this case, Jerman v. Carlisle? It sounds like the
court is allowing the mistakes of law in favor of the mortgage company. is that true?