UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
BUREAU,
Petitioner,

v.

HARBOUR PORTFOLIO ADVISORS,
LLC; NATIONAL ASSET ADVISORS, LLC;
and NATIONAL ASSET MORTGAGE,
LLC;
Respondents.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO ENFORCE CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE
DEMANDS [1]

On November 29, 2016, Petitioner Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the
“Bureau”) petitioned this Court to enforce Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) that the
Bureau issued to Respondents on September 8, 2016. (Id.) For the reasons that follow,
the Bureau’s petition is GRANTED.

[…]

C. Undue Burden

Harbour finally argues that, even if the Bureau has the authority to issue the CIDs, the
CID it received should be modified because it is unduly burdensome. (See Dkt. 13, at 22-
24.) Specifically, Harbour contends that the length of coverage (almost seven years of
information) is overbroad and that the production deadlines (30 days) are unreasonable.
(Id.) For the following reasons, the Court finds that the CID is not unduly burdensome.