March, 2018 - FORECLOSURE FRAUD - Page 3

Archive | March, 2018

TFH 3/4/18 | Identification of the 21 Major “Standing” Issues in Foreclosure Litigation Today — With Returning Special Guest: Illinois Foreclosure Defense Attorney Douglas Matton

TFH 3/4/18 | Identification of the 21 Major “Standing” Issues in Foreclosure Litigation Today — With Returning Special Guest: Illinois Foreclosure Defense Attorney Douglas Matton

COMING TO YOU LIVE DIRECTLY FROM THE DUBIN LAW OFFICES AT HARBOR COURT, DOWNTOWN HONOLULU, HAWAII

LISTEN TO KHVH-AM (830 ON THE AM RADIO DIAL)

ALSO AVAILABLE ON KHVH-AM ON THE iHEART APP ON THE INTERNET

.

.

Sunday – March 4, 2018

 ———————
Identification of the 21 Major “Standing” Issues in Foreclosure Litigation Today — With Returning Special Guest: Illinois Foreclosure Defense Attorney Douglas Matton

 

 

 

The most important issues in state and federal court foreclosure litigation today nationwide concern “standing” — whether a plaintiff has the right to foreclose and whether the court has the power to even hear a foreclosure case.

The resolution of standing issues can often mean whether a homeowner keeps his or her home or is evicted, yet there has been little if any identification and analysis anywhere of the full spectrum of such standing issues in foreclosure litigation.

On this Sunday’s show, John and I will identify and briefly highlight all such 21 major standing issues, as time permits, with special guest, Douglas Matton, who specializes in foreclosure defense in Chicago, Illinois, currently arguing standing issues in court.

We could spend an entire show analyzing each of these issues historically and their impact on foreclosure defense.

Listeners need to determine which if any of these issues, identified and presented step by step in question form below, may impact each of them, which when properly understood can prevent the foreclosure of their home:

1. When is standing considered jurisdictionally important in foreclosure proceedings?

2. What is the difference between personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction in foreclosure proceedings?

3. When do standing issues have to be raised in foreclosure proceedings?

4. Who has the burden of proving standing in foreclosure proceedings?

5. How is standing proven in foreclosure proceedings?

6. How is standing disproven in foreclosure proceedings?

7. What are the differences regarding standing in foreclosure proceedings in federal versus state courts?

8. When is standing in prior foreclosure proceedings jurisdictional for purposes of appeal and when is it not?

9. When is standing in prior foreclosure proceedings jurisdictional for purposes of collateral litigation?

10. Can a lack of standing in foreclosure proceedings be waived or forfeited?

11. Is a violation of 12 Code of Federal Regulations 1024.39 jurisdictional?

12. Does the real party in interest doctrine impact standing in foreclosure proceedings?

13. How does the difference between principal and agent relate to standing in foreclosure proceedings?

14. How does the separation between the promissory note and the mortgage relate to standing in foreclosure proceedings?

15. How does the Uniform Commercial Code relate to standing in foreclosure proceedings?

16. How does the distinction between prudential standing and constitutional standing relate to jurisdiction in foreclosure proceedings?

17. How does the existence of a REMIC securitized trust as plaintiff relate to standing in foreclosure proceedings?

18. How does robo-signing relate to standing in foreclosure proceedings?

19. How does the distinction between standing as part of a claim for relief and as an affirmative defense relate to standing in foreclosure proceedings?

20. How does the conduct of discovery relate to standing in foreclosure proceedings?

21. What affect do third-party buyers have upon standing in post-foreclosure proceedings?

Absent an understanding of the answers to each of the above 21 questions puts homeowners at a significant disadvantage in foreclosure litigation.

These issues are especially important when attempting to get homes back that have been foreclosed on and homeowners have been evicted.

My law firm has been preparing a number of post-foreclosure lawsuits to file to recover foreclosed properties that have been foreclosed on by foreclosing plaintiffs lacking standing.

Gary Dubin

Please go to our website, www.foreclosurehour.com, and join your fellow homeowners in the Homeowners SuperPac today.

A Membership Application is posted there waiting for your support.

 

 

.
Host: Gary Dubin Co-Host: John Waihee

.

CALL IN AT (808) 521-8383 OR TOLL FREE (888) 565-8383

Have your questions answered on the air.

Submit questions to info@foreclosurehour.com

The Foreclosure Hour is a public service of the Dubin Law Offices

Past Broadcasts

EVERY SUNDAY
3:00 PM HAWAII 
5:00 PM PACIFIC
8:00 PM EASTERN
ON KHVH-AM
(830 ON THE DIAL)
AND ON
iHEART RADIO

The Foreclosure Hour 12

image: thetechsafehome.com

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

High Court to Examine Foreclosure Notice Requirements

High Court to Examine Foreclosure Notice Requirements

Law.com-

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is set to decide whether a mortgagee must issue a new notice of intent to foreclose before filing a second foreclosure complaint after its initial complaint was dismissed.

The case, JPMorgan Chase v. Taggart, potentially hinges on the application of the high court’s 2014 ruling in Wells Fargo Bank v. Spivak, which held that a mortgagee was required to provide at least 30 days’ notice to a mortgagor before filing a new complaint where the mortgagee voluntarily discontinued its original foreclosure action.

The Spivak court held that “when a residential mortgagee delivers an Act 6 notice, commences a foreclosure action against a mortgagor (‘first action’), discontinues that foreclosure action, and re-files another foreclosure action against a mortgagor for the same premises (‘second action’), the lack of a new notice prior to the second action is fatal to the second action.”

[LAW.COM]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Another 2.4 Million Equifax Customers Are About to Find Out Their Identities Were Stolen in Hack

Another 2.4 Million Equifax Customers Are About to Find Out Their Identities Were Stolen in Hack

Fortune-

Equifax Inc., the credit-reporting firm that suffered a massive data breach last year, said it will notify an additional 2.4 million U.S. consumers that they were affected by the hack.

The customers were among the 145.5 million people whose identities were stolen last year, but Equifax was unable to confirm who they were at the time because only partial driver’s license information was taken, the Atlanta-based credit-reporting company said Thursday in a statement. The consumers will be notified and the firm will offer them free credit-monitoring and identity-protection services.

Equifax disclosed the cyberattack in September, resulting in Congressional hearings and the departure of then Chief Executive Officer Richard Smith. The stock also has taken a beating, slumping 21 percent since the disclosure. Paulino do Rego Barros Jr. was named interim CEO and the company hired Jamil Farshchi from Home Depot Inc. last month as chief information security officer in an effort to boost its oversight.

“We continue to take broad measures to identify, inform and protect consumers who may have been affected by this cyberattack,” Barros said in the statement.

[FORTUNE]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Equifax possibly profiting off data breach, Sen. Warren says

Equifax possibly profiting off data breach, Sen. Warren says

CNET-

Sen. Elizabeth Warren has led the charge against Equifax for not doing enough to protect its customers before it was hit with a major data breach last year. Now she’s saying the credit reporting agency might be making money off this breach.

“Equifax may actually make money off this breach because it sells all these credit-protection devices, and even consumers who say, ‘Hey, I’m never doing business with Equifax again’ — well, good for you, but you go buy credit protection from someone else, they very well may be using Equifax to do the back office part,” Warren said in an interview with Marketplace. “So Equifax is still making money off their own breach.”

Equifax was hit with a massive data breach in September, when hackers stole data on more than 100 million consumers. Personal details like Social Security numbers and addresses were stolen, which has left those customers vulnerable to identity theft.

[CNET]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Advert

Archives