March, 2015 - FORECLOSURE FRAUD - Page 3

Archive | March, 2015

Consumer Protection: A Beginner’s Guide

Consumer Protection: A Beginner’s Guide

Consumer protection touches on a number of areas of law, and as such, has been broadly defined by Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary as “[f]ederal and state laws established to protect retail purchasers of goods and services from inferior, adulterated, hazardous, and deceptively advertised products, and deceptive or fraudulent sales practices; these laws cover everything from food to cosmetics, from banking to fair housing.”  Because laws that deal with consumer protection can be found in several different areas of law, starting one’s research in “consumer protection law” can be somewhat overwhelming.  Through this Beginner’s Guide, we hope to provide some access points to this significant field of study.

From producer to consumer. Illustration by Udo J. Keppler. (Published 1911). Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.27699

From producer to consumer. Illustration by Udo J. Keppler. (Published 1911). Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.27699

Federal and State Statutes and Regulations

Many consumer protection laws can be found in both federal and state statutes. Federal statutes can be found in the U.S. Code. You can access state statutes through our Guide to Law Online page. Indexes are generally not available online, so it helps if you know the name of the title or code which is concerned with consumer protection so you can browse that title. The organization of statutes varies by jurisdiction, but you might want to look in areas like: “commerce and trade”; “public health and welfare”; “banks and banking”; “business and professions”; “commercial codes”; “insurance”; “health and safety”; “food and agriculture”; “regulation of trade, commerce, investments, and solicitations”; “commercial relations”; “motor vehicle sales”; and, as you might expect, “consumer protection.”

Be sure to also check federal and state regulations that implement consumer protection statutes.

Case Law

You may also want to locate cases that support your claim. You can locate free case law online. In addition to searching for keywords of interest, you may want to search for cases that cite to the consumer protection statutes you have located.  Also, be sure to visit your local law library to use a legal citator like KeyCite or Shepard’s to make sure the cases you wish to rely upon have not been questioned, distinguished, overturned, or repealed by a subsequent case or statute.

Books

As always, we suggest that researchers entirely new to an area of law like this start their research by using a secondary source, like a book or journal article.  Below, please find a selection of resources from the Law Library of Congress collection that might be good options for a researcher new to consumer protection law:

Websites

In addition to the resources listed above, researchers can find a substantial amount of information and guidance on the free web, including the wealth of information included in these websites:

Source: http://blogs.loc.gov |  by

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

International White Collar Criminals Pass Through the System With Ease

International White Collar Criminals Pass Through the System With Ease

White Collar Crime

White collar crime is as old as business itself, with the pioneers of the art form resorting to crude measures to bilk others out of their hard-earned currency. One of the earliest recorded white collar crimes on record included an importer who, after taking out a loan to acquire goods for sale, planned to fake a shipwreck and make off with the goods and money. Now, plans to steal money have only grown more sophisticated, with scammers coming up with new and innovative ways to part people from their money. With insider trading, kickbacks and money laundering marring the reputation of corporations both small and large, some are coming to associate Wall Street with organized fraud and unchecked corporate greed.

The solution?

Tougher penalties for white collar crime will deter criminals. Currently, white collar crime is treated as a property crime, and jail sentences are often light or nonexistent. The law, however, is catching up to these master manipulators. Disgraced financier Bernie Madoff ran one of the longest-running Ponzi schemes in history and bilked individuals, corporations, educational institutions and charities out of billions of dollars. His triple-digit prison sentence was unprecedented and an eye-opener for anyone who was considering following in his tracks.

While there will always be white collar criminals, prevention and punishment will go a long way in stopping thieves in their tracks. Removing the opportunities for fraudsters to practice their craft is one of the best ways to deter crime. In the meantime, vigilance and justice will keep innocent people from becoming victims.

To learn more about white collar crime, check out the infographic below created by the University of Southern California’s Online Master of Law program.

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

CFPB Report Outlines Legal Violations Uncovered by Supervision

CFPB Report Outlines Legal Violations Uncovered by Supervision

H/T BeSpacific

“Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released its latest supervision report highlighting legal violations uncovered by the Bureau’s examiners. The Bureau found deceptive student loan debt collection practices, unfair and deceptive overdraft practices, mortgage origination violations, fair lending violations, and mishandled disputes by consumer reporting agencies. The report also shows that CFPB supervisory resolutions resulted in remediation of $19.4 million to more than 92,000 consumers. “We are sharing our latest supervisory highlights report with the public so that industry can see trends, examine their own practices, and be proactive to make needed changes before consumers are hurt,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “The CFPB will continue to monitor both bank and nonbank markets to ensure deception is rooted out, deficiencies are corrected, remediation is given to consumers, and violations are stopped in their tracks.” Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), the CFPB has authority to supervise banks and credit unions with over $10 billion in assets and certain nonbanks. Those nonbanks include mortgage companies, private student loan lenders, and payday lenders, as well as nonbanks the Bureau defines through rulemaking as “larger participants.” To date, the Bureau has issued rules to supervise the larger participants in the markets of debt collection, consumer reporting, international money transfer, and student loan servicing.”

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Hammond couple sue over ‘robosigning’

Hammond couple sue over ‘robosigning’

If anyone comes across the complaint, please forward via email a tip tab above this site.

 

Chicago Tribune-

A Hammond couple claim in a federal lawsuit that they were victims of “robosigning” and other predatory mortgage practices that left them facing foreclosure.

According to the lawsuit, which was filed in Lake County Superior Court a month ago and was moved to U.S. District Court in Hammond on Tuesday, Pedro and Elisa Rico bought their Hammond house in 1996.

The couple were up to date on their payments, but their lender, Green Tree Servicing, LLC, approached them about refinancing in 1999.

[CHICAGO TRIBUNE]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

[INFOGRAPHIC]: How Americans Became a Nation of Renters

[INFOGRAPHIC]: How Americans Became a Nation of Renters

[INFOGRAPHIC]: How Americans Became a Nation of Renters

American Rental History

How American became a nation of renters [INFOGRAPHIC]

This infographic came from PM Guardian.com

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

Legislation to Extend Tax Relief to Distressed Homeowners Currently in House, Senate Committees

Legislation to Extend Tax Relief to Distressed Homeowners Currently in House, Senate Committees

DS NEWS-

Two similar pieces of legislation introduced last month in the House and Senate that would extend tax relief to homeowners who are underwater on their mortgage loans have been referred to committees and are waiting to be heard.

Congressman Tom Reed (R-New York) introduced the Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act of 2015 (H.R. 1002) on February 13, and that bill is now being heard in the House Committee on Ways and Means. Two weeks later, Senators Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan) and Dean Heller (R-Nevada) introduced a similar bill (S. 608), which is currently in the Senate Banking Committee. Both bills would extend relief to homeowners on forgiven mortgage debt – the remaining mortgage balance when a borrower sells a home in a short sale to avoid foreclosure. The bills would allow homeowners to exclude the forgiven debt from federal income tax forms and not report it as earned income.

Without such legislation, distressed and underwater homeowners would be required to report the amount of mortgage debt forgiven in a short sale as taxable income.

[DS NEWS]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Montana Senate Lawmakers passes bill that would let banks off the hook for fraudulent statements

Montana Senate Lawmakers passes bill that would let banks off the hook for fraudulent statements

MT Standard-

It isn’t easy to talk about filing for bankruptcy or losing your home, but as Montana’s Legislature moves to make it more difficult for homeowners to sue the mortgage industry for deceptive practices, tongues are loosening up.

Montana Senate lawmakers have passed two bills to undo a landmark court ruling that benefited homeowners who sued big banks for mishandling mortgages. Such lawsuits often involve big banks making multiple fraudulent statements that lead distressed borrowers to assume their homes are being saved, while they’re actually sliding into foreclosure.

One of the bills would let banks off the hook for fraudulent statements. The other would limit the damages borrowers can collect.

[MTSTANDARD]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

Congressman introduces legislation to “reform” CFPB

Congressman introduces legislation to “reform” CFPB

Read this proposed legislation and weigh in with your elected:

Would take CFPB budget out of the Fed’s (i.e. legislators would control CFPB funding absolutely)
Would take authority away from Cordray and give it to a “Commission” of political appointees.

http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b4514056-bcd5-4baa-b8e0-453488d30e54&utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+federal+section&utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2015-03-10&utm_term=

H.R.1266
Latest Title: To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to make the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection an independent Financial Product Safety Commission, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Neugebauer, Randy [TX-19] (introduced 3/4/2015) Cosponsors (20)
Latest Major Action: 3/4/2015 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Current COSPONSORS(20) in the House who would strip the CFPB of authority: ALPHABETICAL, by date –
Rep Barr, Andy [KY-6] – 3/4/2015
Rep Duffy, Sean P. [WI-7] – 3/4/2015
Rep Fitzpatrick, Michael G. [PA-8] – 3/4/2015
Rep Garrett, Scott [NJ-5] – 3/4/2015
Rep Guinta, Frank C. [NH-1] – 3/4/2015
Rep Hill, J. French [AR-2] – 3/4/2015
Rep Huizenga, Bill [MI-2] – 3/4/2015
Rep Love, Mia B. [UT-4] – 3/4/2015
Rep Luetkemeyer, Blaine [MO-3] – 3/4/2015
Rep McHenry, Patrick T. [NC-10] – 3/4/2015
Rep Pearce, Stevan [NM-2] – 3/4/2015
Rep Pittenger, Robert [NC-9] – 3/4/2015
Rep Poliquin, Bruce [ME-2] – 3/4/2015
Rep Ross, Dennis A. [FL-15] – 3/4/2015
Rep Rothfus, Keith J. [PA-12] – 3/4/2015
Rep Schweikert, David [AZ-6] – 3/4/2015
Rep Tipton, Scott R. [CO-3] – 3/4/2015
Rep Wagner, Ann [MO-2] – 3/4/2015
Rep Westmoreland, Lynn A. [GA-3] – 3/4/2015
Rep Williams, Roger [TX-25] – 3/4/2015

BILL BELOW

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

7,500 Sign Up For Tax Repayment Plans To Avoid Foreclosure

7,500 Sign Up For Tax Repayment Plans To Avoid Foreclosure

CBS Detroit-

About 7,500 Detroit homeowners have entered into payment plans on their back taxes to prevent foreclosures.

Mayor Mike Duggan and Wayne County Treasurer Raymond Wojtowicz said Tuesday that thousands of others have until the end of the month to do the same.

New laws signed by Gov. Rick Snyder in December cut interest rates from 18 percent to 6 percent for homeowners behind on their taxes, reduced down payments to get into plans and put a cap on overall past due taxes.

[CBS DETROIT]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Mortgage settlements in jeopardy — Bill killing them moves quietly

Mortgage settlements in jeopardy — Bill killing them moves quietly

Journal Gazette-

Remember back in the grim days of the mortgage foreclosure crisis? Back when consumers in trouble on their mortgages told horror stories about their inability to reach a live human being at their bank? Back when borrowers would have to fax forms to Wichita on one day and Cleveland the next?

Well, if a proposed piece of legislation working its way through the Indiana House of Representatives is passed as it stands, Hoosier borrowers might find themselves right back there.

Tucked inside Senate Bill 415, on Page 55 of a 104-page bill, is a paragraph repealing language from state code that created, back in 2009, the practice of mortgage settlement conferences for troubled borrowers facing foreclosure.

[JOURNAL GAZETTE]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

NY Attorney General Schneiderman Announces Groundbreaking Consumer Protection Settlement WithTransUnion, Equifax and Experian

NY Attorney General Schneiderman Announces Groundbreaking Consumer Protection Settlement WithTransUnion, Equifax and Experian

A.G. Schneiderman Announces Groundbreaking Consumer Protection Settlement With The Three National Credit Reporting Agencies

Experian, Equifax, And Transunion, Which Maintain Consumer Credit Information On 200 Million Americans, Have Agreed To Increase Protections For Consumers Facing Credit Report Errors; Provide Second Free Annual Credit Report To Consumers

Agreement Increases Protections For Consumers With Medical Debt; Reforms Process For Correcting Report Errors; Improves Accuracy Of Reports

A.G. Schneiderman: This Agreement Will Reform The Entire Industry And Provide Vital Protections For Millions Of Consumers Across The Country

NEW YORK – Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today announced a settlement with the nation’s three leading national credit reporting agencies, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., (“Experian”), Equifax Information Services, LLC (“Equifax”), and TransUnion LLC (“TransUnion”). The agreement means the companies will improve credit report accuracy; increase the fairness and efficacy of the procedures for resolving consumer disputes of credit report errors; and protect consumers from unfair harm to their credit histories due to medical debt. All three credit reporting agencies worked cooperatively with the office to develop these critical reforms.

“Credit reports touch every part of our lives. They affect whether we can obtain a credit card, take out a college loan, rent an apartment, or buy a car – and sometimes even whether we can get jobs,” Attorney General Schneiderman said. “The nation’s largest reporting agencies have a responsibility to investigate and correct errors on consumers’ credit reports. This agreement will reform the entire industry and provide vital protections for millions of consumers across the country. I thank the three agencies for working with us to help consumers.”

“Debt collection is consistently one of our top complaints, with collection of debts not owed being the number one reason New Yorkers contact us,” said NYC Department of Consumer Affairs Commissioner Julie Menin. “Mistakes like these, illegal payday loans and other information like medical debt end up on credit reports where they can misrepresent a consumer’s creditworthiness. The agreement by Attorney General Schneiderman with the three credit reporting companies is no small feat and I applaud him for ambitiously requiring these institutional agencies to make it easier to obtain and repair one’s report.”

“Today marks a major victory for New York consumers; it has been widely reported over the last few years that there are gross inaccuracies that can be found on the average consumer’s credit report,” said Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz. “Our system puts great faith in the credit reporting agencies to serve as the de facto watch dogs of the credit market in this country and in New York State. To put it simply, the current system was failing. As Chairman of the Assembly Standing Committee on Consumer Affairs and Protection I held a hearing on the inaccuracy of credit reports in 2013 and what we found was a system that ignored errors and made it practically impossible for a consumer to repair their credit without undue hardships. This settlement should help to restore consumers’ faith in the credit reporting system and will hopefully make repairing erroneous marks on their report that much simpler. I applaud Attorney General Schneiderman for his action on this issue.”

“Problems with credit reports routinely block people’s access to housing and jobs, particularly low income people and people of color,” said Susan Shin, Senior Staff Attorney at New Economy Project. “The practices of the big three credit reporting agencies have an outsized impact on the lives of hundreds of millions of people. We applaud Attorney General Schneiderman for his leadership in challenging fundamental inequities in the credit reporting system.”

“This agreement addresses some of the most egregious problems in credit reporting that consumer advocates have complained about for many years,” said Chi Chi Wu, National Consumer Law Center staff attorney. “We commend Attorney General Schneiderman and his staff for getting these changes, which should benefit consumers enormously.”

Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion are credit reporting agencies (“CRAs”) that maintain consumer credit information on approximately 200 million consumers. The credit information is compiled by the CRAs via voluntary submissions from “data furnishers” such as banks and collection agencies. The CRAs provide credit reports to companies who then use the reports to assess consumers’ credit-worthiness. Creditors use credit reports to assign numerical ratings, called “credit scores” that are used in determining whether to grant credit and in determining the cost of credit.

Credit report errors may arise as a result of identity theft or fraud, or through the CRAs’ process of matching information provided by furnishers to individual consumer’s credit files. For example, when consumers have similar names and share other identifying information, some or all of the credit information of one consumer can become “mixed” into the file of another consumer.

A 2012 study by the Federal Trade Commission found that 26% of study participants identified at least one potentially material error in their credit reports, and that 13% of study participants experienced a change for the better in their credit score as a result of modification to their credit report after a dispute to a credit reporting agency. These findings suggest that millions of consumers have material errors on their credit reports.

The Attorney General’s settlement requires the CRAs to institute a number of reforms to increase protections for consumers, over a three year period. Many of those reforms will be instituted nationwide:

1. Improving the Dispute Resolution Process

Consumers have the right to challenge inaccurate information in their credit report by initiating a “dispute” with a CRA. Attorney General Schneiderman’s investigation of the CRAs revealed that in some cases, the CRAs use a fully-automated process in which they reduce consumers’ disputes to a three-digit code and submit the code and any documentation to the creditor. If the creditor verifies the challenged information, the CRA rejects the consumer’s dispute without conducting any further investigation.

The agreement requires that the CRAs employ specially trained employees to review all supporting documentation submitted by consumers for all disputes involving mixed files, fraud or identity theft. The agreement also requires that, for all categories of disputes, when a creditor verifies a disputed credit item through the automated dispute resolution system, the CRA will not automatically reject the consumer’s dispute, but rather, a CRA employee with discretion to resolve the dispute must review the supporting documentation.

2. Medical Debt

Over half of all collection items on credit reports are medical debts. Medical debts often
result from insurance-coverage delays or disputes. As a result, medical debt may not accurately reflect consumers’ creditworthiness.

Pursuant to the Attorney General’s agreement, the CRAs will institute a 180-day waiting period before medical debt will be reported on a consumer’s credit report. This waiting period will provide extra time to permit resolution of delinquencies that result from insurance delays or disputes. In addition, while delinquencies ordinarily remain on credit reports even after a debt has been paid, the CRAs will remove all medical debts from a consumer’s credit report after the debt is paid by insurance.

3. Increasing the Visibility of AnnualCreditReport.com

Many consumers are not aware that they are legally entitled to one free annual credit report from each CRA via AnnualCreditReport.com. Consumers searching for a credit report online frequently find a CRA’s website, and many consumers subscribe to a CRA credit monitoring service to obtain a credit report or purchase a credit report from the CRA without understanding that they can obtain a free credit report. The agreement requires the CRAs to include a prominently-labeled hyperlink to the AnnualCreditReport.com website on the CRAs’ homepages. The hyperlink must appear directly on the CRAs’ homepages or via a drop-down menu visible on the homepages.

4. Additional Free Annual Credit Report

Consumers have a statutory right to obtain one free credit report per year from each CRA. The Attorney General’s agreement requires the CRAs to provide a second free credit report to consumers who experience a change in their credit report as a result of initiating a dispute. This requirement will permit consumers to verify that the CRA made the correction to their credit report without have to pay for a second credit report.

5. Payday Loan Debt

Predatory high-interest loans made in violation of New York lending laws are often referred to as “payday loans.” New Yorkers who take these loans often have trouble paying them back, damaging their credit, and making it more difficult to obtain a credit card, get a job, or even rent an apartment. The Attorney General’s agreement prohibits the CRAs from including debts from lenders who have been identified by the Attorney General as operating in violation of New York lending laws on New York consumers’ credit reports.

6. Furnisher Monitoring

Companies that provide consumer data to the CRAs (“furnishers”) must investigate consumers’ disputes and report their findings to the CRAs. The Attorney General’s agreement requires the three CRAs to create a National Credit Reporting Working Group (“Working Group”) that will develop a set of best practices and policies to enhance the CRAs’ furnisher monitoring and data accuracy. The Working Group will develop metrics for analyzing furnisher data, including: the number of disputes related to particular furnishers or categories of furnishers; furnishers’ rate of response to disputes; and dispute outcomes. Each CRA will implement policies to monitor furnishers’ performance and take corrective action against furnishers that fail to comply with their obligations.

7. Media Campaign About Consumers’ Rights

To ensure that consumers understand their rights, the Attorney General’s agreement requires the CRAs to carry out an extensive consumer education campaign in New York via public service announcements and paid placements on television, radio, print media, and online. The campaign will be carried out over three years and will focus on consumers’ rights to: (a) obtain a free annual credit report; (b) dispute errors in their credit reports; and (c) submit documents in support of disputes. The agreement also requires the CRAs to expand the consumer education materials available on AnnualCreditReport.com, the website that consumers can use to obtain their free annual credit report.

All three credit reporting agencies cooperated in the Attorney General’s investigation and demonstrated a strong commitment to reforming practices to increase protections for consumers.

Tips for Consumers:

  • You can get a free credit report from each of the CRAs once each year.
  • To get your free report, visit www.AnnualCreditReport.com or call (877)-322-8228.
  • You can request all three credit reports at the same time, or you can request the reports separately. Spreading out the reports permits you to monitor your credit over the course of the year.
  • It is important to review your credit report regularly in order to check for errors.
  • If you find an error, you have the right to dispute the error with the CRA and with the company that provided the information.
  • You have the right to submit copies of documents that support your dispute. You may submit such documents to the CRAs online via the CRAs’ websites.
  • Watch out for websites that claim to offer “free” credit reports, but require you to subscribe to their fee-based services in order to obtain the credit report.

New York City residents who need help understanding their credit report or improving their credit score, should call 311 to find their nearest Financial Empowerment Center for free financial counseling.

This case was handled by Special Counsel Carolyn Fast, Assistant Attorney General Melissa O’Neill and Bureau Chief Jane M. Azia, all of the Consumer Frauds Bureau, and Executive Deputy Attorney General Karla G. Sanchez.

source: http://www.ag.ny.gov

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

Did Bank Complaints Result in Transfer of Foreclosure Referee?

Did Bank Complaints Result in Transfer of Foreclosure Referee?

Combing through many past pro-homeowner cases, this referee was no doubt a target of the banks to oust her!


WiseLawNY-

I have come into possession of a copy of an internal e-mail from a court attorney to a top official at the Office of Court Administration that paints an unsettling picture of bank influence in the handling of foreclosure cases in Brooklyn.

The e-mail was from Deborah Goldstein, a court attorney at the Supreme Court in Brooklyn, who for four years had been supervising conferences required by state law between banks and homeowners facing foreclosure. In her-email, Goldstein asked Judge Lawrence K. Marks, the number two official in charge of court administration throughout New York, to stop an imminent plan to move her to a pool of lawyers whose job is to help judges draft opinions.

In her e-mail, Goldstein advised Marks that Lawrence S. Knipel, the administrative judge in charge of civil cases at the Brooklyn court, was moving her out of her mini-courtroom after having received complaints “verbally made at a private meeting” with lawyers who represent banks at the settlement conferences, without providing her “any [of those] complaint(s) in writing or an opportunity to respond.”

[WISELAWNY]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Breaking News: Bank of America whistleblower to be on The Foreclosure Hour Sunday 3/8/2015

Breaking News: Bank of America whistleblower to be on The Foreclosure Hour Sunday 3/8/2015

Breaking news:

The Foreclosure Hour will have a genuine whistle blower on the show tomorrow who is going to reveal that he personally worked recently (four months ago) as part of an army of robos in one of four Bank of America mortgage assignment manufacturing factories throughout the country (he will name their locations and give vivid details including names), falsifying loan documents, signing under oath not before notaries who have been similarly false swearing, for MERS and for the Big Banks such as Chase and for Securitized Trusts such as Bank of New York Mellon, as their supposed Assistant Vice Presidents and supposed Assistant Secretaries, AFTER the Bank of America signed the AG National Settlement agreeing to stop the practice.

It is amazing the arrogance that the ruling banking class has, believing apparently true that it controls the U.S. Treasury Department and the U.S. Attorney General.

Gary the host of The Foreclosure Hour will be asking whether any of his listeners are being or have been foreclosed on as a result of such fraudulently sworn-to loan documents, including made-up allonges and falsely rubber-stamped endorsements on their promissory notes, recorded and used against them or that will be used against them in their foreclosure cases.

Gary will be asking if any state and federal judges and any state and federal legislators and any state recorders are listening and what if anything are they going to do about it or just themselves robotically accepting these false documents as evidence, ignoring one thousand years of Anglo-Saxon-American evidentiary jurisprudence.

I just cannot understand how our judges will be able to continue to kowtow and genuflect before such fraudulent evidence submitted to them by licensed banks and licensed attorneys in the future after tomorrow’s radio broadcast.

Click the link below and DO NOT MISS THIS SHOW

show time for the Pacific Time Zone will be 6:00 p.m.

show time for the Eastern Time Zone will be 9:00 p.m.

UPDATE: PODCAST HAS BEEN UPLOADED IN LINK BELOW.

In case you might need the plugin to listen to the show, you may download it here.

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD4 Comments

Court approves Bank of America’s $8.5 B mortgage pact

Court approves Bank of America’s $8.5 B mortgage pact

The Charleston Observer-

A New York appeals court on Thursday approved Bank of America’s $8.5 billion pact with investors over bad mortgages, potentially putting to rest a legal dispute that dates to 2011.

The Charlotte-based bank’s agreement covers 1.6 million loans that were packaged into securities from 2004 to 2008 by subprime lender Countrywide Financial and sold to big investors such as BlackRock. Bank of America bought Countrywide in 2008 and has since paid billions to cover lawsuits and penalties tied to the lender.

Bank of America negotiated the 2011 pact after the Countrywide loans had begun to sour. The bank has already set aside money for the agreement, but final court approval has been slow in coming.

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/banking/article12610187.html#storylink=cpy

image credit: Reuters Mike Blake

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Bruce L. Blum v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company, Americas as Trustee, et al. | FL 4thDCA – reversing for a dismissal because there was insufficient evidence that notice of default was sent

Bruce L. Blum v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company, Americas as Trustee, et al. | FL 4thDCA – reversing for a dismissal because there was insufficient evidence that notice of default was sent

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

BRUCE L. BLUM,
Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY, AMERICAS AS TRUSTEE, Unknown Spouse of Bruce L. Blum, if any, Any and All Unknown Parties Claiming By, Through, Under, and Against the herein Named Individual Defendant(s) Who Are Not Know To Be Dead or Alive, Whether Said Unknown Parties May Claim An Interest As Spouses, Heirs, Devises, Grantees Or Other Claimants, John Doe and Jane Does, As Unknown Tenants In Possession,
Appellees.

No. 4D13-4271

[ March 4, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; James W. Midelis, Senior, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562008CA005794.

James A. Bonfiglio, Boynton Beach, for appellant.

Manuel S. Hiraldo of Blank Rome LLP, Boca Raton, for Appellee-Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas As Trustee.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Deutsche Bank Trust Company, we reverse the final judgment because Deutsche Bank failed to prove that it complied with the mortgage and note’s contractual requirement to mail a notice of default to appellant as a condition precedent to foreclosure. The “breach letter” admitted into evidence did not meet the requirement in the mortgage to deliver the default notice to appellant at the “notice address,” defined in the mortgage as “the property address.” Paragraph twenty of the mortgage provides in pertinent part that “[n]either Borrower nor Lender may commence . . . any judicial action . . . that arises from the other party’s actions pursuant to this Security Instrument or that alleges that the other party has breached any provision of, or any duty owed by reason of, this Security Instrument, until such Borrower or Lender has notified the other party . . . of such alleged breach and afforded the other party hereto a reasonable period after the giving such notice to take corrective action.” Deutsche Bank’s failure to comply with the condition precedent to filing suit requires a dismissal of the case. See Holt v. Calchas, LLC, No. 4D13-2101, 2015 WL 340554, at *7 n.4 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 28, 2015) (reversing for a dismissal because there was insufficient evidence that notice of default was sent). Because we are reversing and remanding for a dismissal, we need not address appellant’s other arguments on appeal.

Reversed and Remanded.

GROSS, TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

City officials warn of another possible wave of foreclosures

City officials warn of another possible wave of foreclosures

JSONLINE-

Milwaukee officials on Thursday detailed new concerns that another wave of foreclosures is on the horizon that could damage vulnerable neighborhoods still recovering from the last housing crisis.

At issue is information that major mortgage-servicing companies have given to the city and community groups like Common Ground that suggest there are hundreds of properties that are delinquent on loans or are underwater, meaning property owners or the holder of the mortgage owe more than the home is worth.

Aaron Szopinski, the city’s housing director, sounded the alarm that Mayor Tom Barrett and the city did not want a repeat of the years following the recession.

“What we do know right now is not very good,” Szopinski told members of the Common Council’s foreclosure and abandoned homes committee. “We do not want a sequel.”

[JSONLINE]

image: youtube

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD2 Comments

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT | U.S. TRUSTEE PROGRAM REACHES $ 50 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH JP MORGAN CHASE TO PROTECT HOMEOWNERS IN BANKRUPTCY

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT | U.S. TRUSTEE PROGRAM REACHES $ 50 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH JP MORGAN CHASE TO PROTECT HOMEOWNERS IN BANKRUPTCY

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION-BAY CITY

Case No. 10-23963-dob Chapter 13

In re:

DAVID S. BELZAK, LYNDA J. BELZAK,
Debtors.

Hon. Daniel S. Opperman

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK. N.A.
RECITALS

Whereas, on October 26, 2010, David S. Belzak and Lynda J. Belzak (the “Belzaks”) filed a chapter 13 Bankruptcy Petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, captioned In re David S. Belzak and Lynda J. Belzak, Case No. 10-23963 (the “Belzaks’ Case”).

Whereas, on January 19, 2011, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) filed a Proof of Claim in the Belzaks’ Case asserting a secured claim arising out of a Home Equity Line of Credit Agreement dated September 7, 1999, executed by the Belzaks (the “Loan”). (Claims Register for Case No. 10-23963, Claim 15).

Whereas, on July 30, 2013, pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1, Chase filed a payment
change notice (“PCN”) for the Loan. (Dkt. No. 57).

Whereas, on August 7, 2013, the Belzaks objected to the PCN, and the Court sustained the objection by Order entered on September 4, 2013. (Dkt. Nos. 59 & 63).

Whereas, on November 8, 2013, the United States Trustee for Region 9 (the “United States Trustee”) filed an ex-parte motion requesting, among other things, that the Court enter an order requiring Chase to appear for an examination under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 and to produce certain documents (the “2004 Motion”). (Dkt. No. 71).

Whereas, on November 8, 2013, the Court entered an Order granting the 2004 Motion. (Dkt. No. 72).

Whereas, on November 25, 2013, Chase filed a motion for protective order seeking to modify the discovery ordered by the Court. (Dkt. No. 82).

Whereas, thereafter Chase engaged the United States Trustee in discussions to resolve the discovery disputes, and on January 10, 2014, the Court entered an Order Staying all UST-Related Proceedings. (Dkt. No. 101).

Whereas, Chase engaged K&L Gates LLP to conduct a review of its policies and practices related to PCNs and escrow matters as described further below.

Whereas, Chase has since engaged the Executive Office for United States Trustees (the
“EOUST”) in discussions concerning its policies and practices relating to PCNs and the
administration of escrow accounts for residential mortgage loans in chapter 13 bankruptcy cases as described below.

Whereas, as a result of their discussions, the Parties have reached an agreement as set forth in this Order Approving Settlement Between the United States Trustee Program and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Whereas, in consideration of the foregoing, and of the mutual promises and compromises between them, the EOUST and the United States Trustees and Acting United States Trustees for Regions 1 through 21 (collectively “the United States Trustee Program” or “USTP”), and Chase (Chase and USTP are collectively referred to here as the “Parties”) do hereby agree, stipulate and consent to the Court’s entry of this Order Approving Settlement Between the United States Trustee Program and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (this “Order”), and the Court otherwise being fully advised of the premises. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

Down Load PDF of This Case

image: Reuters

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Estero retiree suing bank after surprise foreclosure [VIDEO]

Estero retiree suing bank after surprise foreclosure [VIDEO]

Lost count of how many of these there have been.


NBC 2-

A retired policeman got the surprise of his life when he returned from vacation and found his Estero home locked up and a foreclosure sign out front.

But he says he wasn’t behind on his mortgage payments. Now he’s suing the bank and the company who he says broke into his home to chain up his doors.

It all happened last November when 66-year-old Mike Tomasovick, a retired Chicago police officer, received a call from one of his neighbors while he was out of town.

“Asked me what was going on with the house because there’s a sign in your window saying the house is vacant and unsecure,” he said.

[NBC2]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

Citigroup Checks in the Mail After Bank Bungles Foreclosure Deal

Citigroup Checks in the Mail After Bank Bungles Foreclosure Deal

Good luck locating many homeowners that were evicted!


Bloomberg-

Two years after Citigroup Inc. was punished for widespread foreclosure abuses, the bank is dealing with another misstep: Thousands of people who were entitled to settlement checks never got any money.

Citigroup missed about 23,000 borrowers who were owed compensation, said two people with knowledge of the matter. The bank is now preparing to pay them about $20 million — in amounts ranging from a few hundred dollars to as much as $125,000 — after government officials called attention to the error, said the people.

Under accords with regulators, Citigroup and other banks agreed to pay $10 billion to resolve allegations that they mishandled loan papers and robo-signed legal documents, improperly initiating hundreds of thousands of home foreclosures without reviewing each individual case. Paying borrowers was a key requirement of settlements with the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

[BLOOMBERG]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

67 year old Valrico man dies after collapsing in court during hearing against U.S. Bank Foreclosure

67 year old Valrico man dies after collapsing in court during hearing against U.S. Bank Foreclosure

Tampa Bay Times-

A 67-year-old Valrico man died Tuesday morning after collapsing in a Hillsborough courtroom during a hearing on the pending foreclosure of his home.

Frank Collelo was with his wife, Antoinette Collelo, 57, when he fell to the floor in the Hillsborough County Circuit courtroom of Judge Wayne S. Timmerman around 9 a.m., according to Cristal Bermudez, a public information officer with the Hillsborough sheriff’s office.

Bermudez said deputies administered CPR to Collelo in court until emergency services arrived and transported Collelo to Tampa General Hospital. He was pronounced dead there around 9:45 a.m.

[TAMPA BAY TIMES]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

OCWEN | Executes Letter of Intent to sell mortgage servicing rights on $45 billion of performing Agency loans || Form 8-K filing, the Company disclosed the following items related to its fourth quarter results.

OCWEN | Executes Letter of Intent to sell mortgage servicing rights on $45 billion of performing Agency loans || Form 8-K filing, the Company disclosed the following items related to its fourth quarter results.

  • Provides update on fourth quarter 2014 financial results
  • Executes amendment to Senior Secured Term Loan
  • Executes Letter of Intent to sell mortgage servicing rights on $45 billion of performing Agency loans
  • Secures replacement financing on $450 million Servicing Advance facility maturing in June

ATLANTA, March 2, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ocwen Financial Corporation, “Ocwen” or the “Company”, (NYSE:OCN), a leading financial services holding company, today reported significant updates about the Company.

As previously disclosed on February 5, 2015 in its Company Update to Stakeholders, Ocwen expects to report a loss for the fourth quarter and 2014 fiscal year.

In that Form 8-K filing, the Company disclosed the following items related to its fourth quarter results.

  • It recorded an additional $50 million expense related to its New York Department of Financial Services Settlement.
  • The Company expects to increase expenses related to uncollectable receivables and other servicing expenses by approximately $64 million. 
  • The Company expects the expense for third party monitoring costs in the fourth quarter of 2014 to be approximately $13 million.

In addition to these previously disclosed items, the Company anticipates that its fourth quarter results will be impacted by the following non-recurring items:

  • A $370 – $420 million non-cash charge to write-off goodwill.
  • The creation of a $15 million reserve relating to its remediation plan to address issues around certain erroneously dated borrower correspondence.

The above financial data is preliminary, based upon the Company’s estimates and subject to completion of the Company’s financial closing procedures. Moreover, this data has been prepared on the basis of currently available information. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has not audited or reviewed, and does not express an opinion with respect to, this data. This data does not constitute a comprehensive statement of the Company’s financial results for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the Company’s final numbers for this data may differ materially from these estimates.

Ocwen will file a Form 12b-25 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for an extension of time enabling the Company to file its 2014 Form 10-K on or before March 17, 2015, without penalty. Ocwen requires this extension to complete its goodwill valuation analysis and its financial closing procedures and to ensure appropriate disclosure of various recent events impacting the Company.

Upon finalizing fourth quarter and full year 2014 results the Company expects to host a call with the investment community.

2015 Other Events and Updates

So far in 2015, the Company has been executing on its previously announced plans to sell certain assets, reduce interest rate risk and further improve liquidity. Steps include:

  • On March 2, 2015 the Company entered into an amendment to its $1.3 billion Senior Secured Term Loan (SSTL) to remove certain restrictions on asset sales and permanently increase a financial covenant. Ocwen has agreed to an accelerated repayment schedule for cash received from asset sales.  

“We are pleased with the actions of our term loan investors. They have been supportive of Ocwen and recognize the importance and benefit of executing on our strategy. Additionally, their willingness to enter into an amendment with Ocwen is an affirmation that the Company is, and always has been, in compliance with all of its SSTL covenants,” said Ronald M. Faris, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ocwen. 

  • The Company signed a letter of intent with a buyer on the sale of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) on a portfolio consisting of approximately 277,000 performing Agency loans owned by Fannie Mae with a total unpaid principal balance of approximately $45 billion. Subject to a definitive agreement, approvals by Fannie Mae and FHFA and other customary conditions, Ocwen expects the transaction to close by mid-year and the loan servicing to transfer over the course of the second half of 2015.
  • Including its previously announced $9.8 billion MSR sale to Nationstar, Ocwen is on track to sell Agency MSRs relating to approximately $55 billion of unpaid principal balance in the next six months for prices significantly above its estimated carrying value at December 31, 2014. Ocwen currently anticipates that these transactions will generate approximately $550 million of proceeds over the next six months and accelerate Ocwen’s strategy to reduce the size of its Agency servicing portfolio.
  • Ocwen awarded a sale of non-performing and performing loan assets to an undisclosed buyer. The transaction is subject to typical closing conditions, including finalizing due diligence and a definitive agreement. Total proceeds are expected to be approximately $40 million, and the Company expects the transaction to close by the end of March. The book value of the assets is approximately $26 million.
  • On February 27, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with a global financial institution to provide replacement financing on Ocwen’s $450 million OFSART servicing advance facility should the existing lender seek not to refinance the facility upon its maturity in June 2015. This agreement is subject to definitive documentation and other customary funding conditions.

In its Company Update to Stakeholders on February 5, 2015, Ocwen provided numerous updates on the Company. Below are a number of additional updates:

  • Based on Ocwen’s current engagements with state regulators, the Company is not aware of nor anticipating any material fines, penalties or settlements. Ocwen still expects to resolve two open legacy matters for a total of less than $1 million. Ocwen is not aware of any pending or threatened actions to suspend or revoke any state licenses.
  • Since January 1, 2015, Ocwen has had an average daily cash balance of over $215 million and continues to forecast that it will have sufficient liquidity going forward.
  • Ocwen believes that the SSTL amendment shows that there is no event of default and there has not been any event of default under Ocwen’s SSTL. Ocwen has publicly refuted a number of times the allegations made by a purported noteholder of certain Home Loan Servicing Solutions advance financing notes which admits it is pursuing a strategy of shorting Ocwen’s stock. Ocwen continues to vigorously defend itself against the claims of this short seller.
  • In addition to the $55 billion in transactions noted above, the Company continues to look at additional asset sales and plans to complete other small or large transactions throughout the year.
  • The Company no longer expects to execute its first call rights transaction in the first quarter of 2015, but it still anticipates closing call right transactions in the year. In the near-term, we believe this strategy will still generate positive gains for the Company, although they are likely to be lower than initially forecasted.
  • On February 27, 2015, Ocwen commented on its receipt of two notices that would terminate the Company as the servicer of two private label RMBS trusts relating to 0.07% of Ocwen’s overall servicing portfolio. These two trusts were part of the 119 transactions referenced in the February 5, 2015 Company Update to Stakeholders. We anticipate that these terminations will result in a $0.5 million gain for Ocwen as the recovery of deferred servicing fees will more than offset the loss of the servicing asset. The Company has also learned that the same trustee concluded its voting process for at least one other RMBS trust (of the 119) and in that case, the certificateholders elected to retain Ocwen as the servicer.
  • Ocwen has hired Moelis & Company and Barclays Capital Inc. to support the Company and to advise regarding adjustments to its capital structure, as appropriate. Additionally these advisors are helping the Company explore its strategic options.

About Ocwen Financial Corporation

Ocwen Financial Corporation is a financial services holding company which, through its subsidiaries, is engaged in the servicing and origination of mortgage loans. Ocwen is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with offices throughout the United States and support operations in India and the Philippines. Utilizing proprietary technology, global infrastructure and superior training and processes, Ocwen provides solutions that help homeowners and make our clients’ loans worth more. Ocwen may post information that is important to investors on its website (www.Ocwen.com).

Forward Looking Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain. Forward-looking statements involve a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: adverse effects on our business as a result of recent regulatory settlements; reactions to the announcement of such settlements by key counterparties; increased regulatory scrutiny and media attention, due to rumors or otherwise; uncertainty related to claims, litigation and investigations brought by government agencies and private parties regarding our servicing, foreclosure, modification and other practices; any adverse developments in existing legal proceedings or the initiation of new legal proceedings; our ability to effectively manage our regulatory and contractual compliance obligations; our ability to execute on our strategy to reduce the size of our Agency servicing portfolio; the adequacy of our financial resources, including our sources of liquidity and ability to fund and recover advances, repay borrowings and comply with debt covenants; our servicer and credit ratings as well as other actions from various rating agencies, including the impact of recent downgrades of our servicer ratings; volatility in our stock price; the characteristics of our servicing portfolio, including prepayment speeds along with delinquency and advance rates; our ability to contain and reduce our operating costs; our ability to successfully modify delinquent loans, manage foreclosures and sell foreclosed properties; uncertainty related to legislation, regulations, regulatory agency actions, government programs and policies, industry initiatives and evolving best servicing practices; as well as other risks detailed in Ocwen’s reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including its annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 (filed with the SEC on 08/18/14) and its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (filed with the SEC on 10/31/14). Anyone wishing to understand Ocwen’s business should review its SEC filings. Ocwen’s forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and, except for our ongoing obligations under the U.S. federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Investors: Stephen Swett T: (203) 614-0141 E: Media: Sard Verbinnen & Co Margaret Popper/David Millar T: 212-687-8080

– See more at: http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/03/02/711593/10122803/en/Ocwen-Financial-Corporation-Provides-Significant-Updates.html#sthash.LWDjP3Ku.xB2iZil9.dpuf

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

FHFA Enhances Requirements for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Sales of Non-Performing Loans

FHFA Enhances Requirements for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Sales of Non-Performing Loans

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
3/2/2015

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) today announced enhanced requirements for sales of non-performing loans (NPLs) by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (the Enterprises).  FHFA approved NPL sales by the Enterprises to reduce the number of severely delinquent loans held in their inventories and to transfer risk to the private sector.

“FHFA expects that with these enhanced requirements, NPL sales by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will result in more favorable outcomes for borrowers and local communities, while also reducing losses to the Enterprises and, therefore, to taxpayers,” said FHFA Director Melvin L. Watt.  “Under the requirements announced today, servicers must consider borrowers for a range of alternatives to foreclosure,” Watt said.

Enterprise NPL sales are generally expected to include loans that are severely delinquent, such as loans that are more than a year past due.  Under a pilot program, Freddie Mac sold severely delinquent loans through two transactions in the past six months – one in August 2014 covering $596 million of unpaid principal balance (UPB), and the other on February 5, 2015 covering $392 million of UPB.  FHFA’s enhanced requirements for future NPL sales are based, in part, on a review of these initial sales as well as other considerations.

The requirements announced today are expected to encourage broad participation by potential investors and provide for future publication of aggregate data about borrower outcomes.

Link to Related Fact Sheet

###

The Federal Housing Finance Agency regulates Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks. These government-sponsored enterprises provide more than $5.6 trillion in funding for the U.S. mortgage markets and financial institutions.

Contacts:

Corinne Russell (202) 649-3032 / Stefanie Johnson (202) 649-3030

source: FHFA.gov

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Advert

Archives