GLASKI v. BANK OF AMERICA || APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF ** RESPONDENTS’ BRIEF ** APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

GLASKI v. BANK OF AMERICA || APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF ** RESPONDENTS’ BRIEF ** APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF

Posted on26 August 2013.

GLASKI v. BANK OF AMERICA || APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF ** RESPONDENTS’ BRIEF ** APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THOMAS A. GLASKI,
Plaintiff and Appellant,

V,

BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO “LA SALLE BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR WAMU
MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005-AR-17″, CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
AND CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY,
Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from a Judgment of the
Superior Court for Fresno County

Hon. Alan M. Simpson, Judge
Case No. 09CECG03601

BOAs-Petition-for-Rehearing-filed-8-23-2013

Down Load PDF of This Case

Glaski-Appellants-Opening-Brief

Down Load PDF of This Case

Glaski-Appellants-Reply-Brief

Down Load PDF of This Case

Glaski-Respondents-Brief

Down Load PDF of This Case

See how many signatures and employers Deborah Brignac has below as first posted on 6/10/2011

[ipaper docId=57500518 access_key=key-24g66uu6crot12mqdfkb height=600 width=600 /]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. In the Matter of Merscorp, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Edward P. Romaine, & c., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS 2006 NY Int. 167 This...
  2. PUBLISHED! Glaski v. Bank of America CA5 (5th APPELLATE DISTRICT) | Securitization FAIL(ed) — NY Trust Law APPLIED — Quiet Title and a HOST of other “Causes” REVERSED and REMANDED — Homeowner UTTERLY DEFEATS JP Morgan H/T Timothy Y. Fong You guys did it! Thank you...
  3. Glaski v. Bank of America CA5 (5th APPELLATE DISTRICT) | Securitization FAIL(ed) — NY Trust Law APPLIED — Quiet Title and a HOST of other “Causes” REVERSED and REMANDED — Homeowner UTTERLY DEFEATS JP Morgan INTRODUCTION  Before Washington Mutual Bank, FA (WaMu) was seized by...
  4. Malagon v. CitiMortgage – Fla 3rd DCA “Concedes error on the trial court’s denial of appellants’ motion to vacate the final judgment of foreclosure” Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term,...
  5. Boye v. Citimortgage – Fla. 2nd DCA | “Failed to prove that it provided appellants with the requisite notice of default as required by the mortgage” NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND,...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11558 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


One Response to “GLASKI v. BANK OF AMERICA || APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF ** RESPONDENTS’ BRIEF ** APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Glaski v. Bank of America, N.A. | Petition for Rehearing DENIED . . . says:
    08/29/2013 at 5:38 pm

    […] GLASKI v. BANK OF AMERICA || APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF ** RESPONDENTS’ BRIEF ** APPELLANT’S RE… IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE… […]


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,916 spam blocked by Akismet