By looks of this, it appears to have to do with Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
From the order:
4. All mortgage foreclosure cases are hereby STAYED and shall remain so until further order of the Court. Any deadlines for filing on any issue are hereby suspended. Counsel are permitted to file Notice of Appearance.
[…]
9. The Court will hear argument on the standing issue in Plaintiff’s Objections to the Reports and Recommendations in Fryzel v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al. (C.A. No. 10-352-M) and Cosajay v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al. (C.A. No. 10-442-M) on September 13, 2011 at 10:a.m. in Courtroom 3. Any party subject to this order that is not a party to the aforementioned two cases wishing to file an amicus brief on the standing shall do so by September 2, 2011. Only counsel in the aforementioned two individual cases will be allowed to present oral argument.
SFF has posted numerous court orders involving this firm and nothing has come about the fraud they are submitting and swearing to under oath. Shocking.
Lets set aside that these are FORECLOSURES for a second…T h e s e a r e o f f i c e r s o f t h e c o u r t [PERIOD END OF STORY], intentionally submitting bogus, fraudulent documents even after they were made aware of new filing requirements.
“We cannot allow the courts in New York State to stand by idly and be party to what we now know is a deeply flawed process, especially when that process involves basic human needs–such as a family home–during this period of economic crisis,” said New York State Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman in a statement.
Judge Melvyn Tanenbaum suspends the following cases
Excerpt:
This Court has repeatedly directed plaintiffs counsel to submit proposed orders of reference
and judgments of foreclosure in proper form and counsel has continuously failed to do so. The Court
provided counsel’s office directly with copies of orders and judgments which would satisfy the
requirements and counsel has responded by submitting correspondence addressed to the Court from
non-attorney employees with improper and inadequate submissions. The Court deems plaintiffs
counsel’s actions to be an intentional failure to comply with the directions of the Court and a
dereliction of professional responsibility. Accordingly it is…
Continue to the Orders All The Way Down…
.
Another 18 reasons why an Investigation should be in order…some of us are keeping track and trust me there is many more!
Recent Comments