IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
CHARLES GILES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PHELAN, HALLINAN & SCHMIEG,
L.L.P., et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the motion for temporary
restraints and entry of a protective order by Defendants Phelan
Hallinan & Schmieg, P.C., Francis S. Hallinan, Rosemarie Diamond,
Full Spectrum Services, Inc., and Land Title Services of New
Jersey, Inc. (“Moving Defendants”) [Docket Item 5]; the Court
having received briefing in support of the motion by the Moving
Defendants on November 21, 2011 and in opposition to the motion
by Plaintiffs on November 28, 2011; the Court having heard oral
argument on the motion from the Parties at a hearing on November
28, 2011;
For the reasons articulated in the Oral Opinion read into
the record at the November 28, 2011 hearing; and for good cause
shown
IT IS, this 28th day of November, 2011, ORDERED that the motion for temporary restraints and entry
of a protective order shall be, and hereby is, DENIED without
prejudice.
s/ Jerome B. Simandle
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
U.S. District Judge
PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
[ipaper docId=76011464 access_key=key-1c3bwc8vfogyz8v37yur height=600 width=600 /]
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Recent Comments