UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
In re JOSHUA & STEPHANIE MITCHELL)
Case No. BK-S-07-16226-LBR ) Chapter 7 )
In Hawkins the motion was brought by MERS “solely as nominee for Fremont Investment
& Loan, its successors and/or assigns.” However, in his affidavit at ¶ 6, Victor Parisi states 45 46
that the beneficial ownership interest in the Hawkins note was sold by Fremont Investment &
Loan and ownership was transferred by endorsement and delivery. While the affidavit goes on to
the say that MERS was a holder at the time the motion was filed, it is obvious that MERS has no
rights to bring the motion as nominee of Fremont given that Fremont no longer had any interest
in the note.
[ipaper docId=40410866 access_key=key-22eoddwqf0r1xwydpksl height=600 width=600 /]© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.