Attorney Nick Wooten does it again and again!
LASALLE BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, et al
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
Following hearing and review of all submissions from the parties the Court has come to two conclusions necessary for the disposition of this case:
First, the Court is surprised to the point of astonishment that the defendant trust (LaSalle Bank National Association) did not comply with the terms of it’s own Pooling and Servicing Agreement and further did not comply with the New York Law in attempting to obtain assignment of plaintiff Horac’s note and mortgage.
Second, the plaintiff Horace is a third party beneficiary of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement created by the defendant trust (Lasalle Bank National Association). Indeed without such Pooling and Servicing Agreements, plaintiff Horace and other mortgages similarly situated would never have been able to obtain financing.
[ipaper docId=52101105 access_key=key-iej1nv2qejgqv46zf0p height=600 width=600 /]© 2010-15 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.