UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GUSTAVO REYES, ET AL., Plaintiffs,
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant
For the reasons stated above, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part
as follows: 1) the Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ claim for breach of contract/breach of the
implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which is dismissed for failure to state a claim.
Because the Court concludes that Plaintiffs cannot state a claim by amending their complaint, this
claim is dismissed without leave to amend; 2) the Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ claim for
restitution/rescission except as to Plaintiffs’ March payment, as to which Plaintiffs state a claim.
Otherwise, the claim is dismissed without leave to amend; 3) the Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs’
claim under the Rosenthal Act; and 4) the Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs’ unfair competition
claim under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 3, 2011
[ipaper docId=46601201 access_key=key-18r7livq9j20rvqfwc29 height=600 width=600 /]© 2010-15 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.