THE TRUSTEE OF A TRUST HOLDS THE ACTUAL RECORDS. THE HIDDEN TRANSFERS IS WHAT ALLOWS THESE PEOPLE TO DO ILLEGAL ACTS AND TRANSFERS.
[scribd id=31053678 key=key-2ecqhcxcs40ajpqq9xw9 mode=list]
Posted on 07 May 2010.
THE TRUSTEE OF A TRUST HOLDS THE ACTUAL RECORDS. THE HIDDEN TRANSFERS IS WHAT ALLOWS THESE PEOPLE TO DO ILLEGAL ACTS AND TRANSFERS.
[scribd id=31053678 key=key-2ecqhcxcs40ajpqq9xw9 mode=list]
Posted in case, foreclosure fraud, forensic mortgage investigation audit, MERS, mortgage electronic registration system, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., Mortgage Foreclosure FraudComments (0)
Posted on 05 May 2010.
Extra Special Delivery…via Brian W. Davies
[scribd id=30939283 key=key-24i05tjgw2t94w9n8nye mode=list]
Posted in foreclosure fraudComments (0)
Posted on 02 May 2010.
Via: b.daviesmd6605
Included here is a short excerpt that discusses the way MERS allows nearly any member have MERS authority to sign documents. The article says that some states require the signor to be a VP of the actual member. Eventually some states allow them to be an authorized signatory despite not being an employee. If any late assignments apply to you this is then a must read.
[ipaper docId=30807513 access_key=key-2jtfrih99eg7hyj51oi0 height=600 width=600 /]
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.Posted in Christopher Peterson, foreclosure fraud, MERS, mortgage electronic registration system, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., robo signer, robo signersComments (0)
Posted on 01 May 2010.
[ipaper docId=30774626 access_key=key-qfqhg7smvggxca73r9x height=600 width=600 /]
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Posted in case, forensic mortgage investigation audit, reversed court decisionComments (2)
Posted on 01 May 2010.
The Kansas appellate court noted that MERS received no funds and that the mortgage required the borrower to pay his monthly payments to the lender. just as in the case at hand, that the notice provisions of the mortgage “did not list MERS as an entity to contact upon default or foreclosure.” declaring that MERS did not have a “sort of substantial rights and interests” that had been found in a prior decision and noting that “a party with no beneficial interest is outside the realm of necessary parties,” the Kansas court concluded that “the failure to name and serve MERS as a defendant in a foreclosure action in which the lender of record has been served” was not such a fatal defect that the foreclosure judgment should be set aside. at 331, 192 P.3d at 181-82.
It is my opinion that the same holds true in the instant case. Here, Pulaski Mortgage, the lender for whom MERS served as nominee, was served in the foreclosure action. But, further, neither MERS’s holding of legal title, nor its status as nominee, demonstrates any interest that would have rendered it a necessary party pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 19(a).
For these reasons, I concur that the circuit court’s order should be affirmed.
IMBER and WILLS, JJ., join.
[ipaper docId=30774283 access_key=key-13lkiaigfhjiknf5bhf2 height=600 width=600 /]
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.Posted in case, foreclosure, foreclosure fraud, MERS, mortgage electronic registration systemComments (0)
Posted on 24 March 2010.
Here Mr. Davies points out some VERY IMPORTANT issues. This is NOT limited to OneWest/ IndyMac as we come to find out many of these “Non-Creditors” use almost the same verbiage over and over and over.
Take time to read this over because what you sign TODAY may not help you Tomorrow if you sign your rights away! Do NOT sign anything you do not understand and consult with an attorney ASAP. Mr. Davies is one highly intelligent man! Thank you for your fine work!
[scribd id=26821737 key=key-1fp04vkaavyupru2goxf mode=list]
Posted in foreclosure fraudComments (0)
Recent Comments