2019-17-7 by DinSFLA on Scribd
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Comments
Related posts:
- US Bank Trust, N.A. v. Schranz | Hawaii ICA – Genuine issue of material of fact as to TMLF Hawaii LLLC received the original Note & BOA entitled to enforce it prior to the commencement of this action H/T to Dubin Law Offices for this win! 035152614 by...
- NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, vs. DANIEL KALEOALOHA KANAHELE and THE ESTATE OF MARCUS C. KANAHELE et al., | HAWII ICA – In conclusion, if Nationstar can prove on remand that it possessed the Note with three indorsements prior to filing its Complaint, it will establish its standing to enforce the Note under Reyes-Toledo. However, Nationstar conceded its status as “holder” H/T DUBIN LAW OFFICES SCWC-16-0000319 by DinSFLA on Scribd ©...
- PennyMac Corp. v. Travis | Hawaii ICA – There is a genuine issue of fact as to when Chase was entitled to enforce the Note, and thus had standing at the time the Complaint was filed Great Job Gary Dubin Law Offices! CAAP-16-0000806sdo by DinSFLA on...
- Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Riopta | Hawaii ICA – The evidence in this case fails to demonstrate that the original plaintiff, Citimortgage, was entitled to enforce the Note when this action was commenced. VACATED Dubin Law Offices are on a roll! 035010218 by DinSFLA...
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Taggart | PA SC – Accordingly, we conclude that Subsection 403(c) requires the lender to provide a second pre-foreclosure notice prior to initiating a second mortgage foreclosure action. Our holding best serves the remedial purposes of Act 6, reflecting the expressed legislative intent to impose a robust notice requirement prior to initiation of any mortgage foreclosure action, without exception. Great Ajax’s predecessor, JP Morgan, was required to deliver a new Act 6 notice prior to initiating the second foreclosure action. 2019-6-eap-2018 by DinSFLA on Scribd © 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD |...