Edmondson v. Eagle National Bank | 4th Cir. Court - certain lenders participated in "kickback schemes" prohibited by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"), 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. ... We, however, hold that, under the allegations set forth in their complaints, Plaintiffs are entitled to relief from the limitations period under the fraudulent concealment tolling doctrine.

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Edmondson v. Eagle National Bank | 4th Cir. Court – certain lenders participated in “kickback schemes” prohibited by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. … We, however, hold that, under the allegations set forth in their complaints, Plaintiffs are entitled to relief from the limitations period under the fraudulent concealment tolling doctrine.

Edmondson v. Eagle National Bank | 4th Cir. Court – certain lenders participated in “kickback schemes” prohibited by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. …  We, however, hold that, under the allegations set forth in their complaints, Plaintiffs are entitled to relief from the limitations period under the fraudulent concealment tolling doctrine.

H/T DUBIN LAW OFFICES

Buckley InfoBytes – Edmonson, Et Al v. Eagle National Bank – 4th Circuit Opinion 2019.04.26 by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 9272 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives