Edmondson v. Eagle National Bank | 4th Cir. Court – certain lenders participated in “kickback schemes” prohibited by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. … We, however, hold that, under the allegations set forth in their complaints, Plaintiffs are entitled to relief from the limitations period under the fraudulent concealment tolling doctrine. - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Edmondson v. Eagle National Bank | 4th Cir. Court – certain lenders participated in “kickback schemes” prohibited by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. … We, however, hold that, under the allegations set forth in their complaints, Plaintiffs are entitled to relief from the limitations period under the fraudulent concealment tolling doctrine.

Edmondson v. Eagle National Bank | 4th Cir. Court – certain lenders participated in “kickback schemes” prohibited by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. …  We, however, hold that, under the allegations set forth in their complaints, Plaintiffs are entitled to relief from the limitations period under the fraudulent concealment tolling doctrine.

H/T DUBIN LAW OFFICES

Buckley InfoBytes – Edmonson, Et Al v. Eagle National Bank – 4th Circuit Opinion 2019.04.26 by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11543 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives