sc17-1387 by on Scribd
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Comments
Related posts:
- Tagupa v. VIPDESK, Haw: Supreme Court 2015 | the authority of a trial court to condition the voluntary dismissal of a complaint upon the plaintiff’s payment of the defendant’s attorney’s fees and costs. via a reader This is actually a very important decision....
- MIHALYI v. LASALLE BANK, NA, Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 4th Dist.| The record reveals Mihayli is entitled to prevailing party attorney’s fees and to an evidentiary hearing on the reasonableness of the amount of fees ADRIANNA MIHALYI, Appellant, v. LASALLE BANK, N.A., Appellee. No....
- Radosevich v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON | FL 3DCA- We reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct a further hearing, as may be appropriate, to determine whether Radosevich remains entitled to an award of attorney’s fees as the prevailing party Katherine Radosevich, Appellant, v. The Bank of New York...
- Nolan v. MIA REAL HOLDINGS, LLC | FL 4DCA – For the purpose of rule 1.420(a)(1), we hold that the two noteholders—the original plaintiff and the subsequent assignee of the note—were the same “plaintiff” under the rule, so that the second voluntary dismissal triggered an “adjudication on the merits.” CHARLES G. NOLAN, Appellant, v. MIA REAL HOLDINGS, LLC,...
- Kelly a/k/a Brian K. Kelly v. BankUnited | FL 4DCA – Appellant is the prevailing party below for purposes of entitlement to attorneys’ fees under section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH...