Schultz v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., (3d Cir. 2018) | CLASS ACTION – Misleading, Deceptive & False statement in a debt collection letter to the effect that forgiveness of the debt may be reported to the Internal Revenue Service constitutes a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §1692 et. seq. - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Schultz v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., (3d Cir. 2018) | CLASS ACTION – Misleading, Deceptive & False statement in a debt collection letter to the effect that forgiveness of the debt may be reported to the Internal Revenue Service constitutes a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §1692 et. seq.

Schultz v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., (3d Cir. 2018) |  CLASS ACTION –  Misleading, Deceptive & False statement in a debt collection letter to the effect that forgiveness of the debt may be reported to the Internal Revenue Service constitutes a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §1692 et. seq.

17-2244-2018-09-24 by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11546 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives