Related posts:

1. US Bank National Association v. Swink | HAWAII ICA – There is no admissible evidence establishing that US Bank was in possession of the blank endorsed Note at the time the complaint was filed. VACATED & REMANDED! H/T Dubin Law Offices 034978438 by DinSFLA on Scribd ©...
2. U.S. Bank National Association v. Kotak | Hawaii ICA – We conclude that U.S. Bank did not satisfy it’s burden to produce admissible evidence demonstrating that it was entitled to enforce the Note at time of this action was commenced. VACATED Dubin Law Offices has been whipping butt!! 035045982 by DinSFLA...
3. HSBC Bank USA v. Bartolome | Hawaii ICA – Another Victory for Dubin Law Offices – We conclude that HSBC did not satisfy it’s burden to produce admissible evidence demonstrating that it was entitled to enforce the Note at time of this action was commenced. VACATED 035118463 by DinSFLA on Scribd © 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD |...
4. McNair v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC | FL 5DCA – (1) it failed to authenticate the loan payment history; (2) it failed to lay the foundation for admission of its business records and those of its predecessor; and (3) there was no competent, substantial evidence regarding the amount of interest that Appellant owed on the loan   WILLIAM O. MCNAIR, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, ET...
5. NYSC FINDS BNY FAILED TO SUBMIT ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE: Bank of New York v. Elserafy 2010 SUPREME COURT – STATE OF NEW YORK Present: HON. F....