Dubin Law Does it Again!!
035157745 by DinSFLA on Scribd
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Comments
Related posts:
- US Bank National Association v. Swink | HAWAII ICA – There is no admissible evidence establishing that US Bank was in possession of the blank endorsed Note at the time the complaint was filed. VACATED & REMANDED! H/T Dubin Law Offices 034978438 by DinSFLA on Scribd ©...
- MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Brennan | Hawaii ICA – MTGLQ concedes that there is no evidence of record of the original plaintiff (BOA’s) standing as holder of the original Promissory Note when the complaint for foreclosure was filed…. VACATED h/t Dubin Law Offices 034935589 by DinSFLA on Scribd ©...
- FANNIE MAE v AMARAL | HAWAII ICA – Here OneWest did not attach the Note to its Complaint and the Declariation fails to establish, or even mention that OneWest possessed the Note at time it filed its Complaint … Order & Judgment VACATED! Congratulations to DUBIN LAW OFFICES 034924951 (1) by DinSFLA on...
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Behrendt | HAWAII SC – Wells Fargo submitted no properly admitted evidence demonstrating that it was entitled to enforce the Note at the time the complaint was filed Congrats to DUBIN LAW OFFICES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF...
- Angelini v. HSBC USA, N.A. | FL 4DCA – Bank here failed to introduce evidence that it held (through the possession of the blank-indorsed paper) the note, as opposed to merely owned the note, when the foreclosure complaint was filed. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH...
Not a win, just a stall.