034935589 by DinSFLA on Scribd
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Comments
Related posts:
- FANNIE MAE v AMARAL | HAWAII ICA – Here OneWest did not attach the Note to its Complaint and the Declariation fails to establish, or even mention that OneWest possessed the Note at time it filed its Complaint … Order & Judgment VACATED! Congratulations to DUBIN LAW OFFICES 034924951 (1) by DinSFLA on...
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Behrendt | HAWAII SC – Wells Fargo submitted no properly admitted evidence demonstrating that it was entitled to enforce the Note at the time the complaint was filed Congrats to DUBIN LAW OFFICES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF...
- US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. Lopez, 2017 IL App (2d) | As assignment of debt to Plaintiff must have occurred after foreclosure complaint was filed, assignment of mortgage did not give Plaintiff the rights of a holder, and Plaintiff lacked standing at the time complaint was filed. 2017 IL App (2d) 160967 U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,...
- JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Rundgren | Hawaii ICA – VACATED! genuine material fact as to whether JP Morgan Chase was entitled to enforce the subject Note at the time this foreclosure action was commenced Via DUBIN LAW OFFICES 034937431 by DinSFLA on Scribd ©...
- Seidler v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA | FL 1stDCA – Because the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support reestablishment of the lost page of the note or to prove the original plaintiff’s standing to enforce the note at the time the foreclosure action was filed JASON P. SEIDLER and MELISSA C. SEIDLER, Appellants, v. WELLS...