USA ex rel. PETER D. GRUBEA, v. ROSICKI, ROSICKI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al., | Rosicki's argue FNMA knew about the marked up expenses and did not care. Bank of America argues it does not matter and this pleading by the Govt discloses many of the shenanigans taking place between Fannie Mae and loan servicers (notably Bank of America)

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

USA ex rel. PETER D. GRUBEA, v. ROSICKI, ROSICKI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al., | Rosicki’s argue FNMA knew about the marked up expenses and did not care. Bank of America argues it does not matter and this pleading by the Govt discloses many of the shenanigans taking place between Fannie Mae and loan servicers (notably Bank of America)

USA ex rel. PETER D. GRUBEA, v. ROSICKI, ROSICKI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al., |  Rosicki’s argue FNMA knew about the marked up expenses and did not care.  Bank of America argues it does not matter and this pleading by the Govt discloses many of the shenanigans taking place between Fannie Mae and loan servicers (notably Bank of America)

Rosicki Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (1) by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8947 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives