CAAP-16-0000584sdo by DinSFLA on Scribd
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
Comments
Related posts:
- Carty v. Bank of America, NA | FL 4DCA – a genuine issue of material fact was created by the two different versions of the note filed by the appellee bank GASTON CARTY and MARLENE J. CARTY, Appellants, v. BANK OF...
- Taylor v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC | FL 2DCA “Genuine issues of material fact remain regarding the Taylors’ affirmative defense of lack of notice” JOYCE TAYLOR and LANKFORD TAYLOR, Appellants, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING,...
- Russell v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP | FL 4DCA- a genuine issue of material fact existed as to standing at the inception of the action because the endorsement on the note attached to the complaint was different than the endorsements on the original note filed with the court. LESLINE RUSSELL, Appellant, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP...
- ABUBO vs THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON | DC of Hawaii – Oder Denying MSJ, Genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether Countrywide complied with TILA via: Gary Dubin IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR...
- Amstone v. The Bank of New York Mellon | Therefore, genuine issues of material fact remained, summary judgment should not have been entered, and we must reverse for further proceedings. …. We conclude that the Bank did prove standing but failed to refute the Amstones’ affirmative defenses Amstone v. The Bank of New York Mellon (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016) View...