Related posts:

1. Deutsche Bank v Idarecis | NY Appeals Court – the affidavit failed to establish that the plaintiff had physical possession of the note prior to commencing the action Decided on November 18, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE...
2. U.S. Bank N.A. v Friedman | NYSC – Plaintiff having failed to establish that it owned the Note on the date this case was commenced, it does not have standing to maintain this action SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF...
3. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Gilbert | NY Appeals Court – plaintiff failed to demonstrate its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, because it did not eliminate triable issues of fact regarding whether it had standing as the lawful holder or assignee of the subject note on the date it commenced the action Decided on August 27, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE...
4. Septimus v. CHRISTIANA TRUST, Fla: 4DCA | The bank, a successor plaintiff, failed to demonstrate that its predecessor had standing at the time the action was commenced   MARIE A. SEPTIMUS and VILNOR SEPTIMUS, Appellants, v. CHRISTIANA...
5. Bank of America v Yeh | HAWAII ICA – BANA did not present evidence to establish its entitlement to enforce the Note at the time the action commenced. H/T DUBIN LAW OFFICES 028866654 (1) by DinSFLA on Scribd...