November, 2017 - FORECLOSURE FRAUD - Page 2

Archive | November, 2017

Hurricanes could bring another disaster: Foreclosures

Hurricanes could bring another disaster: Foreclosures

CNN-

As life slowly returns to normal in hurricane-ravaged parts of Texas, Florida and Puerto Rico, housing experts and consumer advocates worry another crisis is on the horizon: Foreclosures.

Already, legal aid groups are working with people who are struggling to make mortgage payments on homes made uninhabitable by the storms, while paying rent somewhere else.

Although most mortgage lenders are offering grace periods for homeowners in disaster zones, the real trouble begins when those grace periods run out.

[CNN]

image: NBC NEWS

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

TFH 11/12 | Veterans Day Special: What Every Homeowner Needs To Know To Emotionally Survive Foreclosure

TFH 11/12 | Veterans Day Special: What Every Homeowner Needs To Know To Emotionally Survive Foreclosure

COMING TO YOU LIVE DIRECTLY FROM THE DUBIN LAW OFFICES AT HARBOR COURT, DOWNTOWN HONOLULU, HAWAII

LISTEN TO KHVH-AM (830 ON THE AM RADIO DIAL)

ALSO AVAILABLE ON KHVH-AM ON THE iHEART APP ON THE INTERNET

.

.

Sunday – November 12

 ———————
Veterans Day Special: What Every Homeowner Needs To Know To Emotionally Survive Foreclosure

 

 

 

In discussing foreclosures and the numerical proliferation of pretender lenders and robo-signers, for example, we too often tend to forget the individuals and family members who are the victims of mortgage abuse behind the aggregate numbers, who are the veterans too often also of courtroom abuse, and their emotional ordeal and personal needs beyond financial losses alone.

It therefore seems fitting this Veterans Day Weekend to go behind the statistics and to examine some of the terrible harm inflicted on homeowners, the veterans as it were of foreclosures, such as divorce, suicide, crime, drug and alcohol abuse, child endangerment, homelessness, physical illness, and mental depression.

We will also consider whether such disturbing byproducts of the present foreclosure system are worth it to society when other more sensible and humane ways of handling mortgage defaults exist.

And finally we will suggest realistic ways of coping with, as well as avoiding, some of the worse aspects of such threats to personal health and safety and to the social order.

Your co-host, John Waihee, former Hawaii Governor, and I are therefore pleased to rebroadcast this Veterans Day Weekend, especially for our many new listeners, our May 17, 2015 Radio Program “What Every Homeowner Needs To Know To Emotionally Survive Foreclosure”.

Please go to our website, www.foreclosurehour.com, and join your fellow homeowners in the Homeowners SuperPac today.

A Membership Application is posted there waiting for your support.

 

 

.
Host: Gary Dubin Co-Host: John Waihee

.

CALL IN AT (808) 521-8383 OR TOLL FREE (888) 565-8383

Have your questions answered on the air.

Submit questions to info@foreclosurehour.com

The Foreclosure Hour is a public service of the Dubin Law Offices

Past Broadcasts

EVERY SUNDAY
3:00 PM HAWAII 
5:00 PM PACIFIC
8:00 PM EASTERN
ON KHVH-AM
(830 ON THE DIAL)
AND ON
iHEART RADIO

The Foreclosure Hour 12

 

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Justice Department Sues Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. in Bellevue, Washington, for Illegally Foreclosing on Homes of at Least 28 Servicemembers

Justice Department Sues Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. in Bellevue, Washington, for Illegally Foreclosing on Homes of at Least 28 Servicemembers

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, November 9, 2017

Justice Department Sues Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. in Bellevue, Washington, for Illegally Foreclosing on Homes of at Least 28 Servicemembers

The U.S. Department of Justice today filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, alleging that Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. (Northwest) violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA).  The complaint alleges that since 2010, Northwest completed foreclosures on at least 28 homes owned by servicemembers without obtaining the required court orders.

The SCRA protects the rights of servicemembers on active duty by suspending or modifying certain civil obligations.  The law prohibits foreclosing on the home of a servicemember during active military service and one year thereafter without a court order if the mortgage originated prior to the servicemember’s period of military service.

The department launched an investigation into Northwest’s practices after United States Marine veteran Jacob McGreevey of Vancouver, Washington, submitted a complaint to the department’s Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative in May 2016.  Northwest had foreclosed on McGreevey’s home in August 2010, less than two months after he was released from active duty in Operation Iraqi Freedom.  McGreevey sued both PHH Mortgage (his mortgage servicer) and Northwest in 2016, but a U.S. District Court Judge accepted PHH and Northwest’s argument that McGreevy had waited too long to file his case, and dismissed the case on that basis.  The department’s investigation revealed that, in addition to McGreevey, NWTS had foreclosed on other homes of SCRA-protected servicemembers in violation of the SCRA since 2010.

“As we reflect this Veterans Day on the great debt we owe to those who have fought so hard for our freedom, we also reaffirm our commitment to protecting the rights of those who serve,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General John M. Gore of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.  “Our men and women in uniform make immense personal sacrifices to keep our country safe.  Losing their home to an unlawful foreclosure should not be one of them.”

“The loss of a home is a devastating blow for anyone – but far worse for active duty service members often called to war zones far from Western Washington,” said U.S. Attorney Annette L. Hayes. “Our investigation revealed that Northwest Trustee Services repeatedly failed to comply with laws that are meant to ensure our service members do not have to fight a two front war – one on behalf of all of us, and the other against illegal foreclosures.  My office will continue to work closely with our colleagues in the Civil Rights Division in Washington, D.C. to protect Western Washington service members from this kind of misconduct.”

In addition to monetary damages for affected servicemembers, the SCRA provides for civil monetary penalties of up to $60,788 for the first offense and $121,577 for each subsequent offense.  The department will also seek injunctive relief to prevent future foreclosures that violate the SCRA.

Northwest Trustee Services is based in Bellevue, Washington, and describes itself as a full-service trustee company providing foreclosure services to mortgage lenders in the Western United States.  The complaint is an allegation of unlawful conduct.  The allegations must still be proven in federal court.

This case is being jointly handled by the department’s Civil Rights Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Washington.

The department’s enforcement of the SCRA is conducted by the Civil Rights Division’s Housing and Civil Enforcement Section, often in partnership with local United States Attorney’s Offices.  Since 2011, the department has obtained over $450 million in monetary relief for servicemembers through its enforcement of the SCRA.  The SCRA provides protections for servicemembers in areas such as evictions, rental agreements, security deposits, prepaid rent, civil judicial proceedings, installment contracts, credit card interest rates, mortgage interest rates, mortgage foreclosures, automobile leases, life insurance, health insurance and income tax payments.  For more information about the department’s SCRA enforcement, please visit www.servicemembers.gov.

Servicemembers and their dependents who believe that their rights under the SCRA have been violated should contact the nearest Armed Forces Legal Assistance Program Office.  Office locations may be found at http://legalassistance.law.af.mil/content/locator.php.

Topic(s):
Servicemembers Initiative
Component(s):
Press Release Number:
17-1273
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Judge: ‘I’ve never seen such horrible treatment’ of a homeowner

Judge: ‘I’ve never seen such horrible treatment’ of a homeowner

TBO-

As head of civil processing for the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office, Sgt. Tim Grundmann supervised employees who serve subpoenas, eviction notices and notices of foreclosure.

Thus it was embarrassing to Grundmann when a clerk told him:

“You’re being sued. You’re being foreclosed on.”

That was in 2013, when the Tampa Bay area was still reeling from the housing crash and 70,000 homeowners in Pinellas alone had been hit with foreclosure notices. The overwhelming majority of those had not been paying their mortgages and were living in their houses rent free.

[TBO]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

California Court Holds That HELOCS Are Not Negotiable Instruments Under the UCC

California Court Holds That HELOCS Are Not Negotiable Instruments Under the UCC

H/T Reader of this Site –

“Financial institutions securitized billions in Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOC). These same institutions argue in courts across the country that HELOCs are negotiable instruments under the Uniform Commercial Code, and therefore, the banks do not have to prove ownership of the debt, rather merely possession; “Even if we stole the HELOC, we have the right to enforce it under the Uniform Commercial Code, because we have possession of the original instrument.” A California Court disagreed, and in considering a borrower’s motion for summary adjudication, held that HELOCs are not payable for a fixed sum and are therefore not negotiable instruments; a ruling that helps pave the way to force banks to prove ownership of billions of dollars in HELOCs under contract law.

“The HELOC Is Not a Negotiable Instrument

Section 104.3104 of Nevada’s Uniform Commercial Code provides that, among other things, “‘negotiable instrument’ means an unconditional promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money.” Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 104.3104(1). Neither of the parties has cited to any Nevada authorities dealing with the issue of whether a note evidencing a line of credit qualifies as a Courts applying other states’ versions of UCC § 3-104 have held that lines of credit or revolving loans are not negotiable instruments as they fail the “fixed amount” requirement. Am First Fed. v. Gordon, 2015 WL 3798210 (Conn. Super. Ct. May 26, 2015); Heritage Bank v.Bruha, 812 N.W.2d 260 (2012); Yin v. Society Nat’l Bank Ind., 665 N.E.2d 58 (1996); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Oaks Apts. Joint Venture, 966 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1992); Cadle Co. v. Richardson, 597 So. 2d 1052 (1992). Under the terms of the HELOC, the obligee promises to lend Baroni money “from time to time” upon her request, up to a credit limit of $134,998.00, and Baroni promises to pay “when and as due, all loans made under this Agreement” pursuant to periodic monthly statements. The HELOC, however, does not state “a fixed amount of money” that Baroni is required to pay and the revolving nature of the agreement demonstrates Baroni would owe different amounts at different points in time depending upon her requests for loans and payments on account of those loans. Therefore, the HELOC does not qualify as a negotiable instrument within the meaning of section 104.3104.2 Because the HELOC is not a negotiable instrument, section 104.3205 does not apply to the HELOC. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.3205.”

MSJ Motion by DinSFLA on Scribd

Order Granting in Part Denying in Part Msj by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD2 Comments

More Wells Fargo workers allege retaliation for whistleblowing

More Wells Fargo workers allege retaliation for whistleblowing

CNN-

More former Wells Fargo employees allege they were fired after they tried to blow the whistle on shady activity at the bank.

That’s according to a new filing by Wells Fargo (WFC), which disclosed claims of “retaliation” by ex-employees.

Wells Fargo has been at the center of a number of scandals over the past year. This filing addresses two in particular — when the bank forced thousands of customers into car insurance they didn’t need, and when it wrongly charged homebuyers to lock in mortgage rates.

[CNN]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Trump’s commerce secretary Wilbur Ross has been lying about being a billionaire for years: report

Trump’s commerce secretary Wilbur Ross has been lying about being a billionaire for years: report

Raw Story-

Forbes says that it first started having suspicions about Ross’s net worth after it examined the financial-disclosure forms he filed after being nominated by Trump to lead the Department of Commerce. In all, the forms showed he had assets with a net worth of just $700 million, which was far below the $3.7 billion he had claimed to be worth, and below the $2.9 billion that Forbes had believed he was worth.

Ross initially told Forbes that he had shifted $2 billion into family trusts prior to being nominated for commerce secretary by Trump, which meant that he did not have to disclose it.

However, Forbes investigated the matter further and concluded that the $2 billion “never existed.”

[RAW STORY]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Wells Fargo faces lawsuits over mortgage and auto loans

Wells Fargo faces lawsuits over mortgage and auto loans

Reuters-

Wells Fargo & Co is facing litigation over previously disclosed sales problems related to its auto lending and mortgage businesses, the bank disclosed in a regulatory filing on Friday.

The lawsuits include two class action cases alleging violations of federal and state consumer fraud laws, as well as claims brought by former employees who said they were fired for raising concerns over problematic sales practices. Wells Fargo disclosed the litigation in its third-quarter financial filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“The disclosures included in our filing today reflect the company’s continued commitment to transparency. Our top priority is to rebuild trust, and we remain focused on making things right for our customers, team members, community partners and shareholders,” a company spokesman wrote via email.

The third-largest U.S. lender has spent more than a year trying to rebuild its reputation following a sales scandal that led to the departure of its CEO and a companywide overhaul of its business practices. The company says it is continuing to review all its businesses to root out bad practices.

[REUTERS]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

In a Mortgage-Crisis Settlement, Did a Bank Get Off Easy?

In a Mortgage-Crisis Settlement, Did a Bank Get Off Easy?

NYT-

In January, prosecutors concluded one of the last multibillion-dollar settlements related to the 2008 mortgage collapse. The deal, with Credit Suisse, required the bank to pay $2.48 billion to settle allegations that its securities unit had misled buyers of home-loan bundles it had sold between 2005 and 2007.

Credit Suisse also agreed to provide $2.8 billion worth of financial relief to troubled borrowers under the settlement by forgiving or modifying mortgages and helping to finance affordable housing projects across the country.

When they announced the $5.28 billion deal, prosecutors cited it as evidence that the United States government can and will ride herd on large financial institutions if they engage in misconduct.

“Today’s settlement underscores that the Department of Justice will hold accountable the institutions responsible for the financial crisis of 2008,” said Loretta E. Lynch, the attorney general at the time.

[NEW YORK TIMES]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Booting Detroit residents out of foreclosed homes must end

Booting Detroit residents out of foreclosed homes must end

Detroit Free Press-

Aside from shutting off water to Detroit residents, no public policy draws so much criticism as the annual Wayne County auction of tax-foreclosed properties.

For good reason, too. In recent years, thousands of owner-occupied Detroit homes have been seized by the Wayne County Treasurer’s office for non-payment of property taxes.

When the county puts these houses out to auction, it threatens to boot residents out of their homes. Often the houses wind up in the hands of absentee landlords, and the displaced residents wind up in shabbier housing elsewhere.

[DETROIT FREE PRESS]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Paradise Papers | Leaked Documents Show Foreclosure Kingpin Wilbur Ross Concealed Ties to Putin Cronies

Paradise Papers | Leaked Documents Show Foreclosure Kingpin Wilbur Ross Concealed Ties to Putin Cronies

NBC-

Wilbur Ross, the commerce secretary in the Trump administration, shares business interests with Vladimir Putin’s immediate family, and he failed to clearly disclose those interests when he was being confirmed for his cabinet position.

Ross — a billionaire industrialist — retains an interest in a shipping company, Navigator Holdings, that was partially owned by his former investment company. One of Navigator’s most important business relationships is with a Russian energy firm controlled, in turn, by Putin’s son-in-law and other members of the Russian president’s inner circle.

Some of the details of Ross’s continuing financial holdings — much of which were not disclosed during his confirmation process — are revealed in a trove of more than 7 million internal documents of Appleby, a Bermuda-based law firm, that was leaked to the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. The documents consist of emails, presentations and other electronic data. These were then shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists— a global network that won the Pulitzer Prize this year for its work on the Panama Papers — and its international media partners. NBC News was given access to some of the leaked documents, which the ICIJ calls the “Paradise Papers.”

[NBC]

image: CBS News

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

TFH 11/5 | “Foreclosure Terrorists” Are at Least Equally Dangerous: A Rebroadcast of Gary Dubin’s “Exclusive Tell-All Interview With Retired Big Five Bank Executive”

TFH 11/5 | “Foreclosure Terrorists” Are at Least Equally Dangerous: A Rebroadcast of Gary Dubin’s “Exclusive Tell-All Interview With Retired Big Five Bank Executive”

COMING TO YOU LIVE DIRECTLY FROM THE DUBIN LAW OFFICES AT HARBOR COURT, DOWNTOWN HONOLULU, HAWAII

LISTEN TO KHVH-AM (830 ON THE AM RADIO DIAL)

ALSO AVAILABLE ON KHVH-AM ON THE iHEART APP ON THE INTERNET

.

.

Sunday – November 5

 ———————
“Foreclosure Terrorists” Are at Least Equally Dangerous: A Rebroadcast of Gary Dubin’s “Exclusive Tell-All Interview With Retired Big Five Bank Executive”

 

 

Media headlines and press reports continue to be filled with references to terrorist threats and terrorist attacks taking place periodically throughout the United States, disrupting the lives of thousands while causing hundreds of deaths annually.

Drawing relatively little similar attention in the media, however, is the enormous amount of financial, emotional, and social disruption and emotional grief resulting in the United States from more than 15 million American families being foreclosed on thus far (with another 15 million foreclosures expected) and the number of foreclosure-related deaths multiplying, including suicides, occurring in the United States since 2008.

And yet, without in any way downplaying the seriousness of conventional terrorism as an immediate local and global threat, compare the numbers.

In reality more Americans have suffered more financial loss and even more deaths (by suicide or otherwise) than the total amount of financial losses and deaths caused by foreclosure terrorists in the United States, even including 9/11.

It seems appropriate, therefore, to rebroadcast our exclusive interview with a Big Five Bank Executive, originally aired on December 21, 2014, especially for our many new listeners since then, asking the question are “foreclosure terrorists” equally dangerous or perhaps in effect worse?

There is at least one difference: Conventional terrorists often wear explosive vests, whereas foreclosure terrorists are more difficult to identify, usually dressed in business suits with the Wall Street Journal tucked under their arms, making their way to their offices at the Treasury Department.

Yet the media coverage and expose of foreclosure terrorists is incredibly scarce, perhaps because in place of conventional terrorist weaponry, their often obscured weapons are photoshopped promissory notes, false endorsements, perjured mortgage assignments, and robo-signing perjurers, before which myopic judges genuflect.

And these foreclosure terrorists will continue to win in court until homeowners band together and unite state by state. The foreclosure terrorists can be defeated, but only if we unite.

Please go to our website, www.foreclosurehour.com, and join your fellow homeowners in the Homeowners SuperPac today.

A Membership Application is posted there waiting for your support.

This Sunday, Daylight Savings Time ends. The Foreclosure Hour will therefore be heard one hour earlier on Sundays on the U.S. Mainland (5:00 p.m. Pacific Time and 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time). In Hawaii there is no time change.

Additionally, our broadcasts now immediately repeat the following hour locally on KHVH AM Radio and on the iHeart Internet Radio.

However, locally in Hawaii only this Sunday’s show will be aired on KHVH AM at 2:00 p.m. instead of 3:00 p.m. due to the start of the Raiders football game being aired this Sunday starting in our regular time slot.

This local time change is for this Sunday only; however, it will not affect the time of the iHeart Internet Radio airing of this Sunday’s show nationally.
Listen to today’s show, posted on our website at www.foreclosurehour.com, and find out how you can change American history, beat the banks, by joining the Homeowners SuperPAC today.

.
Host: Gary Dubin Co-Host: John Waihee

.

CALL IN AT (808) 521-8383 OR TOLL FREE (888) 565-8383

Have your questions answered on the air.

Submit questions to info@foreclosurehour.com

The Foreclosure Hour is a public service of the Dubin Law Offices

Past Broadcasts

EVERY SUNDAY
3:00 PM HAWAII (2:00 p.m. instead of 3:00 p.m. due to the start of the Raiders football game being aired this Sunday starting in our regular time slot.)
5:00 PM PACIFIC
8:00 PM EASTERN
ON KHVH-AM
(830 ON THE DIAL)
AND ON
iHEART RADIO

The Foreclosure Hour 12

 

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

Buckingham v. Bank of America, NA | FL 2DCA- We reverse because the bank failed to prove that it had standing to foreclose.

Buckingham v. Bank of America, NA | FL 2DCA- We reverse because the bank failed to prove that it had standing to foreclose.

NANCY LEE BUCKINGHAM, Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5424.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 25, 2017.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; James H. Seals, Senior Judge.

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellant.

W. Bard Brockman and Christian J. Bromley of Bryan Cave LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Following a bench trial, Bank of America, N.A., obtained a judgment foreclosing a mortgage on Nancy Lee Buckingham’s home. We reverse because the bank failed to prove that it had standing to foreclose.

The bank filed a complaint alleging that it was the holder of the note and mortgage in question and that Buckingham was in default because she had stopped making payments. The complaint was verified by Ocwen Loan Servicing, as servicer for the bank. In her answer, Buckingham raised the affirmative defense that the bank lacked standing to sue on the note.

The only witness at trial was Shelia King, a senior loan analyst with Ocwen. King testified that Ocwen was the subservicer for the loan, but Buckingham objected that there were no documents in evidence to support the assertion that Ocwen was the subservicer for this specific loan. King’s testimony was premised on a limited power of attorney that was admitted into evidence; it did not specifically reference the Buckingham loan. The power of attorney authorized Ocwen to act for the bank in regard to certain mortgage loans identified in a flow subservicing agreement. This included the power to file suit on the bank’s behalf. However, the bank did not introduce the agreement into evidence, and as pointed out by Buckingham both below and on appeal, there was no evidence that the Buckingham loan was included in the agreement.

Beyond that, the evidence did not prove the bank’s standing. A copy of Buckingham’s note, which was executed in favor of Mortgagease, Inc., was attached to the complaint. There was an allonge to the note that transferred it from Mortgagease to ABN AMRO Mortgage Group. In turn, the note contained a subsequent endorsement from ABN in favor of LaSalle Bank, N.A. Finally, there was a blank endorsement executed by Bank of America as “[s]uccessor by merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A.”

“It is well settled that a plaintiff seeking to foreclose on a mortgage loan must establish that it had standing to foreclose at the time it filed the complaint.” Rosa v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 191 So. 3d 987, 988 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). “A plaintiff alleging standing as a holder `must prove not only physical possession of the original note but also, if the plaintiff is not the named payee, possession of the original note endorsed in favor of the plaintiff or in blank (which makes it bearer paper).'” Id. (quoting Kiefert v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 153 So. 3d 351, 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)).

In the present case, the note did not contain an endorsement in favor of the plaintiff bank. Although the note was ultimately endorsed in blank by the bank as a successor by merger to LaSalle Bank, there was no evidence establishing the merger, let alone that the bank acquired all of LaSalle Bank’s assets. See Fiorito v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 174 So. 3d 519, 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“While Chase also could have established standing through its merger with WAMU, the [loan] officer’s testimony fell short of establishing that Chase acquired all of WAMU’s assets, including Appellant’s note and mortgage, by virtue of the merger.”); see also DiGiovanni v. Deutsch Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 42 Fla. L. Weekly D772, D774 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 5, 2017) (“Without any evidence to show that Bankers Trust had been renamed Deustche Bank, Deustche Bank failed to show that it had standing to foreclose.”). On the present record, the endorsement in blank by the bank appears to be an anomalous endorsement[1] and a nonentity.

The bank did not present competent, substantial evidence that it was the holder of the note at the time the complaint was filed. The bank also did not establish that Ocwen was acting as its agent with the power to file suit on its behalf in regard to the Buckingham loan where the agreement was not entered into evidence and the last valid endorsement to the note was in favor of LaSalle Bank. This is not a situation such as in Phan v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., ex rel. First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF11, 198 So. 3d 744, 747-49 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), which held that Deustche Bank had constructive possession of the note because its agent was holding the note endorsed in blank on its behalf.

We reverse the final judgment and remand for entry of a final order of involuntary dismissal of the action. Elsman v. HSBC Bank USA, 182 So. 3d 770, 772 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (reversing the foreclosure judgment and remanding for an entry of an order of involuntary dismissal where HSBC Bank failed to prove standing at trial).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

LaROSE, CJ., and SILBERMAN, J., Concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.

[1] “The term `anomalous indorsement’ means an indorsement made by a person who is not the holder of the instrument. An anomalous indorsement does not affect the manner in which the instrument may be negotiated.” § 673.2051(4), Fla. Stat. (2014).

 

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Sign Here to Impeach Donald Trump Now!!

Sign Here to Impeach Donald Trump Now!!

IMPEACH DONALD TRUMP

We are urging Congress to pass a resolution calling for the House Committee on the Judiciary to investigate whether sufficient grounds exist for the impeachment of Donald John Trump, President of the United States.

.

.

.

 

click image below NOW!

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Trump repeals consumer arbitration rule, wins banker praise

Trump repeals consumer arbitration rule, wins banker praise

THE HILL-

President Trump on Wednesday signed a repeal of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s rule on forced arbitration, winning praise from banking and business groups.

Trump approved the resolution to repeal the CFPB rule, meant to prevent banks and credit card companies from blocking customers from joining class-action lawsuits against them, in a private Oval Office signing.

The House passed a resolution to repeal the rule in July, which passed the Senate two weeks ago.

[THE HILL]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Keane v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., MERS | 1st Cir- motion to vacate the prior order dismissing his case is reversed, the order dismissing the case is vacated

Keane v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., MERS | 1st Cir- motion to vacate the prior order dismissing his case is reversed, the order dismissing the case is vacated

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 16-1045
JOHN A. KEANE,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
HSBC BANK USA, as trustee for ELLINGTON TRUST, SERIES 2007-2;
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Kayatta, Lipez, and Barron,
Circuit Judges.
Jamie Ranney, Jamie Ranney, P.C., on brief for appellant.
Elizabeth T. Timkovich and Phoebe Norton Coddington, Winston
& Strawn, LLP, on brief for appellees.
October 31, 2017

Page 2
– 2 –
KAYATTACircuit Judge. John Keane appeals from the
denial of his motion to vacate an order dismissing his lawsuit
against HSBC, Nationstar Mortgage, and Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems. We reverse.
I.
In December 2014, Keane sued defendants in state court
in Massachusetts, alleging a variety of state law violations in
connection with a foreclosure action against a property he owned
on Nantucket. Defendants removed the action to federal court in
the District of Massachusetts and moved to dismiss the case on
April 23, 2015. The district court entered an order setting a
motion hearing for June 3. At Keane’s request, the district court
extended Keane’s response deadline to May 26, and moved the hearing
date to June 17. On May 26, Keane again requested an extension;
the district court further extended his response deadline to June
8, and reset the motion hearing to July 22, but noted in the order
that extended the deadline that “THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER
EXTENSIONS ALLOWED.” Keane timely filed his response in opposition
to the motion on June 8. His counsel, however, failed to appear
at the July 22 motion hearing. The district court, sua sponte,
dismissed Keane’s suit for failure to prosecute.
One day after the district court entered its order
dismissing the case, Keane’s counsel filed a motion for relief

Page 3
– 3 –
from that order, citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and
claiming “mistake, inadvertence, carelessness or excusable
neglect.” Keane’s counsel explained that his failure to appear at
the scheduled hearing was not intentional, but was instead the
result of his neglect in failing to calendar the July 22 hearing
date. A solo practitioner with a heavy caseload, he attributed
his neglect to the fact that his only two office assistants had
both left on maternity leave in June. The district court denied
the motion without prejudice to its being refiled along with
further supporting materials. Keane refiled the motion with an
affidavit from his attorney confirming the statements in the
original motion, but the district court denied it without any
further explanation.1
Keane appealed this denial, and only this
denial; his notice of appeal does not mention the initial dismissal
of the case for failure to prosecute.
II.
We begin with a preliminary jurisdictional issue. In
theory (and as a matter of prudence) Keane might have appealed
from both the order dismissing the case for failure to prosecute
1 It appears that the renewed motion was actually filed one
day after the 30-day deadline set by the district court, because
the month in which that deadline was set was a month with 31 days.
Neither party has made anything of this, nor did the district court
cite this one day delay as a reason for denying the motion.

Page 4
– 4 –
and the order denying his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from that
order. Instead, in his notice of appeal he designated only the
latter, leaving us with jurisdiction only to review the latter.
See Nansamba v. N. Shore Med. Ctr., Inc., 727 F.3d 33, 37 (1st
Cir. 2013). In this context, though, the analyses of both the
underlying dismissal and the Rule 60(b) motion merge. When a
district court dismisses a case for failure to prosecute due to
non-attendance at a hearing, it often lacks a key piece of
information: the reason why the party or attorney failed to attend.
This information only becomes available when the dismissed party
requests relief from the dismissal under Rule 60(b). Thus, the
Rule 60(b) motion provides the first occasion upon which a party
may be heard and a fully informed district court can decide the
appropriate course of action. And while a dismissal without notice
and the opportunity to be heard would normally trigger due process
concerns, the ability of a party or attorney to present an excuse
for the absence on a Rule 60(b) motion solves this problem. See
Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 632 (1962)(“[T]he
availability of a corrective remedy such as is provided by Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . . . renders the lack of prior
notice of less consequence.”). In evaluating the district court’s
denial of Keane’s Rule 60(b) motion, we are essentially asking
whether, given the information placed before it, the dismissal

Page 5
– 5 –
remained justified as an act of the district court’s discretion,
or whether the district court was required to grant Keane’s
requested relief and vacate the dismissal. Thus, Keane’s appeal
of the refusal to set aside, under Rule 60(b), the dismissal
entered without notice permits us to consider the appropriateness
of that dismissal, even if listing both rulings in the notice of
appeal would have been preferable.
The grant or denial of a motion under Rule 60(b) is
committed to the sound discretion of the district court and we
review its decision for abuse of discretion. Dávila-Álvarez v.
Escuela de Medicina Universidad Central del Caribe, 257 F.3d 58,
63 (1st Cir. 2001); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842
F.3d 163, 169 (1st Cir. 2016) (“The trial judge has wide discretion
in this arena, and we will not meddle unless we are persuaded that
some exceptional justification exists.” (internal quotation marks
omitted)). In general, our precedent dictates that Rule 60(b)
motions should be granted sparingly, and any grant or denial of
the same should be viewed with great deference on appeal. See,
e.g., Santos-Santos, 842 F.3d at 169 (“Demonstrating excusable
neglect is a demanding standard.” (internal quotation marks
omitted)).
That being said, the law also manifests a strong
preference that cases be resolved on their merits. See Ortiz-

Page 6
– 6 –
Anglada v. Ortiz-Perez, 183 F.3d 65, 66 (1st Cir. 1999)
(“[D]isposition on the merits is favored . . . .”). We have
repeatedly made clear that “dismissal with prejudice for want of
prosecution is a unique and awesome [sanction]” to which courts
should not resort lightly. Pomales v. Celulares Telefónica, Inc.,
342 F.3d 44, 48 (1st Cir. 2003) (collecting cases). We have said
that dismissal is appropriate “in the face of extremely protracted
inaction (measured in years), disobedience of court orders,
ignorance of warnings, contumacious conduct, or some other
aggravating circumstance.” Id. (internal quotation marks
omitted). Such language implies that dismissal for failure to
prosecute is usually not appropriate for garden-variety, isolated
instances of attorney negligence. Given the Supreme Court’s
explicit directive that Rule 60(b) may be used as a litigant’s
opportunity to be heard on the appropriateness of a dismissal for
failure to prosecute, see Link, 370 U.S. at 632, a district court
facing a Rule 60(b) motion offering an explanation for failure to
prosecute should give a party’s explanation serious consideration
and ensure that, on a full factual record, dismissal remains the
appropriate sanction. See Hernandez v. Herndandez-Colon, No. 94-
2169, 1995 WL 146236, at *2 (1st Cir. Apr. 5, 1995) (unpublished
opinion) (reversing the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for relief
from a dismissal for failure to prosecute where additional

Page 7
– 7 –
information provided by the plaintiffs in their Rule 60(b) motion
rendered dismissal inappropriate).
Applying the above principles to the matter at hand, we
conclude that the district court abused its discretion in denying
Keane’s Rule 60(b) motion. There is no suggestion at all that
Keane’s counsel’s failure to appear was intentional. Nor does the
record point to any prior neglect by counsel or a lack of regard
for the importance of adhering to court-ordered deadlines.
Defendants cite the two instances when Keane’s counsel sought to
reschedule hearings. Those instances, though, reflect no lack of
regard for the court’s deadlines; to the contrary, counsel paid
attention to the hearing dates and followed the proper rules for
securing changes to those dates. It is possible that repeated
last-minute requests for extensions could, at a certain point,
become abusive, but wherever that point is, Keane’s two requests
did not reach it.
The district court also gave no notice that failure to
appear would result in dismissal with prejudice (rather than, for
example, a loss of the ability to present oral argument). And the
unexplained refusal to vacate the dismissal meant, as a practical
matter, that Keane’s claims were left without a single merits
adjudication. While particularly egregious instances of a party
neglecting to prosecute its case may lead to this result, the

Page 8
– 8 –
strong preference for adjudicating disputes on the merits counsels
against sua sponte dismissals where there has never been any
consideration of the merits.
Finally, defendants claim no serious prejudice beyond
the costs of having counsel travel to and from the hearing, a harm
that could have been remedied by a monetary sanction.
Alternatively, and perhaps preferably, the district court might
have proceeded with the hearing as scheduled. In that event,
defendants would have ended up suffering no harm at all, while the
harm to Keane (having to rely on his brief alone) would have fit
the fault without overshooting the mark.
It is true that we have said that an attorney’s failure
to meet court deadlines due to “routine carelessness” does not
generally constitute the excusable neglect that would merit relief
under Rule 60(b). See Negrón v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc., 316 F.3d
60, 62 (1st Cir. 2003); see also Santos-Santos, 842 F.3d at 169
(exceptional justification necessary for Rule 60(b) relief “must
be something more than an attorney’s failure to monitor the court’s
electronic docket”); Vargas v. Gonzalez, 975 F.2d 916, 918 (1st
Cir. 1992) (an attorney’s failure to attend a status conference
rescheduled at that attorney’s request was not excusable neglect
justifying a Rule 60(b) vacatur of the district court’s order
dismissing the case). But these cases dealt either with repeated

Page 9
– 9 –
offenses over the course of three months, see Vargas, 975 F.2d at
916, or failures to file objections to the reports of magistrate
judges within a time specified by court rules, see Negrón, 316
F.3d at 61; Santos-Santos, 842 F.3d at 166. Reports by magistrate
judges often include an express warning of what will happen if no
timely objection is filed. See Negrón, 316 F.3d at 61 (magistrate
judge’s order warned that failure to file specific objections
within ten days would waive appellate review); see also Santos-
Santos v. Puerto Rico Police Dep’t, 63 F. Supp. 3d 181, 184 (D.P.R.
2014) (“Absent objection, a district court has a right to assume
that the affected party agrees with the magistrate judge’s
recommendation.” (alterations and internal quotation marks
omitted)). In such cases, moreover, dismissal results only if the
magistrate judge first concludes that the dismissed claims fail on
the merits. In short, negligence in that context forfeits the
right to seek review of a merits adjudication. It does not, as
here, prevent any merits adjudication whatsoever.
It is also undoubtedly true that “[m]ost attorneys are
busy most of the time and they must organize their work so as to
be able to meet the time requirements of matters they are handling
or suffer the consequences.” Stonkus v. City of Brockton Sch.
Dept., 322 F.3d 97, 101 (1st Cir. 2003). But this assumes that
these consequences will be reasonably proportionate to the offense

Page 10
– 10 –
and thus foreseeable to counsel. As we have said, “the excusable
neglect inquiry involves a significant equitable component and
must give due regard to the totality of the relevant circumstances
surrounding the [party’s] lapse.” Dimmitt v. Ockenfels, 407 F.3d
21, 24 (1st Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). In
sum, Keane’s counsel’s behavior, though neglectful, was not
intentional, egregious, or repetitive, and a sanction short of
dismissal would have ensured that no harm was caused to Defendants
or to the court’s perfectly appropriate desire to move the
litigation forward. Faced with an innocent and undisputed reason
for counsel’s absence, the district court should have concluded
that while some sanction might have been appropriate, dismissal
with prejudice was too harsh given the circumstances.
III.
For the foregoing reasons, the district court’s denial
of Keane’s motion to vacate the prior order dismissing his case is
reversed, the order dismissing the case is vacated, and the case
is remanded to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion. Each party shall bear its own costs.

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD1 Comment

Experts question hiring of lobbyists by Wells Fargo’s board

Experts question hiring of lobbyists by Wells Fargo’s board

Charlotte Observer-

Wells Fargo’s board has spent more than half a million dollars on lobbyists in the past year as it’s pushed to move past a major sales scandal over fake accounts, new disclosures show.

The board has paid $600,000 to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck – among the largest lobbying firms in Washington – from Oct. 1, 2016, to Sept. 30, an Observer search of lobbying activity on Opensecrets.org found. Federal reports filed by Brownstein show the firm has received $150,000 every quarter since the scandal erupted in September 2016.

The lobbying comes at a time when the board is making some changes, including plans for Chairman Stephen Sanger and two other longtime directors to retire at the end of the year. Such moves haven’t been enough, though, for some members of Congress who want the removal of more directors.

[CHARLOTTE OBSERVER]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Posted in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD0 Comments

Advert

Archives