Press Release | US MAGISTRATE JUDGE REJECTS TRADE SECRET PRIVILEGE AND GRANTS MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY OF NATIONWIDE TITLE CLEARING ERIKA LANCE - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Press Release | US MAGISTRATE JUDGE REJECTS TRADE SECRET PRIVILEGE AND GRANTS MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY OF NATIONWIDE TITLE CLEARING ERIKA LANCE

Press Release | US MAGISTRATE JUDGE REJECTS TRADE SECRET PRIVILEGE AND GRANTS MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY OF NATIONWIDE TITLE CLEARING ERIKA LANCE

Tantillo

 

 

 

For Immediate Release                              Contact:  DeAnne Merey
646-785-9594
Dmerey@Tantillolaw.com

US MAGISTRATE JUDGE REJECTS TRADE SECRET PRIVILEGE AND GRANTS MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY

 Testimony Required Where Worries About Disclosure are Overblown

New York, N.Y.—July 6, 2017—United States Magistrate Judge, James C. Francis IV, granted plaintiffs’ motion to compel compliance with their subpoena to depose a third-party witness, Erika Lance. The witness had refused to answer questions on the basis that they required the disclosure of trade secrets in the case captioned S&A Capital Partners, Inc., Mortgage Resolution Servicing, LLC; and 1st Fidelity Loan Servicing, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Company, and Chase Home Finance LLC, No. 1:15-cv-00293-LTS-JCF.

Ms. Lance is an employee of Nationwide Title Clearing, Inc. (“NTC”) and was deposed on March 21, 2017 by plaintiffs’ attorney, Brent Tantillo, Managing Shareholder, Tantillo Law PLLC. During the deposition, Ms. Lance refused to answer questions that would purportedly elicit NTC’s proprietary information, including questions about NTC’s clients and the types of systems Ms. Lance used to create certain documents on which her name appears.

In granting the motion, Judge Frances determined that the plaintiffs’ need for the information outweighs harm of disclosure and that it had not been conclusively established that trade secrets or other confidential information would be elicited.  Judge Frances further reasoned that a protective order in this litigation would protect confidential information from disclosure to entities other than the attorneys who are litigating the case.

According to Brent Tantillo, “We are pleased with the court’s decision to grant our Motion to Compel. Trade secret discovery objections shouldn’t be used to obstruct justice in cases where adequate protections are available.”

 

About Tantillo Law PLLC:

Tantillo Law is an internationally recognized full-service litigation law firm headed by Brent Tantillo with offices in Washington D.C., Florida, and New York. An in-depth understanding of the statutory and regulatory framework in which issues arise enables Tantillo Law to offer exceptional representation in the areas of Banking, Government Regulatory Enforcement, Health Care Fraud and Abuse Defense, Internal Investigations, Securities & Investment Fraud, Whistleblower Representation, and White Collar Criminal Defense.  For more information, please visit TantilloLaw.com.

###

 

 

Press Release_Tantillo Law_7.7.17 (1) by DinSFLA on Scribd

Order Erika Lance NTC (1) by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11487 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “Press Release | US MAGISTRATE JUDGE REJECTS TRADE SECRET PRIVILEGE AND GRANTS MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY OF NATIONWIDE TITLE CLEARING ERIKA LANCE”

  1. “Kareem_Salessi_7-7-17”

    I probably know which trade secrets she was withholding, namely how they forge tons of documents with no effort, just like we have seen Fidelity/LPS/DocX forgery factories accomplish in the past two decades. These gangster forgers and their fraudster lawyers are relentless.

    Corrupt Santa Ana, California, federal courts blocked all of my efforts to obtain discovery from gangster defendants including “Fidelity Title Forgers”, “Wells Fargo Drug Cartel”, and a corrupt Judge William Monroe who had been bribed by “Wells Fargo Drug Cartel” corrupt attorney “Fredrick Hickman”, among others.

    My personal experience of USA courts is that they are nothing but “Controlled Oppositions Under Color of Law”, very similar to many non-MSM which pretend independence and truthfulness but are just controlled oppositions under the disguise of neutral media.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments