Bank of America, NA v. REYES-TOLEDO | HI Supreme Court – there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Bank of America held the Note at the time it filed the complaint … erred in dismissing Homeowner’s counterclaims - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Bank of America, NA v. REYES-TOLEDO | HI Supreme Court – there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Bank of America held the Note at the time it filed the complaint … erred in dismissing Homeowner’s counterclaims

Posted on28 February 2017.

Bank of America, NA v. REYES-TOLEDO | HI Supreme Court – there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Bank of America held the Note at the time it filed the complaint … erred in dismissing Homeowner’s counterclaims

h/t Dubin Law Offices

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI?I
—o0o—

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP,
Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

GRISEL REYES-TOLEDO,
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and

WAI KALOI AT MAKAKILO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION;
MAKAKILO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION; and
PALEHUA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

SCWC-15-0000005

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-15-0000005; CIVIL NO. 12-1-0668)

FEBRUARY 28, 2017

NAKAYAMA, ACTING C.J., McKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ., AND CIRCUIT
COURT JUDGE GARIBALDI, IN PLACE OF RECKTENWALD, C.J., RECUSED
OPINION OF THE COURT BY POLLACK, J.

This case raises issues of standing and appellate
jurisdiction that pertain to foreclosure proceedings. We
consider whether a foreclosing plaintiff seeking summary
judgment must prove it had standing to foreclose on the
homeowner’s property at the commencement of the lawsuit to be
entitled to foreclosure of the subject property. We also
determine the extent of appellate jurisdiction over
interlocutory orders leading up to a foreclosure decree.

[…]

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. SORRELL v U.S. BANK NA | FL 2DCA – neither the documentary evidence nor the live testimony established that U.S. Bank owned or held the indorsed note with the allonge when it filed the original foreclosure complaint NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND,...
  2. FELTUS v. US Bank N.A. | FL 2DCA “Affidavit of Indebtedness Fail, Genuine Issue of Material Fact of Who Owned or Held the Note” JULIA FELTUS, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as TRUSTEE...
  3. FELTUS v. US Bank N.A. | FL 2DCA “Affidavit of Indebtedness Fail, Genuine Issue of Material Fact of Who Owned or Held the Note” JULIA FELTUS, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as TRUSTEE...
  4. Floyd v. Bank of America, NA | FL 5DCA- genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether Bank of America had standing at the time the complaint was filed and because Nuñez lacked the personal knowledge required to admit Bank of America’s business records DANIELA FLOYD, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ETC., Appellee....
  5. Bank of NY Mellon Trust Co. v. Shaffer | Ohio Appeals Court – BONY failed to establish it held either the note or mortgage as of the date it filed the complaint, it lacked standing…Assignment recorded 2-Weeks after complaint IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY,...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11555 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,731 spam blocked by Akismet