Pro se PREVAILS on “fraud count” | Paul Farah v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Pro se PREVAILS on “fraud count” | Paul Farah v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Posted on29 November 2016.

Pro se PREVAILS on “fraud count” | Paul Farah v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Paul Farah v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

(9th Cir. 2016)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Filed: November 21st, 2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Docket Number: 14-15357

View original: From the court   |   Our backup
 . . .

In light of these additional allegations regarding nondisclosure of material information, we conclude that the district court erred in dismissing Farah’s fraud claim against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. ……(setting forth circumstances, including exclusive knowledge or partial suppression of material facts, in which nondisclosure constitutes actionable fraud);

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment as to Farah’s fraud claim against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and remand for further consideration consistent with this disposition.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.


3
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. Court of Appeals of Minnesota **Precedential** | BONY v. Keiran || TILA Bites BONY in the A$$ ||| … United States Supreme Court granted certiorari review of the Eighth Circuit’s opinion ….vacated judgment, and remanded to “the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jesinoski v. Countrywide H/T Court Listener STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS...
  2. WASHINGTON | Stephanie Tashiro-Townley v. Bank of New York Mellon (9th Cir. 2014) | AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED. | Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc. was unfairly or deceptively characterized as the beneficiary of a deed of trust NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE...
  3. JOHN SCHLEGEL V. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A | Ninth Circuit – Equal Credit Opportunity Act… Default Notices Violated the Loan Modification Agreement FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH...
  4. Acuff v Wells Fargo | Kentucky Court of Appeals Victory – Insufficient to establish whether Wells Fargo was the holder of the Acuffs’ original note RENDERED: MAY 9, 2014; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth...
  5. 575 ADAMS, LLC v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA | FL3DCA – 575 Adams seeks a writ of certiorari quashing the trial court’s order granting Wells Fargo Bank’s motion for a protective order, which prevents 575 Adams from deposing the only witness listed to testify on Wells Fargo’s behalf, Nathan Shue (“Shue”), Wells Fargo’s servicer’s corporate representative 575 Adams, LLC, Petitioner, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc.,...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11555 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,619 spam blocked by Akismet