Pro se PREVAILS on "fraud count" | Paul Farah v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Pro se PREVAILS on “fraud count” | Paul Farah v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Pro se PREVAILS on “fraud count” | Paul Farah v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Paul Farah v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

(9th Cir. 2016)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

View original: From the court   |   Our backup
 . . .

In light of these additional allegations regarding nondisclosure of material information, we conclude that the district court erred in dismissing Farah’s fraud claim against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. ……(setting forth circumstances, including exclusive knowledge or partial suppression of material facts, in which nondisclosure constitutes actionable fraud);

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment as to Farah’s fraud claim against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and remand for further consideration consistent with this disposition.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.


3
© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8480 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives