Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Cunningham | Moreover, since the plaintiff failed to establish its standing and that it complied with RPAPL 1304, the Supreme Court should have denied those branches of the plaintiff's motion...

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Cunningham | Moreover, since the plaintiff failed to establish its standing and that it complied with RPAPL 1304, the Supreme Court should have denied those branches of the plaintiff’s motion…

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Cunningham | Moreover, since the plaintiff failed to establish its standing and that it complied with RPAPL 1304, the Supreme Court should have denied those branches of the plaintiff’s motion…

 

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Cunningham (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

View original: From the court   |   Our backup
Moreover, since the plaintiff failed to establish its standing and that it complied with RPAPL 1304, the Supreme Court should have denied those branches of the plaintiff’s motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8541 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives