Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Royal Blue Realty Holdings, Inc | NYSC – The Court held that plaintiffs foreclosure action was time-barred because it filed the instant action after the six-year statute of limitations period expired - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Royal Blue Realty Holdings, Inc | NYSC – The Court held that plaintiffs foreclosure action was time-barred because it filed the instant action after the six-year statute of limitations period expired

Posted on16 August 2016.

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Royal Blue Realty Holdings, Inc | NYSC – The Court held that plaintiffs foreclosure action was time-barred because it filed the instant action after the six-year statute of limitations period expired

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
AS TRUSTEE FOR AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
ASSET TRUST 2006-6, MORTGAGE-BACKED
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES
2006-6

Plaintiff,

-against-

ROYAL BLUE REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC., JOHN SOUTO A/K/A JOHN
R. SOUTO, AS HEIR TO THE
ESTATE OF SERGE J. SOUTO
A/K/A SERGE SOUTO, MIDLAND
FUNDING LLC, SING YU INTERNATIONAL
INC SY MARBLE & GRANITE IMPORTORS,
CORNICELLO TENDLER & BAUMEL-CORNICELLO,
JESSE HERMAN, THOMAS HASKINS, G-NET
CONSTRUCTION CORP., JORDAN BUTTORFF,
LESLIE BUTTORFF, NEW YORK
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF 130
BARROW STREET CONDOMINIUM, NEW
YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
AND FINANCE, UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Royal Blue Realty by DinSFLA on Scribd

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. Deutsche Bank vs Beauvais | FL 3rdDCA – Because the Current Action was based upon the very same accelerated debt as the Initial Action, and because that Current Action was filed after the expiration of the five-year statute of limitations, it was barred H/T Dave Krieger Third District Court of Appeal State of...
  2. DEUTSCHE BANK v CHIARELLI | Statute of Limitations Foreclosure Dismissal Granted… In addition, the Court awarded defendant $2500.00 in reasonable attorney’s for having to defend the time-barred action SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF...
  3. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n as Trustee v. Adams | Maine Supreme Judicial Court – 6 year statute of limitations under section 752 applied and not the 20 year statute typically applicable to promissory notes Justia Opinion Summary In 2004, Charles Adams conveyed a portion...
  4. Condo association beats bank in million-dollar foreclosure battle, winning argument: The five-year statute of limitations Miami Herald- It is a condominium association’s version of winning...
  5. DEUTSCHE BANK V. BEAUVAIS, ET AL. | Motion on Rehearing – (dissenting) “I would affirm that part of the trial court’s final judgment holding that the statute of limitations precludes Deutsche Bank’s foreclosure action.” 🙁 66 pages below… Third District Court of Appeal State...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11543 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


One Response to “Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Royal Blue Realty Holdings, Inc | NYSC – The Court held that plaintiffs foreclosure action was time-barred because it filed the instant action after the six-year statute of limitations period expired”

  1. Mr. Behavior says:
    08/18/2016 at 3:47 am

    Looks like DBNTC wants a “take back,” or a “do over,” of the July 8, 2008, letter.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,030 spam blocked by Akismet