One Response to “TFH 3/20/16 | Foreclosure Workshop #7: How To Successfully Disqualify/Recuse Your Foreclosure Judge When Justified Based on Actual Appearances of Impropriety”

1. Kareem Salessi says:

   03/25/2016 at 5:45 pm

   California judge disqualification laws are a farce, and federal courts don’t even have any, that I know of.

   I know this from painful first hand personal experience where I properly exercised judicial challenges as to California and federal judges, and even took it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court as to the disqualification of “Judge William Monroe” of Orange County Superior Court, who I believe was under the payroll of banks, in this case “Wachovia Drug Cartel”, now known as “Wells Fargo Drug Cartel” (Google them).

   My understanding is that judges look at the disqualification statutes only as something to laugh at, especially when a challenge is brought by a self represented individual. Once challenged, that judge becomes more viciously, and criminally, malicious against the pro se who brings such a challenge and then totally destroys him/her in their case.

   Here is a summary of my first challenge against “Judge William Monroe”:

   On the morning of 7/8/08 I served “Judge Monroe” with a double judicial challenge, per CCP 170.6 (peremptory), and per CCP 170.1 (for cause).
   At this point the seemingly highly sophisticated California challenge statutes mandate that the judge has only one of the following choices [according to memory]:

   1- He can accept the challenge and refer the case to the presiding judge to reassign the case to another court;
   2- He can deny the challenge and send it to the presiding judge to decide. However, until the presiding judge decides whether to accept that denial, the judge can not hold any hearings, or have any contacts with the parties;
   3- He can deny with an answer which must be sent to the presiding judge to decide, but until the presiding judge decides upon the challenge and the judge’s answer, he can not hold any hearings or issue any orders;
   4- He can ignore the challenge and do nothing about it, whereupon he will be deemed automatically disqualified, as of the date of the challenge, due to his waiver of denial. In this case if he issues any orders, or holds any hearings after served with the challenge, all such orders are deemed null & void;

   Judge Monroe did none of the above!
   Instead, Judge Monroe held a previously calendared motion, which he should have cancelled, in the afternoon of the day he was served the challenge (7/8/08).
   Not knowing that I, and a witness of mine, were in the court room Judge Monroe conspired with two lawyers as to how to defeat the challenge, and even conspired with them to answer, and to strike, the challenge on the date that the drug cartel lawyer told him to (7/15/08), so that he could immediately hold a staged auction to steal my house.
   He calls his un-judicial acts “Monroe’s Law”! [this is in court transcripts]

   If adjudicated properly, Judge Monroe should have been dishonorably discharged from his judicial functions for abuse of honest services, to say the least. The two fraudster counsel should have been disbarred for multiple causes, including the corruption of a judicial officer.
   However, my follow ups, to law-enforcement, and even all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court Case #11-1013 were futile. I believe they all laughed their heads off.

   Case #11-1013 briefs gives interested readers a clear picture of, how, and why California Judicial Challenge laws have been made a farce by the very people who are supposed to enforce them, and respect them.
   I call California Judicial Challenge laws straw laws, just like so many other things which are fake.

   That and many other documents leading to 11-1013 are posted in “Salessi Litigation Page”.

   Thank you for posting this comment.

   “Kareem Salessi 3-25-16”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Reply