Hooker v Bank of America Wells Fargo and QLS | WA Supreme Court - Quality’s violations of the Deeds of Trust Act are grounds to sustain Plaintiff’s claim for damages...entitled to a judgment for treble the amount of her injury, along with her costs of suit, including her reasonable attorneys’ fees

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Hooker v Bank of America Wells Fargo and QLS | WA Supreme Court – Quality’s violations of the Deeds of Trust Act are grounds to sustain Plaintiff’s claim for damages…entitled to a judgment for treble the amount of her injury, along with her costs of suit, including her reasonable attorneys’ fees

Hooker v Bank of America Wells Fargo and QLS | WA Supreme Court – Quality’s violations of the Deeds of Trust Act are grounds to sustain Plaintiff’s claim for damages…entitled to a judgment for treble the amount of her injury, along with her costs of suit, including her reasonable attorneys’ fees

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON
FOR KING COUNTY

CONNIE L. HOOKER,
Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A., QUALITY LOAN SERVICE
CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, INC. and
Doe Defendants 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Counterclaimant,

v.

CONNIE L. HOOKER, CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,
and UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE,
Counterclaim
Defendants

Conclusion

For the reasons stated above, the court concludes that Defendant Quality committed two
violations of the Washington Deeds of Trust Act when it commenced the nonjudicial foreclosure
of the Plaintiff’s Deed of Trust: (1) Quality violated RCW 61.24.010(1)(a), which requires a
corporate Trustee to have at least one corporate officer who is a Washington resident; and/or
(2) Quality violated RCW 61.24.010(2), which requires a Trustee of a deed of trust to have been
appointed by the beneficiary of the deed of trust.

Quality’s violations of the Deeds of Trust Act are grounds to sustain Plaintiff’s claim for
damages against Quality pursuant the Consumer Protection Act, Chapter 19.86 RCW. The
Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment in her favor and against Quality for treble the amount of her
injury, along with her costs of suit, including her reasonable attorneys’ fees.

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8540 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives